NJ-08: Oseguara vs. Sires (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:10:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NJ-08: Oseguara vs. Sires (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NJ-08: Oseguara vs. Sires  (Read 538 times)
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,760


« on: July 02, 2020, 03:41:25 PM »
« edited: July 02, 2020, 03:44:36 PM by Pollster »

This is a district that has seen a lot of new voters come in/old voters leave, so certainly possible Sires' name recognition has gone down. In primaries where everybody has low name rec, having the ballot in front of you for weeks does give voters plenty of time to become familiar with all of the candidates on their own terms.

Still, as I mentioned in another thread, I'll believe an NJ primary challenger winning when I see it. Sires is, by far, the worst of the NJ Dems in totally safe seats, so nice to see him getting at least a small scare.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,760


« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2020, 03:55:43 PM »

This is a district that has seen a lot of new voters come in/old voters come out, so certainly possible Sires' name recognition has gone down. In primaries where everybody has low name rec, having the ballot in front of you for weeks does give voters plenty of time to become familiar with all of the candidates on their own terms.

Still, as I mentioned in another thread, I'll believe an NJ primary challenger winning when I see it. Sires is, by far, the worst of the NJ Dems in totally safe seats, so nice to see him getting at least a small scare.

What’s wrong with Sires?

This is blatantly my opinion, he's to my right considerably on multiple issues, specifically foreign policy.

My guess is Oseguera is peaking too late and, at best, will perform similarly to Booker rather than Bowman. The structural obstacles in place against defeating the machine's choice in NJ exacerbates this.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,760


« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2020, 04:30:37 PM »

This is a district that has seen a lot of new voters come in/old voters come out, so certainly possible Sires' name recognition has gone down. In primaries where everybody has low name rec, having the ballot in front of you for weeks does give voters plenty of time to become familiar with all of the candidates on their own terms.

Still, as I mentioned in another thread, I'll believe an NJ primary challenger winning when I see it. Sires is, by far, the worst of the NJ Dems in totally safe seats, so nice to see him getting at least a small scare.

What’s wrong with Sires?

This is blatantly my opinion, he's to my right considerably on multiple issues, specifically foreign policy.

My guess is Oseguera is peaking too late and, at best, will perform similarly to Booker rather than Bowman. The structural obstacles in place against defeating the machine's choice in NJ exacerbates this.

Like someone else said, I'll believe a New Jersey primary challenger defeating the machine when I see it. However, if there is any NJ seat where the primary succeeds, it's going to be here since Sires is sitting in a demographic time bomb. If this was a different state he probably would have lost to a Hispanic challenger a long time ago. 

Sires is Cuban, has a distinct accent, and speaks fluent Spanish. The Cuban population in the district are pretty contained to the northern part near Union City, North Bergen, and Sires' native West New York. So long as these constituencies remain in Sires' district, he's probably safe.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.