2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: California

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

[I’m not Stu]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

[I’m not Stu]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

[I’m not Stu]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

That's a fine map. What should be done with Fresno?

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

That's a fine map. What should be done with Fresno?

In my map or yours?

[I’m not Stu]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

That's a fine map. What should be done with Fresno?

In my map or yours?

In your map. Here's my Fresno map.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

That's a fine map. What should be done with Fresno?

In my map or yours?

In your map. Here's my Fresno map.

I really like your Central Valley.
As the moment the Fresno question is unanswerable because I'm drawing the Bay Area and I'm going from north to south.
What does your Oakland CD look like?

[I’m not Stu]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

That isn't too objectionable.

[I’m not Stu]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

That isn't too objectionable.

Three Hispanic districts, two VRA and one opportunity. CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18 (opportunity): Clinton +8
CA-19 (VRA): Clinton +13
CA-20 (VRA): Clinton +13

[Coastal Elitist]

I don't see much of a point in splitting Amador.

The Placer CD was about 8k short population-wise. That being said I could delete that split.

I think a different map might help. Trinity can go with the Emerald Coast, but I thhink Napa shouldn't go with Marin

I really like the districts you get in "Jefferson" with this arrangement. Napa in with Marin also helps the Yolo district take in all of Butte.

What does the map look like now?

After the Amador and Yuba changes?

Yes.

Here.

That's a fine map. What should be done with Fresno?

No absolutely not Redding should not be paired with the Emerald Coast what is happening with this map it's just ugh

[Coastal Elitist]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

That isn't too objectionable.

Three Hispanic districts, two VRA and one opportunity. CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18 (opportunity): Clinton +8
CA-19 (VRA): Clinton +13
CA-20 (VRA): Clinton +13

Here's my Central Valley map:
CA-22 is basically the new 21

[I’m not Stu]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

That isn't too objectionable.

Three Hispanic districts, two VRA and one opportunity. CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18 (opportunity): Clinton +8
CA-19 (VRA): Clinton +13
CA-20 (VRA): Clinton +13

Here's my Central Valley map:
CA-22 is basically the new 21

CVAP and Democratic margin of victory in CA-21 and CA-22? That CA-21 takes in many heavily white precincts.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I quickly whipped this up.

[Coastal Elitist]

I don't have Oakland yet. Here's Bakersfield and Fresno.

That isn't too objectionable.

Three Hispanic districts, two VRA and one opportunity. CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18 (opportunity): Clinton +8
CA-19 (VRA): Clinton +13
CA-20 (VRA): Clinton +13

Here's my Central Valley map:
CA-22 is basically the new 21

CVAP and Democratic margin of victory?

CA-21: 43% Hispanic Trump +11
CA-22: 50% Hispanic Clinton +20
CA-23: 42% Hispanic Trump +10

[I’m not Stu]

I quickly whipped this up.

CVAP and Democratic margin of victory?

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

The single most different thing I'm toying with re: the Central Valley is having San Benito County in with the Central Valley districts.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

I quickly whipped this up.

CVAP and Democratic margin of victory?

Stanislaus: 35% Hispanic, 48-46 Clinton, EVEN
Fresno: 54% Hispanic, 54-41 Clinton, D+4
Bakersfield: 57% Hispanic, 52-42 Clinton, D+2

[Coastal Elitist]

The single most different thing I'm toying with re: the Central Valley is having San Benito County in with the Central Valley districts.

You can't do that there are no road connections. Also you have to put Alpine with El Dorado the only road connection goes through there. Regardless San Benito does not go with the Central Valley

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

The single most different thing I'm toying with re: the Central Valley is having San Benito County in with the Central Valley districts.

You can't do that there are no road connections. Also you have to put Alpine with El Dorado the only road connection goes through there. Regardless San Benito does not go with the Central Valley

That is false. Google Maps shows three roads crossing San Benito's eastern border.
Fair point in regards to Alpine County. I'll revise that.

[Coastal Elitist]

The single most different thing I'm toying with re: the Central Valley is having San Benito County in with the Central Valley districts.

You can't do that there are no road connections. Also you have to put Alpine with El Dorado the only road connection goes through there. Regardless San Benito does not go with the Central Valley

That is false. Google Maps shows three roads crossing San Benito's eastern border.
Fair point in regards to Alpine County. I'll revise that.

Ok I see one now. Anyways it's not a COI to the Central Valley, San Benito belongs with the Central Coast. Those mountains shouldn't be crossed.

[I’m not Stu]

CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18: 51-43 Clinton
CA-19: 54-41 Clinton
CA-20: 54-41 Clinton

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

CA-20 is an open seat. Where do Costa and Cox run?

CA-18: 51-43 Clinton
CA-19: 54-41 Clinton
CA-20: 54-41 Clinton

Costa in 19, Cox in 20, if I had to guess.