Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:30:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 86
Author Topic: Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread  (Read 144826 times)
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #500 on: October 14, 2020, 01:38:26 PM »

This is absolutely motherf--king insane.  Biden and Harrison campaigns need to be absolutely on top of this and the Democratic Party needs to drown South Carolina in lawsuits.

ABSENTEE BALLOTS ARE BEING SENT WITH INSTRUCTIONS THAT, IF FOLLOWED, WOULD LEAD TO THE BALLOTS BEING THROWN OUT.

And OF COURSE South Carolina won't even tell you if your ballot is thrown out.  For this, or any other reason.  Just gotta cross your fingers.  WTF

Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,172


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #501 on: October 14, 2020, 01:42:39 PM »

Where was this sent? I received mine in Charleston and it made it clear we needed a witness.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #502 on: October 14, 2020, 09:01:18 PM »

Texas limits by-mail early voting to:
   (1) Those over 65.
   (2) Those with disabilities.
   (3) Those who are incarcerated (non-felons awaiting trial in jail)
   (4) Those who will be outside the county for the entire early-voting period.

I'm actually way more mad about the 5th Circuit's (and I think at least one other circuit's) ruling on that. Drop boxes are at least debatable but that's a blatant violation of the plain text of the Constitution. The 26th Amendment was worded identically to the 15th Amendment, so it demands the same level of scrutiny that would be given to an explicit whites-only absentee voting law. (Though maybe I shouldn't expect that the court would stop that either.)
Texas has never had "drop boxes". A mail voter could take their ballot to the county clerk on election day, and after showing an ID, could hand deliver it. Most voters, like, mailed their mail ballot.

You'd think that if someone thought that the 26th Amendment was applicable, they would have filed suit in the past 48 years. I'm pretty sure someone would have filed suit against a mail ballot for whites-only before 1913, or a male-only mail (male?) ballot before 1968.

Texas could simply eliminate the dispensation for those over 65. Many elderly have mobility or other disabilities.






Your tirade completely ignores the fundamental equal protection issue of limiting one ballot drop box, however you wish to label it per County weather. County is 169 resident Loving County or. Nearly 5 million populated Harris County.

Surely even a conspiracy theorist who had it on with the most point and laugh absurd Notions during the entire North Carolina 9th District voting fraud - - can understand that this is pure and simple voter suppression designed to minimize Democrats chances to vote in crowded urban areas versus Republicans in smaller counties? Do you even attempt to deny this?
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #503 on: October 14, 2020, 09:03:52 PM »

Texas limits by-mail early voting to:
   (1) Those over 65.
   (2) Those with disabilities.
   (3) Those who are incarcerated (non-felons awaiting trial in jail)
   (4) Those who will be outside the county for the entire early-voting period.

I'm actually way more mad about the 5th Circuit's (and I think at least one other circuit's) ruling on that. Drop boxes are at least debatable but that's a blatant violation of the plain text of the Constitution. The 26th Amendment was worded identically to the 15th Amendment, so it demands the same level of scrutiny that would be given to an explicit whites-only absentee voting law. (Though maybe I shouldn't expect that the court would stop that either.)
Texas has never had "drop boxes". A mail voter could take their ballot to the county clerk on election day, and after showing an ID, could hand deliver it. Most voters, like, mailed their mail ballot.

You'd think that if someone thought that the 26th Amendment was applicable, they would have filed suit in the past 48 years. I'm pretty sure someone would have filed suit against a mail ballot for whites-only before 1913, or a male-only mail (male?) ballot before 1968.

Texas could simply eliminate the dispensation for those over 65. Many elderly have mobility or other disabilities.


Perhaps this being the first election in a mass pandemic is a factor, Jim.
And ... Orange Man Bad? Perhaps?


