CDC: Full Reopening of Schools and Colleges Presents 'Highest Risk' for Spread of COVID-19

[Del Tachi]

Trump and his cultists don't give a sh**t about the lives of kids, teachers, parents, or the quality of their education. The only reason they want schools to reopen is because it will lead to some resemblance of normality that will help his reelection bid.

So at-home, online instruction is "higher quality" than traditional schooling?  When so many kids have s[inks]t parents/adults in their life who don't care whether they learn or not?

The Left is tripping over itself to keep the most disadvantaged kids in America away from critical resources and education all in an attempt to "own" Donald Trump and Republicans.

[Del Tachi]

For anyone actually interested (i.e., not any of the liberal posters on this site), here's the document.

It's really just a summary of what strategies schools/IHLs have been considering so far, while reiterating existing CDC guidance for educational institutions from May.

In the context of the document, the phrase "highest risk" (which only occurs once in reference to K12 schools, on page 2, and once again for IHLs on page 7) is used only to compare full reopening to virtual or hybrid learning.  Full reopening is only the "highest risk" relative to alternative strategies; the CDC does not call it "high risk" in a vacuum.

And people wonder why conservative have a problem with the fake news media?  NYTimes took a single document, extracted two words out of context, and then built a narrative that President Trump and Republicans are culpable for child deaths that haven't happened yet.
 

[Del Tachi]

NYTimes took a single document, extracted two words out of context, and then built a narrative that President Trump and Republicans are culpable for child deaths that haven't happened yet.
 

... but THEY WILL, or rather, the children will get others killed via infection. Your argument is equivelant to "they say they're going to drop a big bomb on the city, and the fake news built a narratibe around civilian deaths that haven't happened yet." They will happen.

Your reasoning that THEY WILL is based on the fake news narrative that articles like this expose, not anything the CDC, scientists or real-world evidence would suggest.  Your idea of WHAT WOULD happen is based only in the panic narratives publishers peddle to garner the most clicks. 

Did you even read the document linked above?  or is it too science-y for you?