Dental hygienist branded a 'sexual abuser' for treating wife
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 02:18:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Dental hygienist branded a 'sexual abuser' for treating wife
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Dental hygienist branded a 'sexual abuser' for treating wife  (Read 191 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,340
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 09, 2019, 01:16:07 PM »

link-Toronto Sun
Quote
A dental hygienist branded a sexual abuser because he treated his wife has lost his bid to have his licence revocation overturned.

Ontario’s Divisional Court decision upholding the “harsh” punishment for Alexandru Tanase comes even though regulators have proposed allowing hygienists to treat spouses as dentists may do.

“There is no other case of any dental hygienist anywhere in Canada who has been found guilty of sexual abuse for treating his wife,” the court said in its ruling. “It is indeed unfortunate that the (discipline committee) elected to proceed with the complaint.”

A disciplinary hearing arose after a complaint to the College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario from a colleague, who had spotted a June 2016 Facebook post from Tanase’s grateful wife, identified as S.M., about the care he had provided her.

Evidence before the discipline committee was that S.M. feared dental treatment and had had no care for several years when she became platonic friends with Tanase in 2012. He soon provided her with free in-office treatment.

In mid-2014, court records show, they became romantically involved and he stopped treating her because of the blanket ban on sexual relations between health-care professionals and their patients. The province enacted the zero-tolerance policy in 1993 to protect patients from exploitation. Consent is irrelevant.

<snip>

The discipline committee ruled it had no choice but to find Tanase had violated the ban on sexual relations with a patient — even though the patient was his spouse and the sex consensual — and therefore subject to mandatory licence revocation.
what do they think they're preventing by making this illegal?  It's all so weird.  What kind of idiots make this a law in the first place?  What kind of monster calls the authorities over it?  What kind of sh**t for brains discipline committee decided to enforce this regulation written by mental midgets?  Is everyone in the Canadian dental industry a complete moron or just the thousands of people needed to make this situation happen?
Logged
HisGrace
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,553
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2019, 05:57:00 PM »

This is so stupid. If the sexual relations pre-date the person being your patient I think it is fine. Zero tolerance policies result in stupid sh**t like this.

Stuff like this just waters down sex offenses. When you hear someone's a sex offender you have to wonder if they really are one or if it's just because of some dumb legal loophole.

Quote
Consent is irrelevant.

Is this going to be the "SJWs"/alt-left's new catchphrase? Everything comes full circle. It's not about consent, it's that they only want people to have sex when they say they can have sex.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2019, 10:50:29 PM »

saddest story in atlas history
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.