Justice department sues Yale for illegal discrimination based on race

[KaiserDave]

 The 1964 Civil Rights Act was and is still a huge mistake and there is no reason to continue that mistake.

Jaichind at job interview in 1963 .

 Interviewer -- "So solly, Chinaman! We don't hire your type here!"

Jaichind -- "Hrumph. This will all be worth it when Goldwater is elected and cuts capital gains taxes."

The logical conclusion of such logic is that everyone should have a mind reader attached to their brain so when they walk past a store A and enter store B to buy groceries the mind reader should ascertain if such a decision was based on the race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age etc etc of the store owner of A and report such findings to the government

What are frankly juvenile assessment of racial discrimination. Until the 1964 CRA pass, there were stores throughout the South and the country that said whites only.

And where the government mandates them to be White only I would oppose such government action but where they make that choice as part of a business strategy I feel they should be free to do so.  A private institution should have the freedom of association and make its own decisions on who or what they want to make economic transitions with.  The only part of 1964 Civil Rights Act which I would back is that it would make illegal state and local government action to mandate racial segregation for private institutions.    

" segregation as a business strategy". Neat.

Let me remind you, gentle readers, that this vileness comes from the same poster who, quite seriously, acknowledged he would invest in a child prostitution brothel so long as it was sufficiently profitable for him.

Link I beg you

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=246536.msg5291145#msg5291145

All of Jaichind’s comments there were horrid. Horrid.

[lfromnj]

 The 1964 Civil Rights Act was and is still a huge mistake and there is no reason to continue that mistake.

Jaichind at job interview in 1963 .

 Interviewer -- "So solly, Chinaman! We don't hire your type here!"

Jaichind -- "Hrumph. This will all be worth it when Goldwater is elected and cuts capital gains taxes."

The logical conclusion of such logic is that everyone should have a mind reader attached to their brain so when they walk past a store A and enter store B to buy groceries the mind reader should ascertain if such a decision was based on the race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age etc etc of the store owner of A and report such findings to the government

What are frankly juvenile assessment of racial discrimination. Until the 1964 CRA pass, there were stores throughout the South and the country that said whites only.

And where the government mandates them to be White only I would oppose such government action but where they make that choice as part of a business strategy I feel they should be free to do so.  A private institution should have the freedom of association and make its own decisions on who or what they want to make economic transitions with.  The only part of 1964 Civil Rights Act which I would back is that it would make illegal state and local government action to mandate racial segregation for private institutions.    

" segregation as a business strategy". Neat.

Let me remind you, gentle readers, that this vileness comes from the same poster who, quite seriously, acknowledged he would invest in a child prostitution brothel so long as it was sufficiently profitable for him.

Link I beg you

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=246536.msg5291145#msg5291145

All of Jaichind’s comments there were horrid. Horrid.

Words fail me as to what an HP Jaichind is. One gets the impression he loves money so much he'd open an overseas teen brothel if it was highly profitable and he wouldn't get sued or lose social status over it.

Not kidding.

Thank you for your feedback.  I guess I have several response to this

1) Yes, I would absolutely be willing to invest in the adult entertainment industry if I thought the ROI was better than other industries.  In fact several years ago I looked into a fund which explicitly invested in brothel in Australia.  I did not put any time looking into it further on the basic reasoning that the demand for brothel services must be long term trend decline  the hook up cultural we live in while the liberalization of third world economies would increase supply.  That fund did not go anywhere folded anyway.  In fact I think I read a few economic papers after that which pretty much said the same thing.  The relative drop in the relative compensation of an escort from a hundred years ago is actually quite dramatic.  A friend of my at work did have a chance two decades ago to get into internet porn distribution industry but choose not to and has kicked himself ever since as he missed out on a bundle of money.  Now that was an investment worth getting into a couple of decades ago and perhaps even now.
 
2) The best I would do is to invest in such an enterprise as a passive investor and not try to run it.  While I am fairly successful as a middle/upper management type I would actually be a pretty horrible entrepreneur as I am pretty poor at thinking outside the box.  So even if I would try to make money out of this industry I would not "open" any brothel or related entities but invest in or loan money said  enterprise.

He probably missed the words teen.

