Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 09:08:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 ... 155
Author Topic: Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)  (Read 154329 times)
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,815
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1900 on: February 04, 2020, 09:40:41 AM »

Why would Warren lose so much (and Biden gain so much) in translating the final vote into SDEs?
The number of caucus participants varies quite a bit across the state. Caucus turnout is particularly high at college campuses, and urban areas, lower in rural areas.

State delegates are awarded to counties based on the Democratic vote for president in 2016, and governor in 2018.

In 2016, caucus turnout was 170K, while Clinton received 650K votes. So roughly 26% of Democratic voters caucused (ignoring for effects of Democratic caucus goers not voting for Clinton).

But in Johnson County (Iowa City/UI) and Story County (Ames/ISU) the ratio was around 40%. It was elevated in more urban counties, and depressed in rural counties (more around 20%).

So imagine two precincts with 1000 Democratic votes in 2016/2018. They would each elect the same number of state delegates (indirectly, which is what SDE are).

One has 30% turnout (300) and the other 20% turnout (200).

Now imagine Warren gets 20% of the vote in Precinct A (60 votes) and 15% of the vote in Precinct B (30 votes). Overall she has 90/500 = 18%.

Now imagine Biden gets 15% of the vote in Precinct A (45 votes) and 20% of the votes in Precinct B (40 votes). Overall she has 85/500 = 17%.

But they would get the same number of delegates.

There could also be selection biases. I'm not saying the Sanders campaign was cherry-picking the data, but they were able to get results from only about 2/5 of precincts. Perhaps they were getting reports from precinct captains where Sanders did well. If your precinct gave him 35% wouldn't you want the Sanders campaign to know? If Sanders was not viable in your precinct, you would be more reluctant to report the result. You might have gone home. If Sanders was not viable, it would likely mean that Warren was.
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,992
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1901 on: February 04, 2020, 09:40:54 AM »

If Biden really is 5th, would this be the biggest flop for any national frontrunner? Especially considering he held his national lead from the start, unlike Giuliani, who collapsed late in 2007 before any vote was cast.

Anyway, it appears to be a dumpster fire for him. I almost regret endorsing him. At least CA hasn't voted yet.
I think it's better to go towards a fresher face like Pete Buttigieg or Amy Klobuchar if you want to stop Sanders or Warren. I mean New Hampshire is going to be close as well and I doubt Biden is going to do there as well, as it's close to Sanders' homestate and Warren's homestate and Buttigieg is creating momentum. Klobuchar also has the momentum going. And eventually the results for IA will come in and they'll inevitably talk about it. I mean it doesn't look good for Biden.

And if Biden can't win in this crowded field, will his electability argument still stand out. If he can't win here in IA in a Democratic caucus, will he win a state like IA back in the general election. The answer is no. IA votes very similar as WI, so that means Wisconsin will be in danger too. It doesn't too look good for Biden.

I think someone new as Pete or Amy will fit you better, and in my belief, the newer generation fit the values of America better. I would be willing to coalesce around one of those two, while i'm not doing that for Joe Biden.
Logged
gottsu
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 822
Poland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1902 on: February 04, 2020, 09:41:26 AM »

If Biden really is 5th, would this be the biggest flop for any national frontrunner? Especially considering he held his national lead from the start, unlike Giuliani, who collapsed late in 2007 before any vote was cast.

Anyway, it appears to be a dumpster fire for him. I almost regret endorsing him. At least CA hasn't voted yet.

They once called Kamala Harris Democratic Marco Rubio, so now they will call Joe Biden Democratic Jeb Bush.

The biggest primary frontrunner flop to me still stays Gary Hart.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,739
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1903 on: February 04, 2020, 09:42:28 AM »

If Biden really is 5th, would this be the biggest flop for any national frontrunner? Especially considering he held his national lead from the start, unlike Giuliani, who collapsed late in 2007 before any vote was cast.

Anyway, it appears to be a dumpster fire for him. I almost regret endorsing him. At least CA hasn't voted yet.

It appears so.
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,992
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1904 on: February 04, 2020, 09:43:56 AM »

The fact that with more Democrats to choose from than even in 2008 and not without a declining population and more election coverage that turnout is lower than in 2008 is concerning as well for Democrats. This might meen that the state still has a strong Republican lean, and that few swing voters / independents and so caucused for their candidate. I don't think IA will flip in november guys.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,739
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1905 on: February 04, 2020, 09:44:28 AM »

Harris=Rubio
Beto=Walker
Biden=Bush
Warren=Kasich?
Logged
scutosaurus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,664
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1906 on: February 04, 2020, 09:45:08 AM »

Broke: DNC is rigging the primary against Bernie
Woke: DNC is rigging the primary against Yang
Bespoke: DNC is rigging the primary against Biden

The DNC is only rigging the primary against Bennet.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,779
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1907 on: February 04, 2020, 09:45:36 AM »

It always comes back to Hillary:

Tech firm started by Clinton campaign veterans is linked to Iowa caucus reporting debacle
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,250
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1908 on: February 04, 2020, 09:45:54 AM »

If Biden really is 5th, would this be the biggest flop for any national frontrunner? Especially considering he held his national lead from the start, unlike Giuliani, who collapsed late in 2007 before any vote was cast.

