I think Lieberman probably would have lost a lot of votes, unfortunatly, because he is pro-war, and most pro-war people just would have voted for Bush, unless Liebermann could give them a good reason not to.
a majority of the country in 2004 supported the war. i dont think lieberman's pro-war stance would h ave hurt him in the general election...only in the democrat primary.
in 2004 i think a majority of voters probably *wanted* to replace bush, if they had a reasonable alternative. lieberman would have been a reasonable alternative in many people's eyes....unlike kerry.
