North Carolina 2020 Redistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:12:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  North Carolina 2020 Redistricting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: North Carolina 2020 Redistricting  (Read 86589 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« on: December 03, 2019, 10:08:11 PM »

Most of these new CDs are fair. The only exception are 7, 8, and 9 being at least Likely R, as opposed to a CD combining Fayetteville, Lumberton, and Wilmington into 1 or 2 districts, which could have produced at least a tossup CD.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2021, 05:02:20 PM »

So David Price is retiring. Wonder if the Republicans will try to draw out his district to prevent another Dem from winning there

Wow. I live in NC-4. Just saw this here first.

I don't think this will change the make-up of the new NC-4.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2021, 05:06:08 PM »


No it is pretty much given now that the goal is to just remove the 3 rural/exurban counties attached to this district and add a few ten thousand more from Wake. That is the one constant in all the maps that has happened in that it is just Durham + OC.

The current NC-4 doesn't have that. That was a previous NC-4 earlier in the decade.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2021, 06:40:34 PM »


No it is pretty much given now that the goal is to just remove the 3 rural/exurban counties attached to this district and add a few ten thousand more from Wake. That is the one constant in all the maps that has happened in that it is just Durham + OC.

The current NC-4 doesn't have that. That was a previous NC-4 earlier in the decade.

It has Granville/Franklin and the Eastern part of Chatham.

Sorry. I knew that, but hadn't really thought about Granville/Franklin as that was just added, and not really culturally similar, though eastern Chatham is definitely part of the Chapel Hill area.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2021, 11:03:53 PM »

All on the line NC says there is a map that seems to be 12-2. Obviously that would violate the VRA and/or be a dummymander, but what would that even look like?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1449037318757752834.html
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2021, 09:14:57 PM »

Trying to figure out the renumbering and where each congressperson will run:

NC-1: old NC-3 Murphy
NC-2: old NC-1 Butterfield
NC-3: old NC-7 Rouzer
NC-5: old NC-2 Ross
NC-6: old NC-4 Price's replacement
NC-9: old NC-12 Adams
NC-13: new district NC House speaker Tim Moore will run
NC-14: old NC-11 Cawthorn

any guesses on the others?
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2021, 10:34:05 PM »

Wow. This must be really new news. I'm real-life friends with Jasmine Beach-Ferrara (D candidate in NC-14) and I haven't heard from her campaign about this yet.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2022, 04:32:57 PM »

Great news! Dumb (but not surprising) for the GOP to try to pass a map just as partisan as the map that was rejected for use in the 2020 election.


I think this is an authentic 8-7 map,  the courts would probably like it.

I don't think the courts will allow an 8-7 map.Wink
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2022, 05:25:28 PM »

I wasn't sure if the post about Wasserman that you just deleted, was serious or not.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2022, 11:12:16 PM »

Mainly a good map, but I really don't like the 9th, especially if I am in it (I'm in Chapel Hill).
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2022, 07:29:19 PM »

If this is the map, it's an improvement over the map that was struck down, but it's not the map we should be getting. Yes, it has more competitive districts, but there's a decent chance it could go 10-4 in 2022, and a non-negligible chance for 11-3.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


« Reply #11 on: February 18, 2022, 08:44:14 PM »

What are the links to the other maps?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.