Would Adkins have won over 65% in Elliot County?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:22:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Would Adkins have won over 65% in Elliot County?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Would Adkins have won over 65% in Elliot County?  (Read 515 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 06, 2019, 09:45:52 PM »

Legitimately curious, no memes here.

Beshear won 59% and Adkins is Mr. Elliot County. He carried over 90%? of the vote here in the primary. What would we have achieved in the general had he won the nom like I hoped?
Logged
coolface1572
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2019, 10:13:07 PM »

No doubt about it. It is where he lives after all.
Logged
krb08
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2019, 10:13:17 PM »

It's a given that he would have. I really wish I could see what an Adkins statewide win would've looked like, because he surely would've won by a higher margin than Beshear. He could've even won more than 70% of the vote in Elliott.
Logged
At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder
LouisvilleThunder
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,902
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: 1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2019, 12:41:55 AM »

It's a given that he would have. I really wish I could see what an Adkins statewide win would've looked like, because he surely would've won by a higher margin than Beshear. He could've even won more than 70% of the vote in Elliott.
Adkins might've done worse in the Cinciburbs and Oldham County though as well as Louisville, but overall I think Adkins would make up for it across the rurals in the rest of the state to win by around 5.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2019, 05:00:29 PM »

It's a given that he would have. I really wish I could see what an Adkins statewide win would've looked like, because he surely would've won by a higher margin than Beshear. He could've even won more than 70% of the vote in Elliott.
Adkins might've done worse in the Cinciburbs and Oldham County though as well as Louisville, but overall I think Adkins would make up for it across the rurals in the rest of the state to win by around 5.

The map would be glorious.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2019, 05:06:45 PM »

Hopefully KY Dems will nominate Adkins for Senate so we can see the Mitch +9 map.
Logged
coolface1572
Guest
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2019, 10:04:22 PM »

Hopefully KY Dems will nominate Adkins for Senate so we can see the Mitch +9 map.

It probably wouldn't look much different than when he ran against Bruce Lunsford.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2019, 08:37:46 AM »

Hopefully KY Dems will nominate Adkins for Senate so we can see the Mitch +9 map.

It probably wouldn't look much different than when he ran against Bruce Lunsford.
That map in the year 2020 is delicious.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.