CNN/SSRS: Biden + 14% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:01:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  CNN/SSRS: Biden + 14% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CNN/SSRS: Biden + 14%  (Read 15980 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

« on: June 08, 2020, 11:53:21 AM »

Teflon Joe!

This is awesome!
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2020, 07:17:27 PM »

I mean even someone like me is leaning towards voting for Biden in the general election at this point (rather than Green or whatever) so that should tell you something. It has nothing to do with Biden and everything to do with Trump.

Same here.  

Whatever it takes to boot that man from the White House.  
and you call yourself a Republican? Please...


Its only a super recent thing that Republicans vote Republicans no matter what and Democrats vote Democratic no matter what.


Look at how elastic the map was from 1960-1980 and you would see that many Republicans and Democrats would vote the other party from time to time. Thats how it should be , politics ain't sports and we arent supposed to vote based on party here but based on the candidate themselves.
Democratic party is for defunding the police and late term abortion. This is not your grandfathers democratic party.

Joe Biden wants to defund the police? That'd be shocking news to Joe Biden.
At least he said no now he is waffling and says there should be conditional funding which is pretty similar to defunding
You shouldn't be on a political forum if you don't have a modicum of understanding how policy works. Period.
He didn't unequivocally say he is against defunding. He gave a nuanced position on conditional funding. Police need to be supported 100%. Maybe have stricter screenings but nothing cut in terms of funding. If anything this country needs more police esp in cities with high crime.

You absolute fool


He's talking about federal aide to local departments being tied to you know...respecting human decency. It has nothing to do with states and localities funding their own police departments.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.