|           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 12, 2020, 12:59:41 am
News:
If you are having trouble logging in due to invalid user name / pass:

Consider resetting your account password, as you may have forgotten it over time if using a password manager.

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, Senator YE, ON Progressive)
  Suffolk/USA Today: Three Way Race In Iowa
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Suffolk/USA Today: Three Way Race In Iowa  (Read 1111 times)
Torrain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,454
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 21, 2019, 05:46:18 am »
« edited: October 21, 2019, 11:55:08 am by Torranski »

Results are in, in article form
Undecided at 29%
Biden at 18%
Warren at 17%
Buttigieg at 13%
Sanders at 9%
Steyer, Klobuchar, Harris, Gabbard at 3%
Yang, Booker, O’Rourke at1%
Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Williamson at 0%

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/10/21/iowa-caucuses-pete-buttigieg-elizabeth-warren-joe-biden-top-poll/4025797002/
Logged
wbrocks67
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,068
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2019, 05:49:40 am »

Ah, so when Buttigieg goes after his opponents people like him more, but when Harris went after Biden, she was "mean" (or Castro for that matter). Funny how that works, huh?
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,881
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2019, 06:11:03 am »

Ah, so when Buttigieg goes after his opponents people like him more, but when Harris went after Biden, she was "mean" (or Castro for that matter). Funny how that works, huh?

Whoever talks about misogyny in American politics is an establishment neoliberal shill.
Logged
bilaps
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,023
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2019, 06:13:46 am »

Ah, so when Buttigieg goes after his opponents people like him more, but when Harris went after Biden, she was "mean" (or Castro for that matter). Funny how that works, huh?

It must be sexism, that's why Warren is in a tie for first
Logged
wbrocks67
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,068
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2019, 06:21:01 am »

Ah, so when Buttigieg goes after his opponents people like him more, but when Harris went after Biden, she was "mean" (or Castro for that matter). Funny how that works, huh?

It must be sexism, that's why Warren is in a tie for first

Not really talking about gender.
Logged
Zaybay
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.25, S: -6.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2019, 06:35:16 am »

I know Suffolk is known for undecideds, but 30% is kinda ridiculous.
Logged
Beat-‘Em-All Beto
Clinton1996
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2019, 07:17:51 am »

Can Buttigieg’s campaign just die already. The media hard-on for this guy is insufferable. He does the exact same things Beto was ravaged for when he announced (speaks in platitudes, no experience, no plans). But it’s okay because he speaks Swedish.

Then he goes out and attacks the other candidates with bs talking points (“We were this close to banning assault weapons until you said we should have a mandatory buyback”) and he’s praised for having passion, but when Castro and Harris do it their just mean and nasty. I’ll be happy when Bernie and Warren tag-team this guy out of the running next debate.
Logged
Cinemark
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2019, 07:25:50 am »

Thats a debate qualifying poll for Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer.

Klobuchar needs two more, Gabbard needs three.

Not sure how many Steyer needs.
Logged
Progressive Icon Bill de Blasio
Randall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 751
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2019, 07:28:54 am »

Thats a debate qualifying poll for Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer.

Klobuchar needs two more, Gabbard needs three.

Not sure how many Steyer needs.

This is an early state poll - qualifying, yes, but they have to hit 5%. 3% is for national polls.
Logged
Cinemark
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 870


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2019, 07:30:55 am »

Thats a debate qualifying poll for Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer.

Klobuchar needs two more, Gabbard needs three.

Not sure how many Steyer needs.

This is an early state poll - qualifying, yes, but they have to hit 5%. 3% is for national polls.

Oh...

Hmmm. Sucks for all the bottom tier candidates then. Harris included apparently.
Logged
Torrain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,454
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2019, 07:36:00 am »

Thats a debate qualifying poll for Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer.

Klobuchar needs two more, Gabbard needs three.

Not sure how many Steyer needs.

This is an early state poll - qualifying, yes, but they have to hit 5%. 3% is for national polls.

Thank goodness for that. Maybe we can finally winnow the field below 10 candidates.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,069


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2019, 07:56:32 am »
« Edited: October 21, 2019, 08:30:48 am by The Mikado »

Thats a debate qualifying poll for Gabbard, Klobuchar and Steyer.

Klobuchar needs two more, Gabbard needs three.

Not sure how many Steyer needs.

This is an early state poll - qualifying, yes, but they have to hit 5%. 3% is for national polls.

This is incorrect. The paths are either 4 national or early state over 3% or 2 early state over 5. Earlier poster is correct that this is #2 out of 4 for Klobuchat and 1 out of 4 for Harris.

