Dem internal MO Gov Parsons vulnerable

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/26/missouri-2020-election-governor-race-democrats-gov-mike-parson/4307963002/


PARSONS 45
GALLOWAY 36

Emily's list already endorsed Galloway 🤩

[RI]

An R up by nine in a D internal is vulnerable? Okay.

[MT Treasurer]

Too bad Galloway isn’t as "relatable" and "authentic" as Jason Kander.

[President Johnson]

Parson isn't vulnerable, he'll win by high single digits to low/mid double digits.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Parson isn't vulnerable, he'll win by high single digits to low/mid double digits.

We still got 9 months to go. Dems just recruited a great candidate in MO-2 to take on Wagner. I think the cool reception to impeach Trump is breaking in favor of removing him

[Tekken_Guy]

Parson isn't vulnerable, he'll win by high single digits to low/mid double digits.

We still got 9 months to go. Dems just recruited a great candidate in MO-2 to take on Wagner. I think the cool reception to impeach Trump is breaking in favor of removing him

MO-2 is way more blue than the state overall. Trump is still popular in the state and will win by double digits.

[Xing]

Yawn, Safe R.

[SnowLabrador]

Yawn, Safe R.

[Frenchrepublican]

Yawn, Safe R.

This but just seriously

[Xing]

Yawn, Safe R.

This but just seriously

I was being serious.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

MO was only Lean R in 1 election,  2018, MO trended D in every other election: even in 2016, when Kander was on the ballot it trended D. 2012 McCaskill won, 2008 Obama almost won it and 2006 McCaskill won it. Same with OH, 2016, it trended R. Most other elections it trended D, only due to Portman. Conserves are making OH and MO and IA as rubber stamp R states.

Galloway isnt 17 points down, she is now single digits down with 9 mnths left til election

[I Can Now Die Happy]

Republicans have been consistently underestimated in Missouri. To my shame I made the mistake of being overly manipulated by Atlas consensus last year, and started to suspect Hawley would lose, rather than trust my gut which said he'd easily win.

While gubernatorial races are less partisan I have faith that whoever the GOP runs will be good enough to win. I'd argue that Akin would've done better in 2018 (maybe even won by a tiny margin) than he did in 2012, even if his campaign was run the same way.

[Yellowhammer]

Republicans have been consistently underestimated in Missouri. To my shame I made the mistake of being overly manipulated by Atlas consensus last year, and started to suspect Hawley would lose, rather than trust my gut which said he'd easily win.

While gubernatorial races are less partisan I have faith that whoever the GOP runs will be good enough to win. I'd argue that Akin would've done better in 2018 (maybe even won by a tiny margin) than he did in 2012, even if his campaign was run the same way.

There never was much evidence to support the idea that McCaskill might win.

[Libertas Vel Mors]

MO was only Lean R in 1 election,  2018, MO trended D in every other election: even in 2016, when Kander was on the ballot it trended D. 2012 McCaskill won, 2008 Obama almost won it and 2006 McCaskill won it. Same with OH, 2016, it trended R. Most other elections it trended D, only due to Portman. Conserves are making OH and MO and IA as rubber stamp R states.

Galloway isnt 17 points down, she is now single digits down with 9 mnths left til election

Lmao no it didn't, Missouri has trended R in every election since 1996

[I Can Now Die Happy]

Republicans have been consistently underestimated in Missouri. To my shame I made the mistake of being overly manipulated by Atlas consensus last year, and started to suspect Hawley would lose, rather than trust my gut which said he'd easily win.

While gubernatorial races are less partisan I have faith that whoever the GOP runs will be good enough to win. I'd argue that Akin would've done better in 2018 (maybe even won by a tiny margin) than he did in 2012, even if his campaign was run the same way.

There never was much evidence to support the idea that McCaskill might win.

Indeed, I was foolish to take Atlas consensus so seriously.

[Frenchrepublican]

Republicans have been consistently underestimated in Missouri. To my shame I made the mistake of being overly manipulated by Atlas consensus last year, and started to suspect Hawley would lose, rather than trust my gut which said he'd easily win.

While gubernatorial races are less partisan I have faith that whoever the GOP runs will be good enough to win. I'd argue that Akin would've done better in 2018 (maybe even won by a tiny margin) than he did in 2012, even if his campaign was run the same way.

There never was much evidence to support the idea that McCaskill might win.

Well, polls had Hawley tied or even losing by a small margin, but what many people forget is that polls very usually underestimate republicans in MO (MO GOV 2016 is another example)

[jamestroll]

Republicans have been consistently underestimated in Missouri. To my shame I made the mistake of being overly manipulated by Atlas consensus last year, and started to suspect Hawley would lose, rather than trust my gut which said he'd easily win.

While gubernatorial races are less partisan I have faith that whoever the GOP runs will be good enough to win. I'd argue that Akin would've done better in 2018 (maybe even won by a tiny margin) than he did in 2012, even if his campaign was run the same way.

There never was much evidence to support the idea that McCaskill might win.

Especially after Greitens resigned I pretty much gave up on McCaskill winning. Not sure why so many people believed McCaskill would win right to the very end.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Due to fact Sinema and Rosen were surging at the same time McCaskill and Heitkamp were behind. We thought it would be a small change, they would win and Hawley isnt Blunt or Kit Bond popular.  But, MO is an R state, now as so wi be MTl