538 model & poll tracker thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 06:46:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  538 model & poll tracker thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 ... 40
Author Topic: 538 model & poll tracker thread  (Read 58232 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,994


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #775 on: October 08, 2020, 12:20:34 PM »

Biden now at 85.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #776 on: October 08, 2020, 04:12:02 PM »

Today or tomorrow, Biden will probably cross from "Favored" to "Clearly Favored"

I think the "Clearly Favored" threshold is 90%. I'm sure range of expected outcomes will narrow as we get closer to election day, but I don't know if it will happen that quickly.

A continued onslaught of Biden +10% polls might do the trick, though.
Logged
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #777 on: October 08, 2020, 04:39:08 PM »

I don't know why they're acting so confident.  They were wrong in 2016 and could definitely be wrong again.

Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,273
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #778 on: October 08, 2020, 04:47:19 PM »

They were wrong in 2016 and could definitely be wrong again.

Come on man, you're smarter than this
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,927


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #779 on: October 08, 2020, 04:48:19 PM »

I don't know why they're acting so confident.  They were wrong in 2016 and could definitely be wrong again.



They weren't technically wrong. Saying something has a 31% chance of happenning that actually does end up happenning isn't wrong, and vise-versa with 69%. Also; the certainty for their 2020 model is far lower than their 2016 model, and yet it outputs Biden as a clear favorite. Statistical models aren't meant to be prefect; they're supposed to show where a race stands based upon the available data and how the model interprets that data. In my view, at least statistical models are better than speculative models since they are based on cold hard facts, and in general, well put together statistical models tend to hold up better than speculative models.
Logged
Astatine
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,884


Political Matrix
E: -0.72, S: -5.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #780 on: October 08, 2020, 05:01:50 PM »

I don't know why they're acting so confident.  They were wrong in 2016 and could definitely be wrong again.



They weren't technically wrong. Saying something has a 31% chance of happenning that actually does end up happenning isn't wrong, and vise-versa with 69%. Also; the certainty for their 2020 model is far lower than their 2016 model, and yet it outputs Biden as a clear favorite. Statistical models aren't meant to be prefect; they're supposed to show where a race stands based upon the available data and how the model interprets that data. In my view, at least statistical models are better than speculative models since they are based on cold hard facts, and in general, well put together statistical models tend to hold up better than speculative models.
This.

When a candidate has a 15 % chance of winning, why do many interpret that as if he has already lost?

Dying in the first round of a Russian roulette game is about as probable, so according to that logic, why bother about possibly dying when the chances are "just 17 %"?
Logged
ultraviolet
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.71, S: -3.22

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #781 on: October 08, 2020, 05:07:20 PM »

I could be wrong but I think MacArthur is doing some sort of mocking? He lectures us all the time on stuff like this so
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,994


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #782 on: October 08, 2020, 05:09:25 PM »

I don't know why they're acting so confident.  They were wrong in 2016 and could definitely be wrong again.



They weren't technically wrong. Saying something has a 31% chance of happenning that actually does end up happenning isn't wrong, and vise-versa with 69%. Also; the certainty for their 2020 model is far lower than their 2016 model, and yet it outputs Biden as a clear favorite. Statistical models aren't meant to be prefect; they're supposed to show where a race stands based upon the available data and how the model interprets that data. In my view, at least statistical models are better than speculative models since they are based on cold hard facts, and in general, well put together statistical models tend to hold up better than speculative models.
This.

When a candidate has a 15 % chance of winning, why do many interpret that as if he has already lost?

Dying in the first round of a Russian roulette game is about as probable, so according to that logic, why bother about possibly dying when the chances are "just 17 %"?

Exactly.  One way I like to help people visualize small probabilities (we were talking about an estimated 1% chance of dying from COVID) was this: would you go to a game at Sanford Stadium (the University of Georgia's football stadium, which seats 90,000) if they announced they were going to randomly choose 900 of the people there to be killed afterward?
Logged
Meclazine for Israel
Meclazine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,022
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #783 on: October 08, 2020, 05:14:45 PM »

I think Trump is dust.

