Rank the Southern States from easiest to hardest to win for Democrats
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:19:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Rank the Southern States from easiest to hardest to win for Democrats
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Rank the Southern States from easiest to hardest to win for Democrats  (Read 1485 times)
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 08, 2019, 08:51:33 PM »

I can't see Arkansas, Alabama, or Tennessee ever going Dem

Alabama and Tennessee.....yes.

Maddox, Dean, Hood could have won.
Logged
QAnonKelly
dotard
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 09, 2019, 11:44:44 AM »

FL Gov belongs in a tier of its own for Democrats - fool’s gold. Always so close, yet so far. SC should be ahead of AR and TX Gov should become more competitive once Abbott retires.

Not with George P Bush being on the horizon. To me SC in this analogy is MS and AR is KY , with KY/AR being the more redder state at the Presidential level and in a pure gen dem vs gen gop race but they are more elastic as well

Texas is a trending D state that will have had R governors for thirty years, whenever Abbott retires, his replacement will almost certainly be a D. No one named “George Bush” is going to win any sort of marques race anytime soon too. Even if he’s fairly moderate and a good fit on paper, which he is.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,753


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 09, 2019, 12:05:14 PM »

FL Gov belongs in a tier of its own for Democrats - fool’s gold. Always so close, yet so far. SC should be ahead of AR and TX Gov should become more competitive once Abbott retires.

Not with George P Bush being on the horizon. To me SC in this analogy is MS and AR is KY , with KY/AR being the more redder state at the Presidential level and in a pure gen dem vs gen gop race but they are more elastic as well

Texas is a trending D state that will have had R governors for thirty years, whenever Abbott retires, his replacement will almost certainly be a D. No one named “George Bush” is going to win any sort of marques race anytime soon too. Even if he’s fairly moderate and a good fit on paper, which he is.


Bush is still a popular figure in Texas , heck he was popular in Texas in 09 when he left with an approval in the mid 20s .



It’s trending D but not fast enough for them to defeat George P Bush in 2022.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,037
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 09, 2019, 01:44:44 PM »

1. Virginia (obviously)
2. North Carolina
3. Georgia
4. Florida
5. South Carolina. The unheralded Dem nominee only lost by 8 last year
6. Louisiana
7. West Virginia
8. Kentucky
9. Texas
10. Mississippi
11. Alabama
12. Oklahoma
13. Tennessee
14. Arkansas
Logged
QAnonKelly
dotard
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 09, 2019, 01:58:20 PM »

FL Gov belongs in a tier of its own for Democrats - fool’s gold. Always so close, yet so far. SC should be ahead of AR and TX Gov should become more competitive once Abbott retires.

Not with George P Bush being on the horizon. To me SC in this analogy is MS and AR is KY , with KY/AR being the more redder state at the Presidential level and in a pure gen dem vs gen gop race but they are more elastic as well

Texas is a trending D state that will have had R governors for thirty years, whenever Abbott retires, his replacement will almost certainly be a D. No one named “George Bush” is going to win any sort of marques race anytime soon too. Even if he’s fairly moderate and a good fit on paper, which he is.


>popular
> when he left with an approval in the mid 20s .
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,753


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 09, 2019, 02:04:47 PM »

FL Gov belongs in a tier of its own for Democrats - fool’s gold. Always so close, yet so far. SC should be ahead of AR and TX Gov should become more competitive once Abbott retires.

Not with George P Bush being on the horizon. To me SC in this analogy is MS and AR is KY , with KY/AR being the more redder state at the Presidential level and in a pure gen dem vs gen gop race but they are more elastic as well

Texas is a trending D state that will have had R governors for thirty years, whenever Abbott retires, his replacement will almost certainly be a D. No one named “George Bush” is going to win any sort of marques race anytime soon too. Even if he’s fairly moderate and a good fit on paper, which he is.


>popular
> when he left with an approval in the mid 20s .


He left with an approval in mid 20s nation wide not in Texas lol. In Texas it was still in lower 40s early 50s I think .


Now it’s even higher lol, a Bush won’t get elected nation wide but they will in Texas



Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 11 queries.