New Hampshire 2020 Redistricting
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 09:14:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  New Hampshire 2020 Redistricting
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8
Author Topic: New Hampshire 2020 Redistricting  (Read 12031 times)
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 01, 2020, 10:37:46 AM »

If the NH Pubs don't want to cause too much backlash, I would expect them to keep the general split of the state but perhaps move Manchester over to CD 2 and replace it with other more favorable towns. With about an hour's effort I was able to push the 2012/2016 PVI in CD 1 up to R+4 while keeping the basic geography of the current CDs. No towns are chopped and the deviation is down to 4.

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,722
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 01, 2020, 02:30:27 PM »

Pappas lives in Manchester and Manchester has been in NH-1 literally forever.   I mean, Republicans can do what they want but moving Manchester to NH-2 is a bold move.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 01, 2020, 03:34:52 PM »

Pappas lives in Manchester and Manchester has been in NH-1 literally forever.   I mean, Republicans can do what they want but moving Manchester to NH-2 is a bold move.

If they want to be less bold and keep Manchester in CD 1 it would cost them a point of PVI.

Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,722
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 02, 2020, 07:28:47 PM »

Looking at the state senate, it seems R's can effectively pack the D's down to 10 districts, but that doesn't actually mean a guaranteed majority.   The D packs will be

1 Lebanon/Hanover
1 Keene
1 Concord
2 Manchester
2 Nashua
3 Seacoast

Their problem will be western Hillborough, especially if it keeps trending D.  There's really no way to chop up the areas that vote D.  Nashua is to the southeast, Manchester to east, New London area to the north, Keene/Monadnock area to the west, and western Hillsborough already votes D when looking at the 2020 presidential numbers.

They could "try" to only make 2 seacoast districts, but that would endanger SD-23 and they'd risk giving the D's 4 seats instead.  In the map I made SD-23 is only 53.9% Trump to 44.5% Biden.

This is what I came up with,  really trying to guess what NHGOP will do

https://davesredistricting.org/join/3c594804-cdc8-4d67-8993-f179b75dc749








Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,269
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2020, 09:10:18 PM »

Pappas lives in Manchester and Manchester has been in NH-1 literally forever.   I mean, Republicans can do what they want but moving Manchester to NH-2 is a bold move.
Doesn't NH require least-change in its CDs?
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,722
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2020, 10:39:44 PM »

Pappas lives in Manchester and Manchester has been in NH-1 literally forever.   I mean, Republicans can do what they want but moving Manchester to NH-2 is a bold move.
Doesn't NH require least-change in its CDs?

There's literally no state laws regarding the congressional districts at all (they aren't even mentioned in the state constitution).

There's a few paragraphs about the state legislative districts, mostly they can't divide towns and wards and have to be equal population, but that's about it.

Otherwise it's a free for all,  not including traditional norms and all.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2020, 03:31:58 PM »

Fair MapTM

Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2020, 05:23:10 PM »

I always thought the fairest map would have a compact southeastern district but that's just me.

Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 06, 2020, 05:38:57 PM »

I went for competitiveness given its NH and there's only two districts.
Logged
Starry Eyed Jagaloon
Blairite
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,835
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 06, 2020, 05:43:11 PM »

I went for competitiveness given its NH and there's only two districts.

Both of mine are essentially 50-50.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 06, 2020, 05:51:36 PM »

I went for competitiveness given its NH and there's only two districts.

Both of mine are essentially 50-50.

Not bad, not bad. Looks like towns are kept whole as well. I like it.
Logged
Continential
The Op
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,616
Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -5.30

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: January 26, 2021, 02:02:38 PM »
« Edited: January 26, 2021, 02:06:16 PM by Ishan »


This is my second DRA map.


District 1 is Republicans 51.9% Democrats 45.0% and District 2 is Democrats 51.2% Republicans 45.6%
source
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,872
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: January 26, 2021, 02:38:05 PM »

That's going to be a dummymander by the end of the decade with that much of the suburban MA border area in NH-01.  It's probably better for the GOP to put everything north of Hanover in NH-01 and make NH-02 L-shaped from Hanover-Keene-Nashua and maybe even Portsmouth if that is viable. 
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,689


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 21, 2021, 05:03:08 PM »

Challenge draw a map that has both 2 Clinton districts that also voted for Hassan in 2016.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,781


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 21, 2021, 05:18:53 PM »

If you get really messy, its possible to draw a whole Towns Trump + 12 in 2016 and Trump + 5 in 2020 seat in New Hampshire. Not going to post the map here just in case someone in the NH Republican party is seeing this though.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,112
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 23, 2021, 08:22:40 AM »
« Edited: May 23, 2021, 11:32:10 AM by Torie »

He is my Pubmander submission without chopping towns or cities that seems the least ugly, while of course still being ugly.



