SUSA 50 State Approval.

[Alcon]

Wow, Murkowski's making a run for Taft.  It looks like, come 2006, Idaho may be the only state without a Democrat in any significant office, if the Dems can play on this.

What exactly has Matt Blunt done to deserve a 60%+ disapproval?

And what has happened to Bill Owens?  He used to be very popular.

[Alcon]

Wow, Murkowski's making a run for Taft.  It looks like, come 2006, Idaho may be the only state without a Democrat in any significant office, if the Dems can play on this.

What exactly has Matt Blunt done to deserve a 60%+ disapproval?

And what has happened to Bill Owens?  He used to be very popular.

You should add Texas.  You should see some of the candidates the Democrats are putting up for statewide office in 2006.  Geez.

I was including congressional representation - otherwise Utah would also fall into that category.

But, yes, Perry is getting a landslide he doesn't deserve.

[Alcon]

Wow, Murkowski's making a run for Taft.  It looks like, come 2006, Idaho may be the only state without a Democrat in any significant office, if the Dems can play on this.

What exactly has Matt Blunt done to deserve a 60%+ disapproval?

And what has happened to Bill Owens?  He used to be very popular.

You should add Texas.  You should see some of the candidates the Democrats are putting up for statewide office in 2006.  Geez.

I was including congressional representation - otherwise Utah would also fall into that category.

Ok, no problem.  Didn't understand your definition of "significant". 

Well, I suppose that varies.  I'm sure we can all name the congressional representatives of one-district states like South Dakota and Montana, but I suppose few people offhand know who represents TX-19 or CA-33 outside of Texas and California.