Anyway, it appears to be a dumpster fire for him. I almost regret endorsing him. At least CA hasn't voted yet.
I think it's better to go towards a fresher face like Pete Buttigieg or Amy Klobuchar if you want to stop Sanders or Warren. I mean New Hampshire is going to be close as well and I doubt Biden is going to do there as well, as it's close to Sanders' homestate and Warren's homestate and Buttigieg is creating momentum. Klobuchar also has the momentum going. And eventually the results for IA will come in and they'll inevitably talk about it. I mean it doesn't look good for Biden.

And if Biden can't win in this crowded field, will his electability argument still stand out. If he can't win here in IA in a Democratic caucus, will he win a state like IA back in the general election. The answer is no. IA votes very similar as WI, so that means Wisconsin will be in danger too. It doesn't too look good for Biden.

I think someone new as Pete or Amy will fit you better, and in my belief, the newer generation fit the values of America better. I would be willing to coalesce around one of those two, while i'm not doing that for Joe Biden.

I've always recognized Biden's flaws and the lack excitement for his campaign over the months. It appears that his support in polls is mostly soft.

Btw, I don't want to stop Warren. She's my 2nd choice with Butti. I have nothing against Sanders as well. Tbh, I most want to beat Trump. If Sanders is the nominee, I will do everything to get him elected. If Bloomberg is nominated, fine. I will do everything to get him elected prez. Anyone who beats Trump and makes modest improvements in peoples lives is a big step forward.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,906
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1909 on: February 04, 2020, 09:46:14 AM »

Woof... great start guys lol. Was out cold and missed the festivities unfortunately, but this is just an amazing start for the dems...

Front runner Biden 5th... hahahahahahaha!!!!

This is certainly making the Clinton '08 supporter in me feel a bit better about her 3rd place finish there.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,870
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1910 on: February 04, 2020, 09:47:29 AM »

If Biden really is 5th, would this be the biggest flop for any national frontrunner? Especially considering he held his national lead from the start, unlike Giuliani, who collapsed late in 2007 before any vote was cast.

Anyway, it appears to be a dumpster fire for him. I almost regret endorsing him. At least CA hasn't voted yet.

Only other example I can think of is Dean 2004
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1911 on: February 04, 2020, 09:47:49 AM »

Harris=Rubio
Beto=Walker
Biden=Bush
Warren=Kasich?
Warren=Cruz.

Both are Southerners who are ideologically purist and rigid and whose voices sound like nails on a chalkboard.
Logged
American2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,518
Côte d'Ivoire


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1912 on: February 04, 2020, 09:48:06 AM »

Harris=Rubio
Beto=Walker
Biden=Bush
Warren=Kasich?
?=Trump
?=Ted Cruz
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,739
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1913 on: February 04, 2020, 09:48:25 AM »

Harris=Rubio
Beto=Walker
Biden=Bush
Warren=Kasich?
Warren=Cruz.

Both are Southerners who are ideologically purist and rigid and whose voices sound like nails on a chalkboard.


Um
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,779
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1914 on: February 04, 2020, 09:48:34 AM »

When this is all over, Iowa should be relegated to a backwater in future election cycles.  Never again should it have the same place of prominence it has enjoyed for decades.  
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1915 on: February 04, 2020, 09:50:12 AM »

DEMOCRATS IN DISARRAY
Logged
gottsu
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 822
Poland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1916 on: February 04, 2020, 09:50:35 AM »

When this is all over, Iowa should be relegated to a backwater in future election cycles.  Never again should it have the same place of prominence it has enjoyed for decades.  

Speaking of law, you can do someting with Iowa caucus?
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,301
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1917 on: February 04, 2020, 09:50:54 AM »


'Kay.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,739
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1918 on: February 04, 2020, 09:51:48 AM »


Atlas in disarray.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,814
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1919 on: February 04, 2020, 09:53:24 AM »

I like the suggestion to just scrap these caucuses completely and schedule an Iowa Democratic primary on June 2, the last major day of primary season. 

We have untainted results coming in shortly. The vote has already been cast. It would be a travesty for it not to count over a handful of irregularities on second round balloting. Let the results be posted and the people of Iowa have their unique say. We are talking uncertainty over a couple delegates out of thousands. Otherwise, you are just moving 20+ delegates to the presumed nominee.

It's not as if primaries are without irregularities. They are just more discreet.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,814
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1920 on: February 04, 2020, 09:53:56 AM »


Bloomberg = Trump
Klobuchar = Kasich
Warren = Cruz
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,739
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1921 on: February 04, 2020, 09:55:18 AM »

I can't even imagine the amount of chaos at the IDP HQ yesterday night especially. Now too.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,117


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1922 on: February 04, 2020, 09:55:39 AM »

Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1923 on: February 04, 2020, 09:56:53 AM »

Not a great way for the Dems to start off.  The GOP in 2012 started off similarly, and look where they ended up that year.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,779
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1924 on: February 04, 2020, 09:59:55 AM »

When this is all over, Iowa should be relegated to a backwater in future election cycles.  Never again should it have the same place of prominence it has enjoyed for decades.  

Speaking of law, you can do someting with Iowa caucus?

We cut down on the number of superdelegates, and greatly reduced the number of caucuses last time, didn't we?  We can put Iowa and New Hampshire at the back of the line beginning with the 2024 election cycle. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 [77] 78 79 80 81 82 ... 155  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 10 queries.