What if 1948 was thrown to the house due Thurmond winning more states (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:09:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  What if 1948 was thrown to the house due Thurmond winning more states (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if 1948 was thrown to the house due Thurmond winning more states  (Read 1517 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: April 23, 2020, 11:23:42 PM »

Thurmond has his people vote for Truman after forcing him to drop or at least slow-walk civil rights.  The CRA/VRA then happens under a Republican president and congress in the late 1950's.

Why? The Republicans were in charge in the 1950s as it was, and did pass the rather limited and ineffective Civil Rights Act of 1957 (which Thurmond infamously filibustered), but didn't go any farther than that. I don't know if Thurmond forcing Truman to back off on Civil Rights (which I'm not convinced he would do) would change much in the long run. No matter how much the Dixiecrats kicked and screamed and even delayed it, the party was moving forward on Civil Rights one way or another. If Kennedy still wins in 1960, nothing much changes probably.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.