Or maybe the first thing, and you're just being a foolish partisan hack.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #504 on: October 14, 2020, 11:36:50 PM »

Texas limits by-mail early voting to:
   (1) Those over 65.
   (2) Those with disabilities.
   (3) Those who are incarcerated (non-felons awaiting trial in jail)
   (4) Those who will be outside the county for the entire early-voting period.

I'm actually way more mad about the 5th Circuit's (and I think at least one other circuit's) ruling on that. Drop boxes are at least debatable but that's a blatant violation of the plain text of the Constitution. The 26th Amendment was worded identically to the 15th Amendment, so it demands the same level of scrutiny that would be given to an explicit whites-only absentee voting law. (Though maybe I shouldn't expect that the court would stop that either.)
Texas has never had "drop boxes". A mail voter could take their ballot to the county clerk on election day, and after showing an ID, could hand deliver it. Most voters, like, mailed their mail ballot.

You'd think that if someone thought that the 26th Amendment was applicable, they would have filed suit in the past 48 years. I'm pretty sure someone would have filed suit against a mail ballot for whites-only before 1913, or a male-only mail (male?) ballot before 1968.

Texas could simply eliminate the dispensation for those over 65. Many elderly have mobility or other disabilities.






Your tirade completely ignores the fundamental equal protection issue of limiting one ballot drop box, however you wish to label it per County weather. County is 169 resident Loving County or. Nearly 5 million populated Harris County.

Surely even a conspiracy theorist who had it on with the most point and laugh absurd Notions during the entire North Carolina 9th District voting fraud - - can understand that this is pure and simple voter suppression designed to minimize Democrats chances to vote in crowded urban areas versus Republicans in smaller counties? Do you even attempt to deny this?
Mail ballots are intended to be mailed. There are dozens of post offices in Harris County. Or a voter can go to in-person voting, surrender their mail ballot and vote in person.

There is no reason to have more than one location for in-person return of ballots -essentially the same place that you mail your ballots to.

PS You didn't happen to catch the SNAFU about the Pledge of Allegiance at the Bladen County Board of Elections. After the Democrats took control of the board, they decided to drop the Pledge from their agenda. After they voted down adding it back to the agenda, a citizen got up and started reciting the pledge. The Democrats sat their fuming. Another person stormed out of the room giving what appears to be the National Socialist salute to the USA flag.

PPS McCrae Dowless is running for re-election.
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #505 on: October 15, 2020, 04:47:42 PM »

Looks like Abbotts order limiting drop boxes has been lifted again:

Quote
A Texas judge on Thursday lifted an order by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott that limited counties to a single drop-off location for absentee ballots in the Nov. 3 presidential election, siding with Democrats who have denounced the limit as voter suppression.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/judge-lifts-texas-governor-s-order-limiting-ballot-drop-boxes-n1243580?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma
Logged
Interlocutor is just not there yet
Interlocutor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,204


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #506 on: October 15, 2020, 05:17:25 PM »

Looks like Abbotts order limiting drop boxes has been lifted again:

Quote
A Texas judge on Thursday lifted an order by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott that limited counties to a single drop-off location for absentee ballots in the Nov. 3 presidential election, siding with Democrats who have denounced the limit as voter suppression.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/judge-lifts-texas-governor-s-order-limiting-ballot-drop-boxes-n1243580?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma


Wouldn't the earlier US Court of Appeals decision supersede any Texas judge decision?
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #507 on: October 15, 2020, 06:06:45 PM »

Looks like Abbotts order limiting drop boxes has been lifted again:

Quote
A Texas judge on Thursday lifted an order by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott that limited counties to a single drop-off location for absentee ballots in the Nov. 3 presidential election, siding with Democrats who have denounced the limit as voter suppression.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/judge-lifts-texas-governor-s-order-limiting-ballot-drop-boxes-n1243580?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma


Wouldn't the earlier US Court of Appeals decision supersede any Texas judge decision?

"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton quickly appealed Sulak’s order to the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. The court is expected to quickly rule on whether to stay Sulak’s order and reinstate Abbott’s limit."

