2020 Redistricting in Pennsylvania
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 04:15:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Redistricting in Pennsylvania
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 37
Author Topic: 2020 Redistricting in Pennsylvania  (Read 42304 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #550 on: December 14, 2021, 12:56:28 PM »
« edited: December 14, 2021, 01:16:06 PM by lfromnj »



Cleaned up  R map which also makes PA06 more red. Not sure what the point of these antics are when all this does is antagonize Dems who might be interested in a compromise.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,731


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #551 on: December 14, 2021, 01:16:47 PM »
« Edited: December 14, 2021, 01:22:02 PM by ProgressiveModerate »

Wish there was a more Harrisburg centered district but not a bad map.

That PA-17 seems to intentionally take in reddest rural areas possible which seem kind of disconnected
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #552 on: December 14, 2021, 01:24:06 PM »
« Edited: December 14, 2021, 01:43:59 PM by lfromnj »

Wish there was a more Harrisburg centered district but not a bad map.

It's fairly easy to make a pretty Safe R Harrisburg district which would just mostly be Cumberland + Dauphin + Lebanon + 50k random pop. The issue however is Lancaster County is the base of the PA GOP and the house redistricting chair is from York. SCPA is basically 2 districts worth of pop so even without partisan implications Harrisburg would be the one to get chopped by any GOP map especially considering Perry is from York and Smucker is from Lancaster.

The most gerrymandered part is keeping the Lackawanna/Lehigh configuration where they make PA07 and PA08 both more red by having PA08 taking in random rurals before taking in the rest of the Wilkes Barres area.

Also they made PA06 more R but also more compact as I said earlier where even though it seemed that PA06 was a R gerrymander in Holton's map it was relatively D friendly.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #553 on: December 14, 2021, 03:08:19 PM »

Wish there was a more Harrisburg centered district but not a bad map.

It's fairly easy to make a pretty Safe R Harrisburg district which would just mostly be Cumberland + Dauphin + Lebanon + 50k random pop. The issue however is Lancaster County is the base of the PA GOP and the house redistricting chair is from York. SCPA is basically 2 districts worth of pop so even without partisan implications Harrisburg would be the one to get chopped by any GOP map especially considering Perry is from York and Smucker is from Lancaster.

The most gerrymandered part is keeping the Lackawanna/Lehigh configuration where they make PA07 and PA08 both more red by having PA08 taking in random rurals before taking in the rest of the Wilkes Barres area.

Also they made PA06 more R but also more compact as I said earlier where even though it seemed that PA06 was a R gerrymander in Holton's map it was relatively D friendly.
A thought: why couldn't  Harrisburg be paired with State College in a fair-fight district, while Smucker and Perry both get the sort of districts they want?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #554 on: December 14, 2021, 03:12:05 PM »
« Edited: December 14, 2021, 03:19:10 PM by lfromnj »

Wish there was a more Harrisburg centered district but not a bad map.

It's fairly easy to make a pretty Safe R Harrisburg district which would just mostly be Cumberland + Dauphin + Lebanon + 50k random pop. The issue however is Lancaster County is the base of the PA GOP and the house redistricting chair is from York. SCPA is basically 2 districts worth of pop so even without partisan implications Harrisburg would be the one to get chopped by any GOP map especially considering Perry is from York and Smucker is from Lancaster.

The most gerrymandered part is keeping the Lackawanna/Lehigh configuration where they make PA07 and PA08 both more red by having PA08 taking in random rurals before taking in the rest of the Wilkes Barres area.

Also they made PA06 more R but also more compact as I said earlier where even though it seemed that PA06 was a R gerrymander in Holton's map it was relatively D friendly.
A thought: why couldn't  Harrisburg be paired with State College in a fair-fight district, while Smucker and Perry both get the sort of districts they want?

I was working on that but anyway a compromise map just nukes it or at least keeps it Trump +10 as its the last thing Dems will want. They only have 3 state reps in the entirety of the state college, Harrisburg and York area. No state senators either in the area so little push for it.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #555 on: December 14, 2021, 03:20:01 PM »

Wish there was a more Harrisburg centered district but not a bad map.

It's fairly easy to make a pretty Safe R Harrisburg district which would just mostly be Cumberland + Dauphin + Lebanon + 50k random pop. The issue however is Lancaster County is the base of the PA GOP and the house redistricting chair is from York. SCPA is basically 2 districts worth of pop so even without partisan implications Harrisburg would be the one to get chopped by any GOP map especially considering Perry is from York and Smucker is from Lancaster.

The most gerrymandered part is keeping the Lackawanna/Lehigh configuration where they make PA07 and PA08 both more red by having PA08 taking in random rurals before taking in the rest of the Wilkes Barres area.