[KaiserDave]

 The 1964 Civil Rights Act was and is still a huge mistake and there is no reason to continue that mistake.

Jaichind at job interview in 1963 .

 Interviewer -- "So solly, Chinaman! We don't hire your type here!"

Jaichind -- "Hrumph. This will all be worth it when Goldwater is elected and cuts capital gains taxes."

The logical conclusion of such logic is that everyone should have a mind reader attached to their brain so when they walk past a store A and enter store B to buy groceries the mind reader should ascertain if such a decision was based on the race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age etc etc of the store owner of A and report such findings to the government

What are frankly juvenile assessment of racial discrimination. Until the 1964 CRA pass, there were stores throughout the South and the country that said whites only.

And where the government mandates them to be White only I would oppose such government action but where they make that choice as part of a business strategy I feel they should be free to do so.  A private institution should have the freedom of association and make its own decisions on who or what they want to make economic transitions with.  The only part of 1964 Civil Rights Act which I would back is that it would make illegal state and local government action to mandate racial segregation for private institutions.    

" segregation as a business strategy". Neat.

Let me remind you, gentle readers, that this vileness comes from the same poster who, quite seriously, acknowledged he would invest in a child prostitution brothel so long as it was sufficiently profitable for him.

Link I beg you

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=246536.msg5291145#msg5291145

All of Jaichind’s comments there were horrid. Horrid.

Words fail me as to what an HP Jaichind is. One gets the impression he loves money so much he'd open an overseas teen brothel if it was highly profitable and he wouldn't get sued or lose social status over it.

Not kidding.

Thank you for your feedback.  I guess I have several response to this

1) Yes, I would absolutely be willing to invest in the adult entertainment industry if I thought the ROI was better than other industries.  In fact several years ago I looked into a fund which explicitly invested in brothel in Australia.  I did not put any time looking into it further on the basic reasoning that the demand for brothel services must be long term trend decline  the hook up cultural we live in while the liberalization of third world economies would increase supply.  That fund did not go anywhere folded anyway.  In fact I think I read a few economic papers after that which pretty much said the same thing.  The relative drop in the relative compensation of an escort from a hundred years ago is actually quite dramatic.  A friend of my at work did have a chance two decades ago to get into internet porn distribution industry but choose not to and has kicked himself ever since as he missed out on a bundle of money.  Now that was an investment worth getting into a couple of decades ago and perhaps even now.
 
2) The best I would do is to invest in such an enterprise as a passive investor and not try to run it.  While I am fairly successful as a middle/upper management type I would actually be a pretty horrible entrepreneur as I am pretty poor at thinking outside the box.  So even if I would try to make money out of this industry I would not "open" any brothel or related entities but invest in or loan money said  enterprise.

He probably missed the words teen.

Even so there is a completely absence of any moral compass beyond profit motive. I don't have much reason to believe, based on his comments here or there that his opinion would be any different given that he truly believes that "A private institution should have the freedom of association and make its own decisions on who or what they want to make economic transitions with."

[ملكة كرينجيتوك]

Hasn't affirmative action already been gutted to be a 'factor of a factor', and only in the context of promoting overall diversity among the student body (which is a worthy goal, Ivy League alumni shouldn't be disproportionately white)? So basically what this would be is where the applications are virtually equal, and race provides the very slight tilt to one applicant over another.

Pretty much, although it probably varies from school to school. Race-based affirmative action basically helps white applicants at the expense of Asian applicants in practice.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

The fact that it is so difficult for Asian Americans to get into top colleges is a bit iffy, but it is not African-Americans who are being admitted at their expense. It is white kids whose parents are donors or who are legacy. If such practices occurred at the top British universities there would be widespread outrage. This is the negative side of having a large number of private universities; in the UK virtually all are public.

I mean, from what I understand no countries in Europe really have anything like affirmative action right? (And thankfully)

Finland has affirmative action for Swedish speakers iirc; there are also a fair amount of pro-women AA schemes, especially in the Nordic countries.

[StateBoiler]

More important is what the Biden admin might do.

Dismiss.

[Badger]

 The 1964 Civil Rights Act was and is still a huge mistake and there is no reason to continue that mistake.