The COVID-19 infection was the nail in the coffin for undecided voters.
Logged
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #784 on: October 08, 2020, 05:33:08 PM »

You guys are all bashing me and the joke went right over your head.  Read the Fivey Fox quote box.
Logged
Interlocutor is just not there yet
Interlocutor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,204


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #785 on: October 08, 2020, 05:40:10 PM »

Ugh that Rasmussen TX poll is keeping Trump from falling below 70%
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #786 on: October 08, 2020, 05:52:01 PM »

Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,802
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #787 on: October 08, 2020, 06:17:11 PM »

Some of us just do it the hard way and use MS Paint. Everything more difficult than that for me might as well require a Comp Sci degree.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,770
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #788 on: October 08, 2020, 06:21:19 PM »

Some of us just do it the hard way and use MS Paint. Everything more difficult than that for me might as well require a Comp Sci degree.

I don't even know how to do things like this in MS Paint. So you're still more tech-savvy than I am.

I still haven't figured out how to post images and maps on this very forum, and I've been here over two years!
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #789 on: October 08, 2020, 10:51:04 PM »

Fivey Fox is cringy as hell but the parodies are cringier.
Logged
Interlocutor is just not there yet
Interlocutor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,204


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #790 on: October 09, 2020, 12:48:37 AM »

0.4% popular vote gap in Georgia now, closest it's ever been

Again, that damn 'Incumbency and Economics' caveat
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #791 on: October 09, 2020, 02:52:07 AM »

0.4% popular vote gap in Georgia now, closest it's ever been

Again, that damn 'Incumbency and Economics' caveat

We haven't had a GA poll since Trump tested positive.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,781


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #792 on: October 09, 2020, 03:09:26 AM »

0.4% popular vote gap in Georgia now, closest it's ever been

Again, that damn 'Incumbency and Economics' caveat

The "Incumbency and Economics" factor is falling fast now. I think Silver said recently that Trump would be at 5% if the election were now with these polls.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #793 on: October 09, 2020, 08:26:16 AM »

Biden's national lead now over ten points in the 538 tracker:



I think this is the first time he's had a lead of at least ten points nationally?
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,927


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #794 on: October 09, 2020, 08:26:42 AM »

I am so happy.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #795 on: October 09, 2020, 08:46:30 AM »

Biden's national lead now over ten points in the 538 tracker:



I think this is the first time he's had a lead of at least ten points nationally?

I believe it is.

I'm wondering if Clinton's 6.5 point lead was partially due to Access Hollywood two days previous. Her bump from that peaked at 7.1% (RCP), then crashed after Comey announced he was taking a close-up look at Weiner.

That brings up another point: Oct, 2016 was a crazy month of bombshell news stories and constantly swinging undecideds. 2020 is the polar opposite of that. Biden has led by 6 points or more since George Floyd, and I can't imagine anything short of Biden being incapacitated dropping his lead below 6 points between now and the election.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #796 on: October 09, 2020, 09:15:03 AM »

I wonder how long Biden's polling average margin needs to stay north of 10 points before the odds of a Biden landslide ticks up to 50%. It's currently at 36%.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,681


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #797 on: October 09, 2020, 09:24:21 AM »

Biden's national lead now over ten points in the 538 tracker:



I think this is the first time he's had a lead of at least ten points nationally?

I believe it is.

I'm wondering if Clinton's 6.5 point lead was partially due to Access Hollywood two days previous. Her bump from that peaked at 7.1% (RCP), then crashed after Comey announced he was taking a close-up look at Weiner.

That brings up another point: Oct, 2016 was a crazy month of bombshell news stories and constantly swinging undecideds. 2020 is the polar opposite of that. Biden has led by 6 points or more since George Floyd, and I can't imagine anything short of Biden being incapacitated dropping his lead below 6 points between now and the election.

Well plus, even when Clinton has a +6.5 lead, it's only like 46.5-40.0 with crazy amounts of undecideds.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #798 on: October 09, 2020, 09:32:00 AM »

Here's 538's national tracker for 2016. Purely in terms of margin, the chart does give some hope to the GOP in that Clinton had a 7-point lead at one point in October. But, as has been discussed a lot on this forum, Biden has a more stable lead and has almost always been above 50% since mid-June, whereas Clinton peaked at 46% in late October.
Logged
American2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,512
Côte d'Ivoire


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #799 on: October 09, 2020, 10:17:25 AM »

It's tossup in Georgia now.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/georgia/
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 ... 40  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 13 queries.