Also they made PA06 more R but also more compact as I said earlier where even though it seemed that PA06 was a R gerrymander in Holton's map it was relatively D friendly.
A thought: why couldn't  Harrisburg be paired with State College in a fair-fight district, while Smucker and Perry both get the sort of districts they want?

I was working on that but anyway compromise map just nukes it or atleast keeps it Trump +10 as its the last thing Dems will want. They only have 3 state reps in the entirety of the state college, Harrisburg and York area. No state senators either so little push for it.
Ah, that makes sense.
Ds pushing for a fair-fight Dauphin-to-Penn State CD would likely come at the expense of one of their SEPA incumbents too, come to think about it. Give-and-take is the essence of a bipartisan compromise map.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #556 on: December 14, 2021, 04:13:29 PM »
« Edited: December 14, 2021, 04:17:00 PM by Southern Delegate Punxsutawney Phil »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c011e3b9-9b53-4bc8-9846-8c493d29d378
(An effort at a) bipartisan compromise map that splits no townships. Definitely at least a bit D friendly (especially to Dem incumbents), but the Lehigh CD, the median district, is more R-friendly than its current iteration, in fact, perfectly mirroring the state's partisanship with 2020 numbers, and also has a R+ PVI on 2016/2020 numbers.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,343
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #557 on: December 14, 2021, 04:49:53 PM »



Cleaned up  R map which also makes PA06 more red. Not sure what the point of these antics are when all this does is antagonize Dems who might be interested in a compromise.

Why should we compromise when we control the State Supreme Court?
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,986
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #558 on: December 14, 2021, 08:47:19 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c011e3b9-9b53-4bc8-9846-8c493d29d378
(An effort at a) bipartisan compromise map that splits no townships. Definitely at least a bit D friendly (especially to Dem incumbents), but the Lehigh CD, the median district, is more R-friendly than its current iteration, in fact, perfectly mirroring the state's partisanship with 2020 numbers, and also has a R+ PVI on 2016/2020 numbers.

Do Republicans have a shot at either of the Allegheny County districts in 2022 with this map?
Logged
compucomp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,578


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #559 on: December 14, 2021, 09:25:07 PM »


Cleaned up  R map which also makes PA06 more red. Not sure what the point of these antics are when all this does is antagonize Dems who might be interested in a compromise.

Why should we compromise when we control the State Supreme Court?

Because they'll probably draw a map that resembles the current map (that they drew) with a red seat in the middle cut out but with PA-7, PA-8, and PA-17 taking in more red territory. So a mostly fair map that has some competitive districts. It could be better to lock in an incumbent protection gerrymander type map.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #560 on: December 14, 2021, 09:31:09 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/c011e3b9-9b53-4bc8-9846-8c493d29d378
(An effort at a) bipartisan compromise map that splits no townships. Definitely at least a bit D friendly (especially to Dem incumbents), but the Lehigh CD, the median district, is more R-friendly than its current iteration, in fact, perfectly mirroring the state's partisanship with 2020 numbers, and also has a R+ PVI on 2016/2020 numbers.

Do Republicans have a shot at either of the Allegheny County districts in 2022 with this map?
Biden won them both by more than a dozen points.
Logged
Boss_Rahm
Rookie
**
Posts: 206


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #561 on: December 14, 2021, 11:48:29 PM »


Cleaned up  R map which also makes PA06 more red. Not sure what the point of these antics are when all this does is antagonize Dems who might be interested in a compromise.

Why should we compromise when we control the State Supreme Court?

Because they'll probably draw a map that resembles the current map (that they drew) with a red seat in the middle cut out but with PA-7, PA-8, and PA-17 taking in more red territory. So a mostly fair map that has some competitive districts. It could be better to lock in an incumbent protection gerrymander type map.
Unless Republicans agree to a D-leaning PA-8, Democrats would be better off letting the court draw the map. And you have to get pretty creative to draw an incumbent protection map that would both pass muster with the court and actually protect Cartwright. Here's what I came up with: https://davesredistricting.org/join/7c175385-a006-42db-b014-3dffed8f0450
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,546


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #562 on: December 15, 2021, 08:47:55 AM »


Cleaned up  R map which also makes PA06 more red. Not sure what the point of these antics are when all this does is antagonize Dems who might be interested in a compromise.

Why should we compromise when we control the State Supreme Court?

Because they'll probably draw a map that resembles the current map (that they drew) with a red seat in the middle cut out but with PA-7, PA-8, and PA-17 taking in more red territory. So a mostly fair map that has some competitive districts. It could be better to lock in an incumbent protection gerrymander type map.
Unless Republicans agree to a D-leaning PA-8, Democrats would be better off letting the court draw the map. And you have to get pretty creative to draw an incumbent protection map that would both pass muster with the court and actually protect Cartwright. Here's what I came up with: https://davesredistricting.org/join/7c175385-a006-42db-b014-3dffed8f0450

Dems could agree to make PA-08 quite a bit redder in order to protect PA-07.
Logged
CookieDamage
cookiedamage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,052


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #563 on: December 15, 2021, 09:12:55 AM »

What do you guys think would be better for the Philly area? Two plurality black districts or one majority black district?
Logged
CookieDamage
cookiedamage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,052


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #564 on: December 15, 2021, 09:57:45 AM »



My attempt at a fair map. 8 Biden, 9 Trump seats. CD1 is majority black, CD2 is plurality black.

