Why current trends won’t last past 2028 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:05:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why current trends won’t last past 2028 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why current trends won’t last past 2028  (Read 2319 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
« on: May 02, 2020, 03:42:41 PM »

They will eventually break out of this by competing well enough in IL and the NYC suburbs. 
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,662
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2020, 08:31:56 PM »
« Edited: May 02, 2020, 08:38:50 PM by Skill and Chance »

If Republicans lose 2020, 2024, and maybe 2028 they will have no choice but to change strategy. Personally I don't see it happen. McConnell has appointed people onto the court like crazy for a reason.

There are still many tricks they can use to prevent this scenario from happening. They can purge voter rolls, limit early voting, reduce the number of polling stations in urban areas. Implement tougher voter ID laws and close down DMVs in counties in the black belt and along the Rio Grande. Although a lot of that depends on if Roberts can repeal the VRA. If that is done I think if Republicans regain their supermajorities in TX, GA, and NC in a possible Biden midterm in 2022 then assuming they loose in 2024 they could possibly get a District Method plan on the ballot in a 2026 midterm. Assuming 2026 is in line with 2006 and 2014 they may be able to get majorities. This will essentially cut in half whatever Democrats win in TX and GA allowing them to go on the offensive in states like DE, CT, RI, and FL.

And what about the Senate?
Don't the Democrats need to win the senate too, they have to change their strategies too.

Republicans have a long history of under performing in the Senate compared to expectations and this has allowed the Democrats to get and keep majorities they should not have been able to hold. Part of this is precisely because of the Republican agenda on things like health care. Trump can win Ohio by double digits on trade and then Sherrod Brown can turn around and win it by emphasizing healthcare.

A local good ole boy running on Medicaid and minimum wage will do better then a Koch brothers backed shill in a Senate race even as the state is going hella Republican because of trade, immigration, abortion and/or guns.

This is true for now, but eventually they will catch on and start running Hawleys throughout the Rust Belt.  I really do think the senate situation soon becomes untenable for Democrats (probably the next time there is an R wave with Class I) and forces their hand on pursuing the West over the South.  I think Dems will get Georgia anyway because Atlanta is moving toward them so fast, but it looks likely to me that Republicans will get to 20+% of the black vote pretty soon.  That basically seals the deal outside of Georgia, Virginia and Texas.

On the other hand, what happened in Colorado seems to be spreading to AZ and MT, and there is serious potential to flip the Mormon vote down the line as Bush era social issues fade from view.

I'm envisioning something like this for a close Dem win in say 2040.



If I'm wrong and the black vote doesn't shift much but the Latino vote does, we might eventually get something like this:



One important takeaway from this is that Republicans don't have much of a future without a clear edge in Florida.

 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.