Jaichind at job interview in 1963 .

 Interviewer -- "So solly, Chinaman! We don't hire your type here!"

Jaichind -- "Hrumph. This will all be worth it when Goldwater is elected and cuts capital gains taxes."

The logical conclusion of such logic is that everyone should have a mind reader attached to their brain so when they walk past a store A and enter store B to buy groceries the mind reader should ascertain if such a decision was based on the race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age etc etc of the store owner of A and report such findings to the government

What are frankly juvenile assessment of racial discrimination. Until the 1964 CRA pass, there were stores throughout the South and the country that said whites only.

And where the government mandates them to be White only I would oppose such government action but where they make that choice as part of a business strategy I feel they should be free to do so.  A private institution should have the freedom of association and make its own decisions on who or what they want to make economic transitions with.  The only part of 1964 Civil Rights Act which I would back is that it would make illegal state and local government action to mandate racial segregation for private institutions.    

" segregation as a business strategy". Neat.

Let me remind you, gentle readers, that this vileness comes from the same poster who, quite seriously, acknowledged he would invest in a child prostitution brothel so long as it was sufficiently profitable for him.

Link I beg you

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=246536.msg5291145#msg5291145

All of Jaichind’s comments there were horrid. Horrid.

Words fail me as to what an HP Jaichind is. One gets the impression he loves money so much he'd open an overseas teen brothel if it was highly profitable and he wouldn't get sued or lose social status over it.

Not kidding.

Thank you for your feedback.  I guess I have several response to this

1) Yes, I would absolutely be willing to invest in the adult entertainment industry if I thought the ROI was better than other industries.  In fact several years ago I looked into a fund which explicitly invested in brothel in Australia.  I did not put any time looking into it further on the basic reasoning that the demand for brothel services must be long term trend decline  the hook up cultural we live in while the liberalization of third world economies would increase supply.  That fund did not go anywhere folded anyway.  In fact I think I read a few economic papers after that which pretty much said the same thing.  The relative drop in the relative compensation of an escort from a hundred years ago is actually quite dramatic.  A friend of my at work did have a chance two decades ago to get into internet porn distribution industry but choose not to and has kicked himself ever since as he missed out on a bundle of money.  Now that was an investment worth getting into a couple of decades ago and perhaps even now.
 
2) The best I would do is to invest in such an enterprise as a passive investor and not try to run it.  While I am fairly successful as a middle/upper management type I would actually be a pretty horrible entrepreneur as I am pretty poor at thinking outside the box.  So even if I would try to make money out of this industry I would not "open" any brothel or related entities but invest in or loan money said  enterprise.

He probably missed the words teen.

Not entirely impossible, but a very generous bordering on skepticism inducing response. If one does a keyword search of his name and brothel as I just dI'd, the issue has been brought up repeatedly since then, and not just by me but even reasonable non flaming liberals like cathcon, and he is never bother to deny it. This includes multiple threads where he is the subject such as opinion of j a i c h i n d, and threads were he has posted such as the 1.5 trillion-dollar tax cut megathread.

Now, it is admittedly possible that he simply missed all the several other threads - - j a i c h i n d does not strike me as the type to go on the Forum Community page often, and even I have missed opinion of me threads until they were Pages deep. Also that tax cut thread was enormous, and it's possible he simply missed my and other posters pointing this out after his proceeding posts and instead skipped ahead some pages when he returned to the thread. However, I'm saying is there's been a lot of opportunities for him to catch the whole Teen part and correct the record, and somehow they've all been missed.

Moreover, even if one gives him that benefit of the doubt, consider that he apparently fully noted the term overseas, and commented with cold analysis how " the liberalization of third world markets would increase Supply". At absolute best this is an ice water in his veins level endorsement of exploiting poverty-stricken women in the Third World - - even if adults - - it makes him a few bucks more Roi then some other investment.

 As pointed out in many of these threads, this is entirely, 110% consistent with his willingness to see the rest of the world more or less go to hell so long as he and his family and their tight circle of friends - - who he personally described as having net values in the 5 to 20 million dollar range - - all do well.

My point is even if you are completely correct, it's still reprehensible, and accordingly consistent with his continually stated odious beliefs