NYT/Siena - AK: Trump +6 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 06:17:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  NYT/Siena - AK: Trump +6 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NYT/Siena - AK: Trump +6  (Read 3202 times)
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


« on: October 16, 2020, 03:25:44 PM »

Anchorage is +9 for Biden proving the urban/suburban vs rural divide is even going to Alaska.

For reference:  

2008:  McCain won Anchorage by 16 pts.  (57-41)
2012:  Romney won Anchorage by 10 pts. (53-43)
2016:  Trump won Anchorage by 5 pts. (47-42*)

I have Anchorage more at (40-49 R) in 2016 with about 102k total ballots once you factor in absentee ballots not assigned to precincts and take the State Districts which overlap the City and add them to the total.

So Anchorage represented roughly 1/3rd of the total statewide vote in 2016 with Trump netting +10k margins off of the City, out of his 60k state vote lead.

If we take these poll numbers with a 47-39 Biden from Anchorage, it looks like Biden would end up with a net ~10k out of Anchorage, effectively shrinking the 60k Trump margins to a 40k lead, if everything else stayed the same.

Also it is noteworthy that this poll has Biden effectively tied here among Seniors, and 3rd Party voters are disproportionately younger voters. I suspect that at the end of the day, many will end up voting Biden rather than 3rd Party.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,454
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2020, 12:05:14 AM »

The more I look at the cross tabs of this poll, the better it looks for Biden. LeanvR.

What part looks good for him? The very high # of undecideds+third-party support among younger voters is not good for Biden. He's doing well with women, but I don't think it'll be enough to make the state competitive on election day.

Anchorage’s trend as well as the fact that they seemed to have issues reaching out to indigenous D-leaning voters in western AK.

It's not just Western Alaska....Native-American communities in Alaska, actually run something maybe around 18% of the total statewide population, and typically tend to be more concentrated in rural parts of the State outside of Metro Anchorage.

Here's a Census demographic map of Alaska by the "Other category"

into

I am not an expert on Native voting patterns in Alaska, let alone comparative turnout levels by election, but it is certainly plausible that if you look at the Census Map breakdown by "Other" when it comes to race & ethnicity, you will see solid Native majorities just about everywhere in the North and West (Even the North Slope is ~53% Native), until you roll into Fairbanks to the North and down to Mat-Su and the Kodiak Inlet. Meanwhile you have another large Native American belt which stretches down from the Copper River into the Alaskan panhandle where you see a significant presence of Native Populations who were trading partners and had similar cultures and languages to many of the Native populations of BC, Washington, and NW Oregon....

So agree with your broader argument as to what it might take for an AK-PRES flip...

Wish we knew more about what's going on in Mat-Su.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.