North Carolina 2020 Redistricting
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:44:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  North Carolina 2020 Redistricting
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 66
Author Topic: North Carolina 2020 Redistricting  (Read 86525 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1100 on: February 15, 2022, 08:28:42 PM »

That district 9 is certainly unexpected... looks like a swingy district though
It took me a bit to realize they drew Union County and Chapel Hill in the same district.
The 9th looks like a seat drawn specifically to be competitive.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1101 on: February 15, 2022, 08:30:37 PM »

That district 9 is certainly unexpected... looks like a swingy district though

Trump +7, its missing 30k of Orange given to the Durham district.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,662
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1102 on: February 15, 2022, 08:33:58 PM »

Looks like a map to maximize competitive districts, and uncrack Guilford/Forsyth.

If Republicans manage to win that NC-8 this year, it'll be a two year rental and nothing more.
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1103 on: February 15, 2022, 08:36:14 PM »

Did a rough sketch of the notable districts in DRA, my estimates for the interesting districts:

NC-01: Biden+7, Cooper+13
NC-07: Trump+16.5, Forest+10
NC-08: Biden+0.1 (like 500 votes, could've gone either way, very marginal either way), Cooper+4.5
NC-09: Trump+8.5 (also lmao), Forest+2
NC-11: Trump+10, Forest+4
NC-14: Trump+3, Cooper+5
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1104 on: February 15, 2022, 08:36:34 PM »

Looks like a map to maximize competitive districts, and uncrack Guilford/Forsyth.

If Republicans manage to win that NC-8 this year, it'll be a two year rental and nothing more.

Except they very likely to redraw post 2022 anyways. I think their goal here is to reduce Ds to 4.5 seats in 2022 (depending upon NC-01), and then redraw to reduce them to 4.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1105 on: February 15, 2022, 08:39:46 PM »

That district 9 is certainly unexpected... looks like a swingy district though
It took me a bit to realize they drew Union County and Chapel Hill in the same district.
The 9th looks like a seat drawn specifically to be competitive.

If this is the map, then there appears to be the goal of making sure the Democratic primary voters in the swing seats are going to be nominating candidates with geographic (media markets), financial (PoC in the 14th), or potentially ideological (college town vs suburbs) disadvantages. The MS SD-21 situation only applied for partisan rather racial gerrymandering.

 I wonder if the court would accept something like this. Maybe it is good enough. Perhaps they already decided when delivering the opinion that nothing from the Leg would match their standards and something else was needed from a different party - as they gave themselves the power to do in the court order. We don't know.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1106 on: February 15, 2022, 08:39:56 PM »
« Edited: February 15, 2022, 08:47:07 PM by lfromnj »

Note this is the house proposal, I am waiting for the senate proposal as they were actually the ones to draw the congressional maps. The house had all the retarded bait maps while the senate had the lazer eye ones that were used as the basis for the enacted map.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1107 on: February 15, 2022, 08:43:10 PM »

Looks like a map to maximize competitive districts, and uncrack Guilford/Forsyth.

If Republicans manage to win that NC-8 this year, it'll be a two year rental and nothing more.

Except they very likely to redraw post 2022 anyways. I think their goal here is to reduce Ds to 4.5 seats in 2022 (depending upon NC-01), and then redraw to reduce them to 4.

The Guilford/Forsyth district actually keeps the black percentage relatively low, making it easier for any redraw in 2023 just incase.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1108 on: February 15, 2022, 08:47:14 PM »

That district 9 is certainly unexpected... looks like a swingy district though
It took me a bit to realize they drew Union County and Chapel Hill in the same district.
The 9th looks like a seat drawn specifically to be competitive.

If this is the map, then there appears to be the goal of making sure the Democratic primary voters in the swing seats are going to be nominating candidates with geographic (media markets), financial (PoC in the 14th), or potentially ideological (college town vs suburbs) disadvantages. The MS SD-21 situation only applied for partisan rather racial gerrymandering.

 I wonder if the court would accept something like this. Maybe it is good enough. Perhaps they already decided when delivering the opinion that nothing from the Leg would match their standards and something else was needed from a different party - as they gave themselves the power to do in the court order. We don't know.
What you said makes sense. It's quite cunning of them as well too.
I wonder what the Senate will cook up.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,239
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1109 on: February 15, 2022, 08:48:01 PM »
« Edited: February 15, 2022, 09:03:20 PM by Storr »

The suburban Charlotte NC-08 tossup seat is a welcome surprise. But a district stretching from Union County to Orange County? No thank you.

