Did Stevenson have the most heterogeneous group of voters?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:28:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Did Stevenson have the most heterogeneous group of voters?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Stevenson have the most heterogeneous group of voters?  (Read 485 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,662


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 13, 2020, 04:12:29 PM »

Adlai Stevenson lost in 1952 and 1956 by large margins. Even though, he had a very heterogeneous group of voters. Southern segrationists and northern leftists voted for him. Both groups voted for FDR too, but since FDR won by large margin, he had also the votes of northern moderates. Since Stevenson didn't do well in the north, only very left-wing people voted for him. Is this conclusion correct?
Logged
ChrisMcDanielWasRobbed
KYtrader
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 463


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2020, 04:21:01 PM »

Sort of. He had a diverse coalition, but as he got more support from one group he would lose support from many others. This gave a rather ironic electoral college result where all the big northern cities were cancelled out by rural areas leaving Stevenson's only EVs from the south. This basically meant that he had the support of the most loyal democrats at the time and not many others.

One interesting note is that many segregationist supported Ike in 1952 but not in 1956, as shown by South Carolina and Mississippi having Ike on the ballot as an independent in 1952 but there was an unpledged electors movement of Harry Byrd and T Coleman Andrews in 1956. Also, as I noted in my previous topic, Ike did well among southern blacks in 1956, but not 1952.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2020, 09:13:08 AM »

Sort of. He had a diverse coalition, but as he got more support from one group he would lose support from many others. This gave a rather ironic electoral college result where all the big northern cities were cancelled out by rural areas leaving Stevenson's only EVs from the south. This basically meant that he had the support of the most loyal democrats at the time and not many others.

One interesting note is that many segregationist supported Ike in 1952 but not in 1956, as shown by South Carolina and Mississippi having Ike on the ballot as an independent in 1952 but there was an unpledged electors movement of Harry Byrd and T Coleman Andrews in 1956. Also, as I noted in my previous topic, Ike did well among southern blacks in 1956, but not 1952.

And several of the Northern cities, such as San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, and Minneapolis, voted for Eisenhower in 1956, who also came close in New York City.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.