Steyer's already qualified.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,537
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2019, 08:24:25 am »

Nina Turner, Krystal Ball, and Shuan King told me that Bernie was back! I didn't know that back meant being in fourth place with single digits in Iowa.
Logged
Pollster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,941


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2019, 08:32:39 am »

I'm old enough to remember when Harris was suddenly a top tier contender after the media foamed at the mouth over a debate performance too.
Logged
(CT) The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,930
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 21, 2019, 08:36:19 am »

Ah, so when Buttigieg goes after his opponents people like him more, but when Harris went after Biden, she was "mean" (or Castro for that matter). Funny how that works, huh?

It must be sexism, that's why Warren is in a tie for first

Not really talking about gender.

Yes, it must be racism. From a party who nominated a black guy 8 years ago and whos members members include almost every politically active African American in the country.

Could it be that maybe Kamala is just a crap candidate?
Logged
MR. KAYNE WEST
olawakandi
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 39,684
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2019, 08:39:04 am »

I dont know why AOC endorsed Sanders, but Sanders is done, Warren is gonna win the nomination. Hopefully, Biden places 3rd in IA
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,038
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2019, 08:58:09 am »

Full results here:

https://www.suffolk.edu/-/media/suffolk/documents/academics/research-at-suffolk/suprc/polls/other-states/2019/10_21_2019_marignals_pdftxt.pdf

Biden 18%
Warren 17%
Buttigieg 13%
Sanders 9%
Steyer 3%
Gabbard 3%
Harris 3%
Klobuchar 3%
Yang 1%
Booker 1%
O’Rourke 1%
Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Williamson 0%
Logged
Gulf Coastal Elite
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,264
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 21, 2019, 10:25:59 am »

Beautiful! Thank you Hillary!
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,598
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 21, 2019, 10:34:02 am »
« Edited: October 21, 2019, 10:37:32 am by Speaker OneJ »

I think the reason why Buttigieg probably improved upon his numbers post-debate while Harris and Castro dropped was that he didn't go after Warren. Sure, Warren is very well-liked among Democratic voters and is more popular now than Biden himself in favorability but many more voters might just have a stronger affection for Biden because they knew him for so long. Buttigieg smartly avoided this because his numbers could've dropped as well.

Also, I'm not sure if we can draw too many conclusions from this poll due to high amount of undecideds and Buttigieg was already polling around the lower double-digit range from other pollsters.

Here's the change from last poll:



Buttigieg "surged" from the last poll, but the poll was taken in late June/Early July.
Logged
adamevans
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 747
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 21, 2019, 10:37:05 am »

I dont know why AOC endorsed Sanders, but Sanders is done, Warren is gonna win the nomination. Hopefully, Biden places 3rd in IA

I pity those who find elections this predictable. Reminder: Biden is now +6 in RCP national average.
Logged
eric82oslo
Concerned Citizen
*****
Posts: 5,526
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 21, 2019, 12:07:04 pm »


She might be even higher now, cause I believe this poll was conducted entirely before the controversy broke out. Wink
Logged
From Prussia With Love
jdb
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,419
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2019, 02:05:11 pm »
« Edited: October 22, 2019, 09:10:55 pm by Mark Esperanto »

Can Buttigieg’s campaign just die already. The media hard-on for this guy is insufferable. He does the exact same things Beto was ravaged for when he announced (speaks in platitudes, no experience, no plans). But it’s okay because he speaks Swedish.

Then he goes out and attacks the other candidates with bs talking points (“We were this close to banning assault weapons until you said we should have a mandatory buyback”) and he’s praised for having passion, but when Castro and Harris do it their just mean and nasty. I’ll be happy when Bernie and Warren tag-team this guy out of the running next debate.

Beto is an empty suit running around like a chicken with its head cut off whereas not only does Buttigieg seem to be the real deal, but he’s also clearly the smartest person in the race with the possible exception of Warren (although Buttigieg seems to be the more honest of the two where policy is concerned).

And I’m as pro-gun control as it gets, but mandatory buybacks might be the dumbest ideas I’ve heard on this issue from the Democratic side.  When you say stupid things in a Presidential debate, sometimes you get called out for it.  Beto learned that the hard way.  The one time Harris made a coherent attack against Biden, she got her 15 minutes of fame as flavor of the month...only to blow it in spectacular fashion.  Castro is a C-list candidate at best who got criticized for how he went about his attack on Biden.

Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,957
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.23, S: -7.48

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 21, 2019, 02:12:12 pm »

How does junk like this count as qualifying but Economist/YouGov and Emerson don't?
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,783


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 21, 2019, 02:14:49 pm »

I do find it disappointing that Pete seems to have taken Amy K's lane. She is just way more qualified and more prepared to be Pres than a Mayor of a small town. Pete lost statewide race by 25% while Amy routinely wins in landslides I hope in the end voters realize who is the better candidate.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,820
United States



WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 21, 2019, 02:19:36 pm »

Congratulations, President Undecided!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.138 seconds with 15 queries.