Morning Consult 8/1-4: Biden 33 Sanders 19 Warren 15 Harris 9 Buttigieg 6
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:47:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Morning Consult 8/1-4: Biden 33 Sanders 19 Warren 15 Harris 9 Buttigieg 6
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Morning Consult 8/1-4: Biden 33 Sanders 19 Warren 15 Harris 9 Buttigieg 6  (Read 1414 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 05, 2019, 09:18:35 PM »

Biden 33 (0)
Sanders 19 (+1)
Warren 15 (+2)
Harris 9 (-4)
Buttigieg 6 (+1)
Booker 3 (0)
O'Rourke 3 (0)
Yang 2 (0)

Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Steyer, Williamson, and Ryan each have 1.
https://morningconsult.com/2020-democratic-primary/
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,997
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2019, 09:19:22 PM »

Tom Steyer is at 6% in early states??
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,774


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2019, 09:23:57 PM »

Biden 33 (0)
Sanders 19 (+1)
Warren 15 (+2)
Harris 9 (-4)
Buttigieg 6 (+1)
Booker 3 (0)
O'Rourke 3 (0)
Yang 2 (0)

Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Klobuchar, Steyer, Williamson, and Ryan each have 1.
https://morningconsult.com/2020-democratic-primary/

We'll have to see if other pollsters bear out a Harris decline, but if so, Biden might be in pretty solid shape, as Harris is the only person competing for his most important slice of the electorate (black voters).
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2019, 09:24:35 PM »

I think Harris also fell in second choices.  If I remember right, Harris was the top second choice of Warren and Buttigieg supporters, and now they go to Sanders and Warren, respectively.
Logged
Yank2133
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,387


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2019, 09:28:51 PM »

Lol, pundits are so bad at this. Booker was deemed the winner by many of them and yet he saw no movement.
Logged
Former Crackhead Mike Lindell
Randall
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,458
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2019, 09:32:01 PM »




Genuinely stunning numbers for Steyer, wow. I know he's pumping a lot of money into early state ads, but damn!
Logged
Roronoa D. Law
Patrick97
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2019, 09:37:06 PM »

Harris now has the 2nd highest unfavorables.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2019, 10:13:50 PM »

No noticeable change in the topline numbers other than Harris losing a bit of ground here. What's even more noticeable is the fact that the % of voters who view her unfavorably have climbed to 22% making it higher than even Biden or Sanders.

Also, 2nd choice results:

Biden supporters:
24% Sanders
20% Warren
15% Harris

Sanders supporters:
31% Biden
26% Warren
8% Harris

Warren supporters:
25% Sanders
22% Harris
17% Biden

Harris supporters:
26% Warren
24% Biden
12% Sanders

Buttigieg supporters:
21% Warren
18% Harris
17% Biden
Logged
Burke Bro
omelott
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,087
Israel



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2019, 10:16:20 PM »

Seeing Steyer so high nearly gave me a heart attack.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2019, 10:18:33 PM »

Seeing Steyer so high nearly gave me a heart attack.

I feel like Steyer always looks like he's high, but maybe that's just me.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2019, 10:21:11 PM »

DEVASTATING numbers for Officer Harris!  Morning Consult is notoriously unswingy.  Tulsi sure gave the nasty prosecutor a good blanchin’
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 05, 2019, 10:21:34 PM »


Yep, and Yang at 3% in early states. Cheesy Which probably means he's around 5-6% in New Hampshire. He should be doing great in Nevada too. And perhaps in South Carolina.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2019, 10:22:23 PM »

Steyer's numbers in early states are crazy & the only thing that shows is that having a lot of money is going to be crucial. You will be need money for grassroots staff & expensive TV ads to compete in Iowa, NH & especially California & Texas.

This poll just shows how much Warren is taking away from Sanders. It is going to be very hard for both of them to run strong campaigns & beat Joe Biden.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 06, 2019, 01:39:04 AM »

No noticeable change in the topline numbers other than Harris losing a bit of ground here. What's even more noticeable is the fact that the % of voters who view her unfavorably have climbed to 22% making it higher than even Biden or Sanders.

Also, 2nd choice results:

Biden supporters:
24% Sanders
20% Warren
15% Harris

Sanders supporters:
31% Biden
26% Warren
8% Harris

Warren supporters:
25% Sanders
22% Harris
17% Biden

Harris supporters:
26% Warren
24% Biden
12% Sanders

Buttigieg supporters:
21% Warren
18% Harris
17% Biden

Suspect maybe part of the reason for the Harris drop was that she tried to lay a hit on Biden in Night #2 and it fell a bit flat, especially compared to the 1st debate?

Still 2nd choice Biden/Sanders supporters are significant, and it does appear that Warren is at least # 3 in the race.....