From what I gathered, it's a pause on Abbotts order until the court decides again.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #508 on: October 15, 2020, 10:22:29 PM »

Looks like Abbotts order limiting drop boxes has been lifted again:

Quote
A Texas judge on Thursday lifted an order by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott that limited counties to a single drop-off location for absentee ballots in the Nov. 3 presidential election, siding with Democrats who have denounced the limit as voter suppression.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/judge-lifts-texas-governor-s-order-limiting-ballot-drop-boxes-n1243580?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma


Wouldn't the earlier US Court of Appeals decision supersede any Texas judge decision?
This lawsuit was based on provisions in the Texas Constitution. The cases has been appealed, which automatically stays it.

A few years ago there was a decision by a Travis County district judge against qualification of the Green Party. The judge asked the litigating parties whether he should recuse himself because he voted for Democrats, knowing that replacing him would cause the Green Party to miss a deadline.

He said that he was going to rule against the Green Party, and said that he would be overturned by the Texas Supreme Court. He was. Meanwhile (within a day of his ruling in favor of the Democratic Party) the district judge made a contribution of $10,000 to the Democratic Party of Travis County.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,115


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #509 on: October 16, 2020, 11:26:47 AM »

Michigan bans open carrying of guns at polling sites on Election Day
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,333
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #510 on: October 16, 2020, 11:32:08 AM »


Good. This shouldn't even be a question lol
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #511 on: October 16, 2020, 01:03:54 PM »

Logged
Non Swing Voter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,169


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #512 on: October 16, 2020, 02:49:25 PM »

Have to say, Texas' voter suppression effort isn't going well...
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #513 on: October 16, 2020, 05:21:29 PM »

Logged
Obama-Biden Democrat
Zyzz
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,825


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #514 on: October 16, 2020, 05:47:26 PM »


murrica'
Logged
Interlocutor is just not there yet
Interlocutor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,204


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #515 on: October 16, 2020, 05:49:07 PM »
« Edited: October 16, 2020, 05:52:27 PM by Monstro Believes in a Blue Texas & a Blue Georgia »

Have to say, Texas' voter suppression effort isn't going well...

They've certainly worked to add confusion to the dropbox issue, which I guess was the objective?

Regardless, it feels like the Texas GOP are tripping over themselves towards a bad Election night. If anything, all their suppression efforts seem to be doing is increasing Dem turnout/enthusiasm and banking Dem votes even earlier, while also signalling to the nation in big letters "Texas is a purple state".


In a roundabout way.....this was actually good for Biden  Wink
Logged
Stockdale for Veep
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #516 on: October 16, 2020, 05:50:00 PM »

Fully expecting early voting to be gutted in certain states in the next few years.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #517 on: October 16, 2020, 09:34:07 PM »

Texas limits by-mail early voting to:
   (1) Those over 65.
   (2) Those with disabilities.
   (3) Those who are incarcerated (non-felons awaiting trial in jail)
   (4) Those who will be outside the county for the entire early-voting period.

I'm actually way more mad about the 5th Circuit's (and I think at least one other circuit's) ruling on that. Drop boxes are at least debatable but that's a blatant violation of the plain text of the Constitution. The 26th Amendment was worded identically to the 15th Amendment, so it demands the same level of scrutiny that would be given to an explicit whites-only absentee voting law. (Though maybe I shouldn't expect that the court would stop that either.)
Texas has never had "drop boxes". A mail voter could take their ballot to the county clerk on election day, and after showing an ID, could hand deliver it. Most voters, like, mailed their mail ballot.

You'd think that if someone thought that the 26th Amendment was applicable, they would have filed suit in the past 48 years. I'm pretty sure someone would have filed suit against a mail ballot for whites-only before 1913, or a male-only mail (male?) ballot before 1968.