Edit: But my minimum acceptable NC congressional map for Democrats of 1 Charlotte seat, 1 Greensboro-Winston Salem seat, 2 Raleigh-Durham seats, 1 Northeastern rural DRA seat, and Fayetteville/Cumberland County and Asheville/Buncombe County each in one district undivided is satisfied. So I’m fine with the other weirdness/hackishness.
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,200
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1110 on: February 15, 2022, 08:48:03 PM »

I was wanting to be in a swing district. But I'm in the new 13 Sad
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1111 on: February 15, 2022, 08:48:42 PM »

Anyway this map is bad and dumb but it isn't horrible from a partisanship standpoint. NC-14 is distinctly winnable with the right candidate. Could certainly be better though.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1112 on: February 15, 2022, 08:49:13 PM »

I think there is enough here for the Democrats to turn it down.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1113 on: February 15, 2022, 08:53:28 PM »

Eyeballing it, is the 14th roughly 12% Native?
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1114 on: February 15, 2022, 08:54:30 PM »

I think there is enough here for the Democrats to turn it down.

A lot of NC legislative Democratic leaders come from Chapel Hill.
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,200
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1115 on: February 15, 2022, 09:04:00 PM »

From my understanding. This is the House's map. The one that matter is the Senate map. They seem to be the playmakers.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1116 on: February 15, 2022, 09:05:06 PM »

From my understanding. This is the House's map. The one that matter is the Senate map. They seem to be the playmakers.

Yup I am actually pretty sure this is close to one of Hall's earlier's drafts . The Senate makes the maps.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,532
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1117 on: February 15, 2022, 09:22:11 PM »

I think there is enough here for the Democrats to turn it down.

A lot of NC legislative Democratic leaders come from Chapel Hill.

That in addition to the chopping up of the Triad black community.
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,147
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1118 on: February 15, 2022, 09:24:25 PM »

Looks like a map to maximize competitive districts, and uncrack Guilford/Forsyth.

If Republicans manage to win that NC-8 this year, it'll be a two year rental and nothing more.

Except they very likely to redraw post 2022 anyways. I think their goal here is to reduce Ds to 4.5 seats in 2022 (depending upon NC-01), and then redraw to reduce them to 4.

The Guilford/Forsyth district actually keeps the black percentage relatively low, making it easier for any redraw in 2023 just incase.

Yeah this kind of smells like a "bongcloud opening"--either they're doing troll maps to make their lazer maps look good, or this is designed to be struck down by a Republican court.
Logged
If my soul was made of stone
discovolante
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,261
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1119 on: February 15, 2022, 09:44:54 PM »

Butterfield's seat here is extremely unoptimized. I have no idea why there are so many rural white counties in there when they could just scoop out Goldsboro and Kinston instead. (I mean, I know it's to make it "competitive", but shouldn't ensuring minority representation be more important?)
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1120 on: February 15, 2022, 10:23:36 PM »



Yeah Woodhouse is highly skeptical of it being the map.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,371


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1121 on: February 15, 2022, 10:26:46 PM »

Butterfield's seat here is extremely unoptimized. I have no idea why there are so many rural white counties in there when they could just scoop out Goldsboro and Kinston instead. (I mean, I know it's to make it "competitive", but shouldn't ensuring minority representation be more important?)



Basically seems what a black Democrat drew.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1122 on: February 15, 2022, 10:27:42 PM »



Yeah Woodhouse is highly skeptical of it being the map.

Ye, that 9th seems like something the Senate is unlikely to do; my guess is the Senate will draw something more akin to the 2020 map. This map I think will fail to pass muster with the court for a few of the reasons some have mentioned (leaving black parts of Greensboro out of the 6th, the 9th district, if that 8th really is a Trump district 9-5 is probably a bit too GOP friendly), but it is better.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1123 on: February 15, 2022, 10:31:24 PM »

Butterfield's seat here is extremely unoptimized. I have no idea why there are so many rural white counties in there when they could just scoop out Goldsboro and Kinston instead. (I mean, I know it's to make it "competitive", but shouldn't ensuring minority representation be more important?)



Basically seems what a black Democrat drew.

Overall CBK 5 is a pretty fair map; something like CST-6 is where it goes too far and there's a clear Dem bias of unpacking Durham.

I personally prefer the Charlotte district to be higher VAP and more centralized rather than putting like 100k worth of heavily AA precincts into 9 to make it more competative.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1124 on: February 15, 2022, 11:12:16 PM »

Mainly a good map, but I really don't like the 9th, especially if I am in it (I'm in Chapel Hill).
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 ... 66  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 13 queries.