MT Congressional Redistricting
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:13:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  MT Congressional Redistricting
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13
Poll
Question: Will Republicans safely hold 2 Montana seats?
#1
Yes - Leftier district will be at least Likely R
 
#2
No - Western district will be Lean R at worst for Dems
 
#3
Montana will not actually gain a second seat
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 115

Author Topic: MT Congressional Redistricting  (Read 22495 times)
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: April 27, 2021, 12:47:48 AM »
« edited: April 27, 2021, 12:52:39 AM by FL & OH Are Gone, Ya Dinguses »

(The GOP/white district was Trump +36 & Gianforte +9 in 2016, Rosendale +11 in 2018 & Trump +33 in 2020)



Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: April 27, 2021, 03:05:54 AM »
« Edited: April 27, 2021, 03:11:12 AM by Southern Delegate Punxsutawney Phil »

Interesting factoid: If MT-01 and MT-02 were ressurected, with the same lines as they did in the 1980s, the western district would have almost 200,000 more people than the eastern one.
https://davesredistricting.org/join/0d23d928-a398-4074-9f71-18ad3b7098ba

1970s would have even larger population disparity: 220,000
https://davesredistricting.org/join/04ef7c1e-cdf8-426e-8d7f-0c6c24093730
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: April 27, 2021, 05:43:09 PM »

lmfao
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: April 27, 2021, 06:13:36 PM »

(The GOP/white district was Trump +36 & Gianforte +9 in 2016, Rosendale +11 in 2018 & Trump +33 in 2020)





This would be a gross D gerrymander which even this "independent" commission almost certainly wouldn’t go for. Splitting Yellowstone County and shoving Billings into MT-1 while not even touching NW Montana is a dead giveaway.

It’s a fun exercise, but you can just draw a more "compact" seat that would go D in a D-leaning or neutral year without splitting Yellowstone County.

Anyway, the only interesting question here is whether Gallatin will be split or Helena will be in the eastern district.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,738


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: April 27, 2021, 06:24:32 PM »



Here is a Dem gerrymander.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: April 27, 2021, 06:43:52 PM »

lmfao


The MT GOP is claiming the dems made it
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: April 27, 2021, 07:01:19 PM »

(The GOP/white district was Trump +36 & Gianforte +9 in 2016, Rosendale +11 in 2018 & Trump +33 in 2020)





This would be a gross D gerrymander which even this "independent" commission almost certainly wouldn’t go for. Splitting Yellowstone County and shoving Billings into MT-1 while not even touching NW Montana is a dead giveaway.

It’s a fun exercise, but you can just draw a more "compact" seat that would go D in a D-leaning or neutral year without splitting Yellowstone County.

Anyway, the only interesting question here is whether Gallatin will be split or Helena will be in the eastern district.

Not sure I really get the controversy over splitting a state's largest county (even in MT). Eighty percent of Yellowstone voters are contained within one district (including virtually all of Billings proper), and the remainder of the county is a land mass twice the size of Rhode Island with 40,000 people living in it.

I would have expected you to be much more upset about Helena!
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: April 27, 2021, 07:04:15 PM »

BTW the commission is in the state constitution, so it would take a 2/3rds majority of both chambers to put an amendment on the ballot to modify/overrule it.  Republicans do not have 2/3rds in the state senate, so they are stuck with what the commission produces. 
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: April 27, 2021, 07:31:20 PM »

Since my original map went for a combo of population density & Democratic performance, here's another that just focuses on starting in Glorious NW Montana and including the densest counties possible while minimizing square mileage for CD1 as a whole.

(Adding Gallatin would require splitting it anyway + making CD1 a bit larger in square mileage)



Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: April 27, 2021, 07:56:42 PM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: April 27, 2021, 10:44:54 PM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.


Not bad: Trump +2.51 in 2020 (49.92-47.41).
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,446


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: April 27, 2021, 10:50:32 PM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.


I wholeheartedly endorse this map.

The only potential points of contention I can think of associated with this map are: (1) it splits the Flathead Reservation (part of it is in Missoula County, which is separate from the other parts in Flathead, Lake, and Sanders counties) and (2) it separates Mineral and Missoula counties, which are connected with each other by the same major interstate highway (90).
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,652
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: April 28, 2021, 08:38:31 AM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.


Not bad: Trump +2.51 in 2020 (49.92-47.41).

Trying to find 2016 numbers.  Was it Trump+7 2016?  If so, this would likely be a Dem leaning district presidentially by 2028.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: April 28, 2021, 08:06:31 PM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.


