CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:57:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CBS/YouGov: Greenfield +4 in IA, Peters +3 in MI  (Read 2438 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: October 11, 2020, 12:09:10 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2020, 02:49:28 PM »

Some of these MI-SEN numbers are a bit disturbing. However, I also think Biden’s MI number is likely a little low here. And undecideds seem to be favorable for Dems. I doubt Peters ends up losing, but did not expect to see Greenfield running ahead of him in any poll.

James is simply a really good candidate.

Is it that James is a really good candidate or Peters is just a meh candidate who most Michigan voters still don't seem to really know exists? I mean, both candidates are still stuck in the 40s, plenty of undecideds. I'd be shocked if Peters significantly underperformed Biden due to a lot of Biden/James voters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.