And another slightly less nasty looking which might actually be in play perhaps.

Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,883
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 23, 2021, 04:49:07 PM »

Challenge draw a map that has both 2 Clinton districts that also voted for Hassan in 2016.

Interestingly this is a challenge that sounds hard but is surprisingly easy. You don't even need some horrible gerrymander, even a clean map will do



https://davesredistricting.org/join/ef9f8153-aad5-4bea-bb9e-312d509ffd4a

The blue district voted Hillary Clinton by 0.6% and Hassan by 0.2%

The green district voted Hillary Clinton by 0.1% (464 votes) and Hassan by under 0.1% (154 votes)
Logged
Spectator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,564
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 28, 2021, 12:22:40 PM »

The most Republican district I can make possible is a Trump 2020 51-45 seat that is extremely ugly and gives the Maryland seats a run for their money. Papas would probably be forced to run for Governor in that case. No shot he’d be able to hold onto a seat that red.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,689


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: July 10, 2021, 11:14:28 AM »



Honestly I believe this similar to 2010 Indiana. Probably a reverse of whatever Montana draws.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,133
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: July 10, 2021, 11:28:12 AM »

This is what I came up with:
https://davesredistricting.org/join/e56933aa-96f3-486c-9c3d-78bff76dfad2

Cleans up some county splits that I think are unnecessary, but it's otherwise quite similar to the current map. NH-01 now includes all of Rockingham, Strafford, Belknap and Carroll plus Manchester and a couple towns in Merrimack to balance population. NH-02 includes Hillsborough (except Manchester), most of Merrimack and all of Cheshire, Sullivan, Grafton and Coos.

NH-01 would be perennially competitive, and NH-02 would lean Dem most of the time, but be within reach for Republicans in a good year.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,722
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: July 10, 2021, 12:13:06 PM »

This is what I came up with:
https://davesredistricting.org/join/e56933aa-96f3-486c-9c3d-78bff76dfad2

Cleans up some county splits that I think are unnecessary, but it's otherwise quite similar to the current map. NH-01 now includes all of Rockingham, Strafford, Belknap and Carroll plus Manchester and a couple towns in Merrimack to balance population. NH-02 includes Hillsborough (except Manchester), most of Merrimack and all of Cheshire, Sullivan, Grafton and Coos.

NH-01 would be perennially competitive, and NH-02 would lean Dem most of the time, but be within reach for Republicans in a good year.

I honestly could see this map being passed, I think it's probably the best the NHGOP can expect or close to it without going crazy.

NH-1 would be competitive, NH-2 is probably out of reach for them in all but a mega wave year, which they really seem to be fine with.

Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,269
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: September 02, 2021, 06:10:04 AM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/2efb25f1-80eb-4b42-a73d-4a10dfe0e3a0
State Senate map
Logged
AustralianSwingVoter
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,093
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: September 09, 2021, 09:59:21 PM »

Given the Rs won a trifecta, I had a go at updating their State Senate gerrymander. There's 8 Dem packs and 2 more seats which should lean Dem. Trump won 13 districts in 2020 and 15 in 2016. The tipping point seat for an R majority is around 5 points right of the state, so the majority should only be threatened in very blue years like 2018.

https://davesredistricting.org/join/1d66f9ff-db27-4654-bbf8-d752e02edb3b

Logged
Devils30
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,101
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: September 09, 2021, 10:34:42 PM »

Part of the GOP's biggest issue is the eastern part of the state is trending Dem the fastest.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,446
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: September 11, 2021, 08:36:03 PM »

Just quickly put this together: https://davesredistricting.org/join/2bda7a29-7313-4d0c-9c87-fda1bd032af6

Pretty solid 1-1 map, District 1 was Trump+5 in 2020 and Trump+9 in 2016, whichever of Pappas/Kuster runs here, probably won't have much of a chance.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.