2004: John Edwards the Democratic nominee.

[538Electoral]

What would the map have looked like?

[Sir Mohamed]

Same as IRL with NH and WI going to W (Kerry just barely won WI, as did Gore in 2000). Edwards would have done poorly across the board.

✓ President George W. Bush (R-TX)/Vice President Richard Cheney (R-WY): 300 EVs.; 51.0%
Senator John Edwards (D-NC)/Governor Howard Dean (D-VT): 238 EVs.; 47.1%

[538Electoral]

Same as IRL with NH and WI going to W (Kerry just barely won WI, as did Gore in 2000). Edwards would have done poorly across the board.

✓ President George W. Bush (R-TX)/Vice President Richard Cheney (R-WY): 300 EVs.; 51.0%
Senator John Edwards (D-NC)/Governor Howard Dean (D-VT): 238 EVs.; 47.1%

And that's the same map I would've thought.

[UWS]

Same as IRL with NH and WI going to W (Kerry just barely won WI, as did Gore in 2000). Edwards would have done poorly across the board.

✓ President George W. Bush (R-TX)/Vice President Richard Cheney (R-WY): 300 EVs.; 51.0%
Senator John Edwards (D-NC)/Governor Howard Dean (D-VT): 238 EVs.; 47.1%

And that's the same map I would've thought.

This, though I would flip Pennsylvania to Bush.