Everything is still volatile here, and I would imagine the recent mass gun violence incidents, Gilroy and El Paso both committed at the hands of White Supremacists targeting Latino populations, as well as the Dayton shooting might shake up these numbers a bit more within the Democratic Primary, and allow political opportunity structures for candidates that we might not have considered to be proper contenders...
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 06, 2019, 01:49:56 AM »

Yang has leapfrogged in popularity after the second debate. His favorable number has increased more than 50%, while his unfavorable number has held steady. He now has a stronger net favorability than Gillibrand. Smiley

All candidates net favorability after 2nd debate:

1. Biden: +55%
2. Sanders: +54%
3. Warren: +46%
4. Buttigieg: +33%
5. Harris: +30%
6. Booker: +26%
7. Castro: +24%
8. O'Rourke: +23%
9. Klobuchar: +20%
10. Yang: +19%

11. Gillibrand: +17%
12. Gabbard: +12%
13. Inslee: +9%
14. Steyer: +8%
14. Bennet: +8%
16. Hickenlooper: +6%
17. Bullock: +5%
18. Moulton: +2%
18. Delaney: +2%
20. Ryan: +1%
21. Williamson: +/-0%
22. de Blasio: -7%


PS: Harris' unfavorable number is now worse than Williamson's at 22%, only beaten by de Blasio at 29%.
Logged
eric82oslo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,501
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -5.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2019, 01:51:58 AM »




Genuinely stunning numbers for Steyer, wow. I know he's pumping a lot of money into early state ads, but damn!

He's also a really good and kind person. Smiley He's not doing this for his own gain, but rather to save a nation. His heart is in the right place, just like it is for Yang and Warren.
Logged
John Dule
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,406
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.57, S: -7.50

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2019, 03:05:35 AM »


Gee, imagine that.
Logged
Annatar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 982
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2019, 03:58:54 AM »

It seems pretty clear Biden's inability to talk accurately at the debates isn't going to hurt him, Sanders & Warren are going to need something big to bring down his numbers.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,689
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2019, 04:02:48 AM »

It seems pretty clear Biden's inability to talk accurately at the debates isn't going to hurt him, Sanders & Warren are going to need something big to bring down his numbers.

Trump doesnt speak all that and the pausing of Beto between words seems like a handicap to me
Logged
Holy Unifying Centrist
DTC
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208


Political Matrix
E: 9.53, S: 10.54

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2019, 04:26:08 AM »

It seems pretty clear Biden's inability to talk accurately at the debates isn't going to hurt him, Sanders & Warren are going to need something big to bring down his numbers.

I mean he did pretty well in the last debate. His closing statement was bad, sure, but he was able to fight back against 30 different attacks and mostly went even / won every exchange (aside from one wit Booker).

I still think he won't be the nominee, though. There are a lot of months ahead of us. The concern about Biden's age and lack of being able to be dynamic as a result of that will lead to him eventually falling behind. He's probably my favorite of the people who have qualified for the third set of debates, but that doesn't mean I'm going to be a cheerleader for his chances.

I still think Elizabeth Warren is the most likely nominee
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,689
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2019, 05:43:50 AM »

Warren has dropped to 8% in natl polls and is losing badly in SC
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2019, 06:19:20 AM »

Hoping this is just a temporary downtick for Harris, though she's never gotten above like 14% in MC anyway. She's back to close to pre-debate levels.

Though I still think MC is wonky- they continue to have Bernie stronger than most other pollsters and Steyer is not at 6% in early states.

Happy though to see Gabbard got nothing from that debate.
Logged
SN2903
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,665
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: 3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2019, 06:27:38 AM »

Sad  Seems like the debate hurt Harris but Gabbard isn't gaining poll wise yet .
Logged
SN2903
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,665
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: 3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2019, 06:30:52 AM »

Hoping this is just a temporary downtick for Harris, though she's never gotten above like 14% in MC anyway. She's back to close to pre-debate levels.

Though I still think MC is wonky- they continue to have Bernie stronger than most other pollsters and Steyer is not at 6% in early states.

Happy though to see Gabbard got nothing from that debate.
I hope Trump wins 40 states against your joke of a party . Democrats are so stupid for not supporting gabbard
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2019, 06:34:20 AM »

Hoping this is just a temporary downtick for Harris, though she's never gotten above like 14% in MC anyway. She's back to close to pre-debate levels.

Though I still think MC is wonky- they continue to have Bernie stronger than most other pollsters and Steyer is not at 6% in early states.

Happy though to see Gabbard got nothing from that debate.
I hope Trump wins 40 states against your joke of a party . Democrats are so stupid for not supporting gabbard

Thank you for the maturity.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.