Not bad: Trump +2.51 in 2020 (49.92-47.41).

Trying to find 2016 numbers.  Was it Trump+7 2016?  If so, this would likely be a Dem leaning district presidentially by 2028.

According to the DRA link via OP, it was Trump +7.2 in 2016 (49.4-42.2).
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,446


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: April 29, 2021, 12:18:11 AM »

This seems like the cleanest map, no county splits and almost all the Native American population is in MT-2 (for whatever that's worth).






https://davesredistricting.org/join/6ee8c186-bb8e-4fe5-9aba-21e276830b1b

Exluding the flathead area it's even geographically consistent,  keeping the Long Mountain to Custer NF areas with the mountainous west.

This isn't made to maximize Dem votes in the western district either.


Not bad: Trump +2.51 in 2020 (49.92-47.41).

Here are some downballot results from 2020 under this configuration:

Race District 1 District 2
Senate D+3.8 R+25.52
House D+0.7 R+27.88
Governor D+0.84 R+29.23
Secretary of State R+5.78 R+34.04
Attorney General R+2.66 R+33.02
State Auditor R+2.2 R+31.22
State Superintendent of Public Instruction D+4.34 R+22.7

It would appear that Lewis and Clark County would serve as the "bellwether" for District 1 under this configuration.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,101
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: April 30, 2021, 02:57:02 AM »

lmfao

I presume you can't travel from each end of the blue district without travelling through the green one or Idaho? I'm looking particularly at Ravalli County.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: April 30, 2021, 04:59:39 AM »

Has anyone made that in DRA?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: April 30, 2021, 08:52:21 PM »

As of now, yes.
https://davesredistricting.org/join/9cdaaa2e-83ce-4fde-b527-7058d5745dc5
This map was brought to you by the precinct splitting tool.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: May 01, 2021, 02:43:57 AM »

Has anyone noticed it is possible, under 2019 figures, to avoid having any county splits by having all of Western Montana sans Gallatin form the 1st and the rest of the state form the 2nd?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: May 03, 2021, 10:56:39 AM »
« Edited: May 05, 2021, 03:23:22 PM by lfromnj »



If anyone is wondering why the Billings to Kalispell district is bad from a "good government" point of view.

Obviously not every district can be "ideal" or anything but in a 2 district state its fairly simple to decide. In a larger state I can definitely see sacrifices being made to protect the rest of the map such as how Wisconsin can't really keep the Fox River valley together despite it being a very nice COI that fits because it would really screw up the rest of the map big time.
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,247
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: May 03, 2021, 11:02:55 AM »



If anyone is wondering why the Billings to Kalispell district is bad from a "good government" point of view.
Given how the commission was rigged AZ style, that's probably what we are going to get
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: May 03, 2021, 11:07:12 AM »



If anyone is wondering why the Billings to Kalispell district is bad from a "good government" point of view.
Given how the commission was rigged AZ style, that's probably what we are going to get

Not denying that, just explaining to atlas why its probably a bad map.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: May 03, 2021, 12:06:26 PM »



If anyone is wondering why the Billings to Kalispell district is bad from a "good government" point of view.
Given how the commission was rigged AZ style, that's probably what we are going to get

Not denying that, just explaining to atlas why its probably a bad map.

You have to break up the mountains at some point anyway, there's too much population in the west.   Plus "following the mountains" as they're suggesting breaks up Native reservations.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,367


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: May 03, 2021, 12:17:28 PM »
« Edited: May 03, 2021, 10:02:19 PM by lfromnj »



If anyone is wondering why the Billings to Kalispell district is bad from a "good government" point of view.
Given how the commission was rigged AZ style, that's probably what we are going to get

Not denying that, just explaining to atlas why its probably a bad map.

You have to break up the mountains at some point anyway, there's too much population in the west.   Plus "following the mountains" as they're suggesting breaks up Native reservations.

No it doesn't really break up any reservations. Flathead does not include the Blackfeet native reservation. And yes you do have to break up the mountains but clearly there are more relatively flatter areas near Bozeman/Helena. Kalispell/Whitehead is in the core of the mountain region.There are areas in Flathead which have like 12% native bordering the reservation but its like 42 Native Americans who live like a whole hour away.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,135
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: May 03, 2021, 04:31:08 PM »

Yeah any fair map worth its salt has to have Kalispell in the Western district, it's a bad map otherwise.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 11 queries.