Opinion of Amy Coney Barrett

[President Johnson]

Clearly HP.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

This.
Btw not surprisingly my dad is cheering.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

This.
Btw not surprisingly my dad is cheering.

Why does your dad care about the US's federal judiciary exactly?

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

This.
Btw not surprisingly my dad is cheering.

Why does your dad care about the US's federal judiciary exactly?

Because he follows American politics regularly and he is still smart enough to understand that the federal judiciary matters a lot in the US.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

This.
Btw not surprisingly my dad is cheering.

Why does your dad care about the US's federal judiciary exactly?

Because he follows American politics regularly and he is still smart enough to understand that the federal judiciary matters a lot in the US.

Fair enough. I don't know much about how the Court of Cassation works, but if I did, I'd probably care about it too (and about the Japanese Supreme Court if it ever actually ruled on the constitutionality of anything).

[Alcibiades]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

I think Feinstein’s line of questioning was perfectly legitimate. I will stand corrected if the truth is otherwise, but as far as I can remember she did not lean into the “taking orders from Rome” trope, and her questioning could have applied equally to a Protestant or Muslim as a Catholic. ACB has expressed a worrying opposition to church-state separation, and keeping her religious views out of her rulings, and she should expect to be questioned on it.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

I think Feinstein’s line of questioning was perfectly legitimate. I will stand corrected if the truth is otherwise, but as far as I can remember she did not lean into the “taking orders from Rome” trope, and her questioning could have applied equally to a Protestant or Muslim as a Catholic. ACB has expressed a worrying opposition to church-state separation, and keeping her religious views out of her rulings, and she should expect to be questioned on it.

I might have felt differently about Feinstein's questions if the substantive issue behind them had been something else. What she was asking Barrett about was an article arguing that Catholic judges should recuse themselves in capital cases due to the Church's opposition to capital punishment, meaning that Feinstein was attacking a conservative jurist for being critical of the death penalty but framing the question in a way that made her look like the woke one. Classic DiFi bullsh**t.

[Alcibiades]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

I think Feinstein’s line of questioning was perfectly legitimate. I will stand corrected if the truth is otherwise, but as far as I can remember she did not lean into the “taking orders from Rome” trope, and her questioning could have applied equally to a Protestant or Muslim as a Catholic. ACB has expressed a worrying opposition to church-state separation, and keeping her religious views out of her rulings, and she should expect to be questioned on it.

I might have felt differently about Feinstein's questions if the substantive issue behind them had been something else. What she was asking Barrett about was an article arguing that Catholic judges should recuse themselves in capital cases due to the Church's opposition to capital punishment, meaning that Feinstein was attacking a conservative jurist for being critical of the death penalty but framing the question in a way that made her look like the woke one. Classic DiFi bullsh**t.

OK, that bit sounds a little bizarre, but I think that it is legitimate to ask a nominee if their religious views could impair their ability to hold follow the secular law of the land in their rulings and hold all equal before it, and if they would try to impose their religious morality on others.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

This.
Btw not surprisingly my dad is cheering.

Why does your dad care about the US's federal judiciary exactly?

Because he follows American politics regularly and he is still smart enough to understand that the federal judiciary matters a lot in the US.

Fair enough. I don't know much about how the Court of Cassation works, but if I did, I'd probably care about it too (and about the Japanese Supreme Court if it ever actually ruled on the constitutionality of anything).

The Court of Cassation does not rule on constitutional matters in Italy. That goes to the Constitutional Court (which in any case is not as important as SCOTUS).
Also, Italian legal writing is awful. I once tried to read a sentence of the Constitutional Court. I don't think I was even able to finish it. And for reference, I have read at least Flowers v. Mississippi and Ramos v. Louisiana in full, and of course, my native tongue is Italian.

[Alben Barkley]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

I think Feinstein’s line of questioning was perfectly legitimate. I will stand corrected if the truth is otherwise, but as far as I can remember she did not lean into the “taking orders from Rome” trope, and her questioning could have applied equally to a Protestant or Muslim as a Catholic. ACB has expressed a worrying opposition to church-state separation, and keeping her religious views out of her rulings, and she should expect to be questioned on it.

I might have felt differently about Feinstein's questions if the substantive issue behind them had been something else. What she was asking Barrett about was an article arguing that Catholic judges should recuse themselves in capital cases due to the Church's opposition to capital punishment, meaning that Feinstein was attacking a conservative jurist for being critical of the death penalty but framing the question in a way that made her look like the woke one. Classic DiFi bullsh**t.

It had nothing to do with the death penalty. That just happened to be what she was writing about. The idea was “If you are going to apply this line of reasoning to the death penalty, what else will you let your religion influence as a judge? Abortion? Contraception?” Etc.

[Big Abraham]

Absolutely awful, but I do have some personal sympathy for her because of Feinstein's disgusting religion-baiting attacks on her during her Seventh Circuit confirmation.

https://twitter.com/SeanMcCarthyCom/status/1309892551365844992

[TDAS04]

Very low.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

She is gonna be the next justice of SCOTUS and she is against amnesty and she is for adoptions, she adopted 2 Haitian kids. In an era of contraceptives and adoptions, abortions arent necessary

[Kyle Rittenhouse is a Political Prisoner]

She's wonderful. A great constitutional conservative.

[TML]

In my book, any judge who favors corporations & their bosses over regular workers automatically earns an HP designation.

[brucejoel99]

HP because she didn't have to accept the nomination. As far as I'm concerned, she's complicit in McConnell's court-stacking hypocrisy.

[Ferguson97]

HP for her far-right beliefs

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

She isn't a Dem and I am not an R, but, the point I was making is that she represents Americans changing viewpoint on abortion when she adopted 2 Haitian kids, that abortions arent necessary, and birth rates are going down from 3.5 to 1.5 and birth control, contraceptives and adoptions are more likelier than not in 21st century than abortions

[vitoNova]

She's kinda hot.

Ain't gonna lie. 

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

HP because she didn't have to accept the nomination. As far as I'm concerned, she's complicit in McConnell's court-stacking hypocrisy.

it's literally a once in a lifetime opportunity, so I won't fault her for going along with this. Besides, Gorsuch is the one occupying Garland's stolen seat. If McConnell hadn't undertaken his power play four years ago, Barrett would still have been nominated for this open seat.

[Dr Oz Lost Party!]

Unworthy of being RBG's successor.

[Lambsbread]

She will be to the right what RGB was to the left. But she will contribute to unspeakable damage for real people, so therefore...huge HP.

[lfromnj]

She's kinda hot.

Ain't gonna lie. 

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/go-to-horny-jail

[RI]

I've been a big fan of hers for quite some time. Exactly who I want on the Supreme Court right now.