Planned parenthood gives up funding

[lfromnj]

https://www.npr.org/2019/08/19/752438119/planned-parenthood-out-of-title-x-over-trump-rule

[NeverAgainsSock]

"Planned Parenthood makes defiant stand against medieval Trump rule, strangling PP's ability to improve women's health"

FTFY

[MasterJedi]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

[Yellowhammer]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

[T'Chenka]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Narrow-minded.

Many forced-birth children will burden the welfare state and taxpayers. Be fiscally conservative and guve these women the freedom to choose.

[GM Team Member and Senator WB]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Real video of YH: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VhJ7NmU6lJI

[Indy Texas]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Have you ever done anything to reduce demand for abortion and make people want to continue their pregnancy? Have you done anything to improve access to medical care for women and young children, or increase resources available to young mothers?

If you were really pro-life, you'd be calling nonstop for more access to birth control and for child allowances for low-income women who literally cannot afford to raise a child. You'd be calling for more federal funding for research to cure genetic disorders so those pregnancies wouldn't be terminated.

That you don't do any of those things is just proof that all you care about is shaming women and interfering in private family decisions. You don't care about poor or vulnerable people at all.

[Hermit For Peace]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

But you know, the majority of the country support abortion. So I ask you, as the majority, we WANT to use federal funds to help Planned Parenthood do their job.

Why should YOUR opinion, which is in the minority, count for more? It shouldn't.

[DrScholl]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Only an insane President would use taxpayer dollars for substandard facilities to detain children and be forced by a court to allow said children access to proper hygiene.

[lfromnj]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

But you know, the majority of the country support abortion. So I ask you, as the majority, we WANT to use federal funds to help Planned Parenthood do their job.

Why should YOUR opinion, which is in the minority, count for more? It shouldn't.

Does it?

Abortion is pretty evenly divided,
https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx

And plenty of people don't want it funded even if it should be legal.

[Yellowhammer]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Narrow-minded.

Many forced-birth children will burden the welfare state and taxpayers. Be fiscally conservative and guve these women the freedom to choose.

Being “fiscally conservative” would mean abolishing the welfare state entirely.

[T'Chenka]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Narrow-minded.

Many forced-birth children will burden the welfare state and taxpayers. Be fiscally conservative and guve these women the freedom to choose.

Being “fiscally conservative” would mean abolishing the welfare state entirely.

There are degrees of fiscal conservatism, obviously. Our wealth inequality is already too large to abolish these programs.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Can't stop winning!

[lfromnj]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Narrow-minded.

Many forced-birth children will burden the welfare state and taxpayers. Be fiscally conservative and guve these women the freedom to choose.

They do, Just not while using taxpayer cash.

[lfromnj]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

[T'Chenka]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

It's the only realistic way for some women in rsome areas to get an abortion. Removing that one and only option in a first world country is disgusting and barbaric.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

They'll get it back when the next sane president is in office.

Only an insane president like Trump wouldn't want to force taxpayers to fund chopping up unborn children! Wanting to extort people to fund murder is the only reasonable opinion.

Hey, look, here's a Republican terrorist who agrees with you about the sanctity of life:
Chicago man arrested after allegedly threatening to kill people at women's reproductive health clinic

[At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder]

Can't stop winning!

[Associate Justice PiT]

     And I pray they don't get it back...at least until they stop performing abortions.

[Adam Griffin]

Can't wait for the next administration to render unto Caesar Planned Parenthood $50 billion so that irrespective of charlatans, we don't have to have this debate for another century.

[Slander and/or Libel]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

Because they're unwilling to let Trump and Pence dictate what their organization is allowed to do?

[S019]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

Planned Parenthood does many things other than abortion, they also provide women's health services, etc. Also many of these abortion procedures are expensive so, Planned Parenthood should continue to be funded. Also as many have already said, a majority of this nation is pro-choice and therefore the right to choose, should remain accessible to people, and it is already extremely difficult for many rural women to get abortions. This rule change will just make things even worse for women who need an abortion.

[Santander]

#standwithPP

[OSR stands with Israel]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

Planned Parenthood does many things other than abortion, they also provide women's health services, etc. Also many of these abortion procedures are expensive so, Planned Parenthood should continue to be funded. Also as many have already said, a majority of this nation is pro-choice and therefore the right to choose, should remain accessible to people, and it is already extremely difficult for many rural women to get abortions. This rule change will just make things even worse for women who need an abortion.

arent you pro-life though

[RI]

Can people just admit PP is about abortion. If its just 3% then why are they willing to lose funding over 97% instead of giving up 3%?

Abortion may be 3% of PP's procedures, but it's way more than that in terms of revenue.