Who did most “neocons” prefer in the Republican primaries?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:07:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  Who did most “neocons” prefer in the Republican primaries?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who did most “neocons” prefer in the Republican primaries?
#1
Jeb
 
#2
Rubio
 
#3
Cruz
 
#4
Kasich
 
#5
Christie
 
#6
Huckabee
 
#7
Pataki
 
#8
Graham
 
#9
Perry
 
#10
Walker
 
#11
Huckabee
 
#12
Santorum
 
#13
Other
 
#14
They were split between the candidates
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Who did most “neocons” prefer in the Republican primaries?  (Read 895 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 02, 2019, 03:12:00 AM »

I’m using the definition of “neocon” that includes Bush 43, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and McCain, not the definition that only includes people like Scoop Jackson, Wolfowitz, and Elliott Abrams.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2019, 03:14:53 AM »

Jeb, Rubio, and Graham would have have disproportionate neocon support. I'm not sure where they went with the last 3 candidates standing.
Logged
100% pro-life no matter what
ExtremeRepublican
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,721


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 5.57


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2019, 01:17:06 PM »

Jeb, Rubio, and Graham would have have disproportionate neocon support. I'm not sure where they went with the last 3 candidates standing.

They probably split between Cruz and Kasich depending on how socially conservative they were when it got down to those two and Trump.
Logged
coolface1572
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2019, 01:34:46 PM »

Graham fits their ideology best overall. Most supported Jeb! at first and then Rubio of those who ever had a chance.

I guess they really like people from Florida.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,839
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2019, 03:47:47 PM »

I voted for Jeb
Logged
Libertas Vel Mors
Haley/Ryan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,310
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2019, 03:54:55 PM »

I was Rubio (before I realized he was too lefty on economic issues) -> Cruz -----------------------> Trump in the GE.
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2019, 04:29:14 PM »

Summer 2015: Graham
Fall 2015: Jeb!
Winter 2015-16: Rubio
Spring 2016: Kasich
Summer 2016: Giant meteor
Logged
Beefalow and the Consumer
Beef
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,123
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.77, S: -8.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2019, 04:31:14 PM »

By the time primary season rolled around, the most neocon candidate still standing was probably Hillary Clinton.
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,529


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2019, 11:19:03 PM »

By the time the voting was under way, definitely Rubio.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 15 queries.