Texas could simply eliminate the dispensation for those over 65. Many elderly have mobility or other disabilities.






Your tirade completely ignores the fundamental equal protection issue of limiting one ballot drop box, however you wish to label it per County weather. County is 169 resident Loving County or. Nearly 5 million populated Harris County.

Surely even a conspiracy theorist who had it on with the most point and laugh absurd Notions during the entire North Carolina 9th District voting fraud - - can understand that this is pure and simple voter suppression designed to minimize Democrats chances to vote in crowded urban areas versus Republicans in smaller counties? Do you even attempt to deny this?
Mail ballots are intended to be mailed. There are dozens of post offices in Harris County. Or a voter can go to in-person voting, surrender their mail ballot and vote in person.

There is no reason to have more than one location for in-person return of ballots -essentially the same place that you mail your ballots to.

PS You didn't happen to catch the SNAFU about the Pledge of Allegiance at the Bladen County Board of Elections. After the Democrats took control of the board, they decided to drop the Pledge from their agenda. After they voted down adding it back to the agenda, a citizen got up and started reciting the pledge. The Democrats sat their fuming. Another person stormed out of the room giving what appears to be the National Socialist salute to the USA flag.

PPS McCrae Dowless is running for re-election.

Garbage. Pure unadulterated garbage. Even by your profound lack of logic and general inability to engage in critical thinking, this is garbage.

That's the Prelude. Here's the details. Mail-in ballots as you call them do not need to be mailed in. I'm going to be dropping mine off in person at the Board of Elections because I am fortunate enough that it is not terribly far from a location I have to be at multiple times a week for one of my kids sporting events. Your silliness fails to comprehend that the ballot drop-off boxes are being used. This is not a matter of getting rid of them because Jim text decided in his infinite Collective weirdo reasoning that dropping them off in any other way than u.s. mail is somehow required.

 But we do have them, Jim. Which brings back to the same question as to why it is remotely not violative of equal protection, or let's be frank just out-and-out blatant attempt to depress voting in Democratic areas, by giving the same opportunity to a county with 169 residents to one with five and a half million. So you would say that it would be equally fair to have the same number of polling places Per County regardless of population as well?

Don't answer that. A partisan Pro voter suppression hack like yourself absolutely would.

You inartfully dodge the question and instead went on some inane tirade about Bladen County. In terms of Defending Your Position, you have effectively soiled the bed. Go to sleep. Stop posting. Delete your account.

Good day sir!
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,333
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #518 on: October 16, 2020, 11:10:42 PM »

Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #519 on: October 17, 2020, 12:10:17 AM »



95% duplicates
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #520 on: October 17, 2020, 12:15:01 AM »



95% duplicates

The headline is worse than it actually is. I do feel bad for the election clerks who have to deal with all of this. Probably why we are lacking results from some of those Philadelphia collar counties.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #521 on: October 17, 2020, 01:41:52 AM »



95% duplicates

How does one get issued a duplicate absentee ballot to mail in? Huh
Logged
Hnv1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,526


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #522 on: October 17, 2020, 02:34:52 AM »


What does that mean? Can this people vote in person of their mail ballot was rejected or did PA just lose 320k votes?
Logged
Pulaski
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 690


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #523 on: October 17, 2020, 06:37:44 AM »


What does that mean? Can this people vote in person of their mail ballot was rejected or did PA just lose 320k votes?

Most of the people it applies to had already included an application for a mail-in ballot when they voted in the primary, so these new ones they did afterwards have been rejected, but presumably they'll still get mail-in ballots as they applied.
Logged
Lognog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,398
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #524 on: October 17, 2020, 10:27:18 AM »



95% duplicates

Yeah I don't think this is a big deal tbh. I live in PA and my girlfriend requested an absentee ballot on line and through the mail. They aren't going to send two so they invalidated the first one that was sent. I wouldn't lose sleep over this
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 86  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.075 seconds with 12 queries.