I think in a regular year, seats 3, 4, 5, 8, possibly 9, and 16 would be competitive. CD3 would probably be Brian Fitzpatrick's new district, and would be his as long as he wants it. 5 is gonna be drifting away from Dems in the long run while 16 should be trending towards Dems. 8 probably went to Ds in 2018 and would probably flip next year back to the GOP. CD9 would probably be like a Cunningham or Horn district. Surprise DEM gain in 2018 only to flip back in 2020.

https://davesredistricting.org/join/ce9395fd-1cb2-4f6b-a15a-d68ae6c83ec6
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,135
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #565 on: December 15, 2021, 02:27:44 PM »

Here's a fairish map designed to please the PAGOP--perhaps like the sort of fair map a Republican court would have made in overruling a Dem gerrymander.

Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,386
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #566 on: December 15, 2021, 02:34:34 PM »

Here's a fairish map designed to please the PAGOP--perhaps like the sort of fair map a Republican court would have made in overruling a Dem gerrymander.


I don't see a court splitting Bucks, but otherwise, this does look like a "court" sort of map.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #567 on: December 16, 2021, 04:23:50 PM »
« Edited: December 16, 2021, 04:27:18 PM by lfromnj »



Senate seems GOP favorable.
FWIW the current map has 25 Biden seats lol.


House seems like a sorta Dem gerrymander. Dems went all in for Luzerne with 4 Trump but still downballot D seats.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #568 on: December 16, 2021, 04:44:19 PM »

Both seem way more neutral than what we have now, if I'm not mistaken. Though that's a low bar considering both right now are extreme GOP gerrymanders
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #569 on: December 16, 2021, 04:48:30 PM »

Both seem way more neutral than what we have now, if I'm not mistaken. Though that's a low bar considering both right now are extreme GOP gerrymanders

I mean the  Republican PA state supreme court did block the initial proposals for excessive city/county splits.

Even then Biden actually has 25 seats on the current map compared to 24 on the new map
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #570 on: December 16, 2021, 05:37:38 PM »

Both seem way more neutral than what we have now, if I'm not mistaken. Though that's a low bar considering both right now are extreme GOP gerrymanders

I mean the  Republican PA state supreme court did block the initial proposals for excessive city/county splits.

Even then Biden actually has 25 seats on the current map compared to 24 on the new map

Rearrange Lancaster County and you get a lean Biden seat and get back to 25.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #571 on: December 16, 2021, 06:14:51 PM »
« Edited: December 16, 2021, 06:18:25 PM by lfromnj »

Also wondering about the legality of the Lackawanna/Luzerne senate districts. Not sure why it was drawn like that either. There is a double cross.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,692
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #572 on: December 16, 2021, 06:35:56 PM »

We're so screwed in Redistricting, since Sinema won't pass Voting Rights
Logged
Boss_Rahm
Rookie
**
Posts: 206


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #573 on: December 16, 2021, 10:49:27 PM »

Senate seems GOP favorable.
FWIW the current map has 25 Biden seats lol.

Looking at the number of Biden/Trump districts doesn't tell the whole story here. Republican Senators Browne and Tomlinson both survived the '18 wave in Biden districts, and would've been tough to beat under the old map in a more GOP-friendly year. Under the new map, Browne's SD-16 moved to a more rural area, creating an open Allentown-based seat (SD-14) that voted for Biden by 9 points. Tomlinson got safer in SD-6, but so did Democrat Steve Santarsiero in SD-10, who would've been more vulnerable under the old map. Similarly, in Allegheny County SD-37 shifted right and SD-38 shifted left, to benefit an incumbent in each party. And lastly, SD-15 moved entirely within Dauphin County, shifting it from a Trump district to a Biden +15 district.

So overall, Democrats will likely pick up 2 seats from this map. A fairer map would've included a Democratic-leaning Lancaster-area seat, but this one still undoes a good chunk of the gerrymandering compared to last decade's map.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #574 on: December 22, 2021, 01:18:31 PM »

I take back what I said - the new House map seems very fair (102-101 Biden) but the new state senate map seems more trash than what I originally thought.

Realized that my home district in Montco, currently with Katie Muth (D) is going from 42-40 R edge to a 47-36 R edge which is ... an incredibly jarring change. Especially for a Montco district which continues to trend left (and my particular township does as well)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 37  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.092 seconds with 12 queries.