IA-NYT/Siena: Biden +3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:37:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  IA-NYT/Siena: Biden +3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA-NYT/Siena: Biden +3  (Read 1982 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: October 21, 2020, 12:43:10 PM »

Favorabiliites:

Biden 50/47 (+3)
Trump 46/51 (-5)

Greenfield 51/38 (+13)
Ernst 46/47 (-1)

The favorabilities give a bit more into the window of the possible final topline (51-47, 50-46), while there's no way Greenfield is trailing Ernst with those fav differences.

I agree. I’m pissed NYT didn’t push undecideds. This is the first lead for Ernst I’ve seen in months, but it’s misleading when you look at those favorables.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2020, 01:20:41 PM »

Even with all the undecideds though... Did Hillary ever have a lead in Iowa this close to the election? I don’t think so. Certainly didn’t have those favorability numbers. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Those favorability numbers are THE critical numbers of the election. They are the single biggest difference between this year and 2016. A popular vs. unpopular candidate is a whole different ballgame from two unpopular candidates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.