Did Democrats become anti-gun in reaction to Dukakis’s defeat?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:50:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Did Democrats become anti-gun in reaction to Dukakis’s defeat?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did Democratic politicians become anti-gun in reaction the Willie Horton ads and Dukakis getting defeated?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Did Democrats become anti-gun in reaction to Dukakis’s defeat?  (Read 480 times)
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,505
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 31, 2019, 11:37:30 PM »

Did Democratic politicians become anti-gun to peal away “law and order” voters from Republicans?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,088
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2019, 11:40:12 PM »

No. If anything, it's fascinating how little Dukakis' support of gun control hurt him in areas that by 2004 were considered conservative strongholds.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,283
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2019, 11:58:14 PM »

Guns did not become a cultural talisman for white grievances until the early 1990s.

The National Rifle Association was once, as its name suggested, a very boring, obscure organization for hunting and sport shooters. Its primary purpose was teaching gun safety and marksmanship. It never opposed gun control, particularly of handguns which were regarded as outside its purview and associated with urban crime.

Wayne LaPierre is the one who really transformed the group into a Republican mouthpiece and haven for black helicopter conspiracy theorists.
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,702
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2019, 12:21:21 AM »

Guns did not become a cultural talisman for white grievances until the early 1990s.

The National Rifle Association was once, as its name suggested, a very boring, obscure organization for hunting and sport shooters. Its primary purpose was teaching gun safety and marksmanship. It never opposed gun control, particularly of handguns which were regarded as outside its purview and associated with urban crime.

Wayne LaPierre is the one who really transformed the group into a Republican mouthpiece and haven for black helicopter conspiracy theorists.

Came here to post this but you put it better than I could have.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2019, 08:40:03 AM »

Did Democratic politicians become anti-gun to peal away “law and order” voters from Republicans?

Maybe they then approached it in a way that sparked a new culture war?
Logged
McNukes™ #NYCMMWasAHero
Nuke
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 854
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.23, S: 8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2019, 10:40:32 AM »

Guns did not become a cultural talisman for white grievances until the early 1990s.

The National Rifle Association was once, as its name suggested, a very boring, obscure organization for hunting and sport shooters. Its primary purpose was teaching gun safety and marksmanship. It never opposed gun control, particularly of handguns which were regarded as outside its purview and associated with urban crime.

Wayne LaPierre is the one who really transformed the group into a Republican mouthpiece and haven for black helicopter conspiracy theorists.
It actually rejected the post-Kennedy assassination gun control of the 60s, before Wayne LaPierre took control of the organization, and only flipped on one gun control law that it endorsed previously. It was originally established as a means to ensure that civilians would be able to use firearms so they could be drafted and sent to war, after all--and it received DoD subsidies until the Great Depression to fund that mission. Congress would often consult the NRA to see which gun control provisions it should support previously, thus giving rise to the idea that the NRA has literally written America's gun laws, but after the Congress began passing gun laws which were seen as negative for the country as a whole the NRA soon began its lobbying division.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.