WI-Marquette: Biden +3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:47:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  WI-Marquette: Biden +3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-Marquette: Biden +3  (Read 2599 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


« on: May 12, 2020, 12:44:19 PM »

Trump virus approval: 44/51 (-7)
Trump job approval: 47/49 (-2)

31% strongly approve, 42% strongly disapprove

Joe Biden fav: 42/46 (-4)
Bernie Sanders fav: 40/48 (-8)
Trump fav: 44/51 (-7)
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2020, 12:47:23 PM »

Wow, the Biden seniors thing is real. The subsample of 60+ was nearly 300 voters, so it's a pretty good sample actually.

For favorability - though, I think it's underselling him a bit for 30-59 (18-29 is understandable since most are probably Bernie ppl still upset)

18-29: 38/48
30-44: 35/54
45-59: 34/51
60+: 55/37
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2020, 12:53:05 PM »

Comparing with the exits in 2016, it looks like this would be like Biden +5 judging by the shifts. Biden winning Whites by 2 when Trump won them by 11 would signal to me more of a 3-4 pt shift? Meanwhile, the samples for 60+ are more reliable than the 30-44 sample so I'm gonna say that the 30-44 sample here, that has Trump +12 (Clinton +18 in 2016) is likely underselling Biden.

Judging from the crosstabs, it would appear Biden has a lot more upside.

Males: Trump +18 (Trump +14 in 2016)
Females: Biden +22 (Clinton +10 in 2016)

18-29: Biden +10 (Clinton +3 in 2016)
30-44: Trump +12 (Clinton +18 in 2016)
45-59: Trump +7 (Trump +15 in 2016)
60+: Biden +18 (Trump +1 in 2016)

Indies: Biden +10 (Trump +10 in 2016)

Whites: Trump +2 (Trump +11 in 2016)
Blacks: Biden +87 (Clinton +86 in 2016)
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2020, 06:46:51 PM »

Is there a likely explanation for the massive swing in 30-44 year-olds other than undecideds? It just seems like too huge of a swing to be accounted for purely by an unfortunately inaccurate sampling of voters.

I think it's just a bad sample. Clinton and Evers both won this group pretty handily (+10%)
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,229


« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2020, 06:36:49 AM »

State polls weren't necessarily that bad in 2016, but they had a LOT of undecideds, which made the races very unsure - and those undecideds largely went for Trump
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.