Harrison and McGrath lead April's ActBlue donations
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:00:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Harrison and McGrath lead April's ActBlue donations
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Harrison and McGrath lead April's ActBlue donations  (Read 2139 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,817
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: June 06, 2020, 12:21:00 AM »

McGrath probably would have been better suited trying to run against Barr again, but she can win in Kentucky, because McConnell is just so unpopular nationally, and in state.

I'd tie him to Bevin (since tying him to Trump probably won't work as well.) if I were running her campaign.

I don't think donating to Harrison is lighting money on fire (he's got a better chance to win than Doug Jones), but he's a heavy underdog against Lindsey Graham, and he's less likely to win than McGrath is.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: June 06, 2020, 12:32:05 AM »

McGrath probably would have been better suited trying to run against Barr again, but she can win in Kentucky, because McConnell is just so unpopular nationally, and in state.

I'd tie him to Bevin (since tying him to Trump probably won't work as well.) if I were running her campaign.

I don't think donating to Harrison is lighting money on fire (he's got a better chance to win than Doug Jones), but he's a heavy underdog against Lindsey Graham, and he's less likely to win than McGrath is.

McGrath’s problem is that she is incredibly, transparently wishy-washy and flip-floppity. Right out of the gate she contradicted herself on the Kavanaugh vote. She’s repeatedly contradicted herself on Trump since then. She won’t energize liberals, she won’t do enough to win over Trump voters, she won’t unify Kentuckians the way Beshear did, and she won’t play as well in coal country as Adkins would have. Basically she is the worst of all worlds.

I actually think she is a weaker nominee than McConnell’s last challenger, Allison Grimes, was. I really do not get why Schumer thought someone who lost one of the most winnable swing districts of 2018 — a district that Jim Gray won handily in 2016, that Beshear won by double digits in 2019, and that polls show Biden is winning by double digits as well this year — was such a great candidate. She already proved she was not a great candidate against Barr; if she hadn’t edged him out in the primaries, Jim Gray (who I voted for) would probably be my representative right now. Amy’s campaign (which relied on a “high ground” strategy) was just abysmal in 2018, and despite the strong fundraising I don’t see much sign she’s improved since then. If she learned anything from last time, she might well have had a better shot in a repeat against Barr (who she almost beat despite the terrible campaign), but then again I see little sign she has learned anything.

I really, REALLY wish it had been Adkins. From what I have heard from people in the know, he had personal reasons not to run. But it’s still a shame. Because Amy simply ain’t gonna win. The more “progressive” candidates running against her won’t either. At this point I don’t really care which it is because all are doomed, but at least the other two seem more principled than Amy.
Logged
Epaminondas
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,770


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: June 06, 2020, 01:10:47 AM »
« Edited: June 06, 2020, 04:18:35 AM by Epaminondas »

It seems that in the Trump era, every single Democrat is receiving orders of magniture more money than previous races, regardless of candidate quality.
This could be a unique opportunity to measure how much difference a windfall truly makes. I could imagine a trendline of +.5% for every million over your opponent in a house race.


McGrath’s problem is that she is incredibly, transparently wishy-washy and flip-floppity.

It's a testament to the power of Internet anonymity that you can boldly affirm this about McGrath while religiously supporting the far more inconstant still Biden.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.