2024: AOC vs. Charlie Baker
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 11:12:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Alternative Elections (Moderator: Dereich)
  2024: AOC vs. Charlie Baker
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2024: AOC vs. Charlie Baker  (Read 1860 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,984
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 22, 2020, 11:27:13 PM »

What would a map of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vs. Charlie Baker look like?
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,135
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2020, 12:54:57 AM »



Fmr. Governor Charlie Baker - 361 EVs / 56.7% PV
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - 177 EVs / 40.9 % PV
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,173
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2020, 06:06:42 AM »


New Jersey and Oregon might flip too.

Fmr. Governor Charlie Baker - 361 EVs / 56.7% PV
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - 177 EVs / 40.9 % PV
Logged
Nightcore Nationalist
Okthisisnotepic.
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,827


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2020, 12:27:59 PM »

Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2020, 01:32:54 PM »

I still have a very hard time seeing MA flip, even with Baker and even against AOC. It certainly would be the best possible conditions for such a thing, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
Logged
Breton Racer
Harrytruman48
Rookie
**
Posts: 216
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2020, 11:40:29 AM »

As much as I like her she would lose, not as badly as many would think. She would still be more likely to win the popular vote than not.



Baker: 320 EVs (48%)
Cortez: 218 EVs (49%)
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,290
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2020, 05:05:58 PM »

I think people are overestimating how much an effect individual candidates would have. Both candidates would have to have broad appeal to their respective parties to win the nomination. States like Colorado, Virginia, and Massachusetts aren't abandoning their partisan voting habits.



Baker 328 50% - AOC 210 48%
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2020, 05:17:50 PM »



Assuming that there was no 3rd party conservative candidate it would be an utter shellacking.

There would be ticket-splitting on the order of 1972, when Democrats lost a handful of seats in the House and gained seats in the Senate despite McGovern's awful drubbing.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2020, 05:19:12 PM »



Assuming that there was no 3rd party conservative candidate it would be an utter shellacking.

There would be ticket-splitting on the order of 1972, when Democrats lost a handful of seats in the House and gained seats in the Senate despite McGovern's awful drubbing.

Why would AOC win New Mexico but not New York? Also would Charlie actually carry Massachusetts or Maryland in a federal race?
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2020, 05:34:41 PM »



AOC/Elizabeth Warren 43%
Charlie Baker/Joni Ernst 42%
Mike Pence/Sarah Palin 16%

This one goes to the House (if I'm not mistaken about how redistricting goes).

Baker or Pence probably wins in the House, while depending on who controls the Senate, Ernst or Warren could emerge as VP. My guess is that Republicans will control the Senate, meaning Ernst will be named VP.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,721
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2020, 05:37:15 PM »



Assuming that there was no 3rd party conservative candidate it would be an utter shellacking.

There would be ticket-splitting on the order of 1972, when Democrats lost a handful of seats in the House and gained seats in the Senate despite McGovern's awful drubbing.

Why would AOC win New Mexico but not New York? Also would Charlie actually carry Massachusetts or Maryland in a federal race?

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/when-you-cant-stand-your-candidate

AOC obtaining the Democratic nomination for President in 2024 would put the Democrats in a "When You Can't Stand Your Candidate" situation.  As Elliott Abrams (a former Democrat and Scoop Jackson supporter in 1972) laid out the situation:

Quote
The party has nominated someone who cannot win and should not be president of the United States. We anticipate a landslide defeat, and then a struggle to take the party back from his team and his supporters and win the following presidential election. Meanwhile, we need to figure out how to conduct ourselves.

AOC would be that kind of candidate.  The Democratic Establishment would shudder at the thought of her nomination, and even the far left would view her as a candidate that would be unlikely to win, given her age, notoriety, and the fact that her views, even now, are on the Far Left of the Democratic Party.  Baker, on the other hand, would be a non-threatening Republican who would obtain a great deal of Democratic support.  There would be defections.  There would be Democrats for Baker.  Indeed, Charlie Baker could argue to many mainstream Democrats that he's closer to them on issues than AOC.  And Baker could work this in a way to where he makes it plain that it's OK to vote for Democrats to Congress.  (Nixon did this most skillfully.)  

It is more likely that AOC would be nominated by the Democrats than it would be that Baker would be nominated by the GOP, strange to say.  If it DID happen, however, I believe that the Democrats would gag on AOC and would seek to distance themselves wherever possible.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2020, 04:53:04 PM »

Baker flips NJ and CT

Middlesex, NJ goes R
Logged
Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas
Ray Goldfield
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,781


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2020, 08:54:04 PM »

I think people are overestimating how much an effect individual candidates would have. Both candidates would have to have broad appeal to their respective parties to win the nomination. States like Colorado, Virginia, and Massachusetts aren't abandoning their partisan voting habits.



Baker 328 50% - AOC 210 48%

I agree about MA, but I think Virginia and Colorado mainly aren't swing states anymore because of the directions of the party. They attract a lot of young urban professionals who lean left but want to keep their way of life. We're not going to see them vote for someone to the left of Sanders based on partisan lean alone.
Logged
AGA
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,290
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -5.39

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2020, 08:59:59 PM »

I think people are overestimating how much an effect individual candidates would have. Both candidates would have to have broad appeal to their respective parties to win the nomination. States like Colorado, Virginia, and Massachusetts aren't abandoning their partisan voting habits.



Baker 328 50% - AOC 210 48%

I agree about MA, but I think Virginia and Colorado mainly aren't swing states anymore because of the directions of the party. They attract a lot of young urban professionals who lean left but want to keep their way of life. We're not going to see them vote for someone to the left of Sanders based on partisan lean alone.

If both candidates ran on their own ideologies, then I'd agree, but I think each would be encouraged by their party a bit to run on a more generic D or R platform.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2020, 10:30:51 AM »

Stop trying to make R-MN happen. It's not going to happen.



Identity politics saves AOC in New Mexico and just barely falls short of saving her in Nevada. Massachusetts is much closer than normal, but still solidly D. Delaware is also unusually close.

NE-02 is D because after 2020 it is redrawn into a D sink.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,630
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2020, 02:18:34 AM »

https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=42lc

The default result is a strong non-landslide for Baker. Climate change would be the prime factor to provoke an AOC win.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.