S.20.2-17: Keeping Our Schools Safe from the Surveillance State Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:43:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S.20.2-17: Keeping Our Schools Safe from the Surveillance State Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S.20.2-17: Keeping Our Schools Safe from the Surveillance State Act (Passed)  (Read 678 times)
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,865
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



« on: June 08, 2020, 06:34:32 PM »

As someone who has been in a situation where I was assaulted by bullies on school grounds, and successfully took them to court with the help of surveillance footage on the school's camera system, I fail to see how this bill is even remotely necessary other than the Governor memeing about "muhhh all surveillance is bad and violates privacy".

Surveillance cameras can also be helpful in school districts facing problems with violence and gang activity in schools.

There is no real need for this bill to exist.
Cameras can help in that situation, I'll admit that. But so can planting mics on every student or ankle-braceleting them to see what location they were in or bugging every hallway. It's a slippery slope.

Every student should have the right to a good education and a good education means one where they're not being constantly recorded by the school administration, with metal detectors at the gate and cameras in every hallway making it like the inside of a prison. "Crime prevention" is just an excuse to introduce a new step in the rapidly expanding surveillance state.
Logged
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,865
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2020, 01:01:28 AM »

Students who go to schools with cameras increasingly put a lack of trust in their schools and cameras also create the feeling of an invasion of privacy - both for students and for teachers.

Students who go to schools with heavy surveillance actually have a moderate decrease in their academic performance. Maybe just maybe because it creates the feeling of a prison? Where your every move is being watched?

The difference between cameras in school and a place like say, Target is that 1) school is a required place to go, nobody is forcing anybody to go to Target. For a legal requirement it should at least come with a modest expectation of privacy. The excessive punishment systems that many schools use are in fact a violation of constitutional rights in many cases. 2) a store or restaurant has one main goal: to make money. Of course they'd use many different methods to make sure they don't lose money including setting up cameras to deter shoplifters. The goal of a school should be to provide an education. Nobody needs a camera to get a good education.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.