MN-07: Why the agriculture industry is all in on sending Collin Peterson back to Congress
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:19:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MN-07: Why the agriculture industry is all in on sending Collin Peterson back to Congress
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: MN-07: Why the agriculture industry is all in on sending Collin Peterson back to Congress  (Read 1533 times)
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,753
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 18, 2020, 05:34:35 PM »
« edited: November 19, 2020, 11:28:00 AM by #SaveTheSenate »

That was such a beautiful Kirking. Beautiful stunning Michelle Fischbach finally got the job done.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 18, 2020, 05:36:09 PM »

This was such a beautiful Kirking. Beautiful stunning Michelle Fischbach finally got the job done.

It's astonishing the extent to which Peterson collapsed this year, after experiencing steadily decreasing margins of victory in 2014, 2016, and 2018. It's as if the bottom fell out from under him. Voting against impeachment did nothing to save him.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 18, 2020, 05:46:53 PM »

Gosh, I feel like an alien when it comes to the subject of Collin Peterson. His race is a tossup, pure and simple, same as it was in 2018, 2016 (arguably a much more dangerous year for him), and 2014.

He's probably more likely to lose now than he ever has been, but there's no reason to think he is overall likely to lose, let alone sure to lose.

There was PLENTY of reasons to believe he was likely to lose, which he did by 13 points, larger than any Republican incumbent's loss in 2018. The fact the he did worse in 2018 than 2016, when almost no other Democratic incumbent did, should've been the first warning sign. Then, you add in the presidential year straight-ticket voting and polarization (Peterson won in 2016 because the congressional Republican coalition wasn't nearly as reconciled with the Trump coalition as 2020) and a reputable opponent, it was clear he was an underdog.
Logged
Bootes Void
iamaganster123
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,677
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 18, 2020, 08:04:04 PM »

The people of western Minnesota just removed the head of the agricultural committee, dumb move.
Logged
Meatball Ron
recoveringdemocrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,284


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2020, 10:51:10 AM »

This was such a beautiful Kirking. Beautiful stunning Michelle Fischbach finally got the job done.

For two years. Minnesota is losing a seat in redistricting and this district specifically is shrinking - she's a goner in '22.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 19, 2020, 11:10:08 AM »

This was such a beautiful Kirking. Beautiful stunning Michelle Fischbach finally got the job done.

For two years. Minnesota is losing a seat in redistricting and this district specifically is shrinking - she's a goner in '22.

Its not certain, Minnesota did have the highest census response rate.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.