UK General Discussion: 2019. Blackadder goes Brexit.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:57:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion: 2019. Blackadder goes Brexit.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... 47
Author Topic: UK General Discussion: 2019. Blackadder goes Brexit.  (Read 71074 times)
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,829
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #475 on: September 09, 2019, 09:44:22 AM »

John Bercow, the HoC Speaker, is to stand down (as an MP also) by the end of the year.

(in other words at the next GE assuming, as is now very likely, there is one before then)

When taking over in summer 2009, he said he would not do more than a decade.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #476 on: September 09, 2019, 09:48:33 AM »

To rapturous applause from the opposition.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,129
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #477 on: September 09, 2019, 10:36:29 AM »
« Edited: September 09, 2019, 10:52:02 AM by Devout Centrist »

I think the most likely outcome is that Boris simply chooses to ignore the Benn Act. This is blatantly illegal, of course, but would anything really happen to him?
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #478 on: September 09, 2019, 10:43:19 AM »

Quite possibly. Considering he has no majority now.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,829
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #479 on: September 09, 2019, 10:53:33 AM »

The point is, just ignoring it would be *illegal*.
Logged
Helsinkian
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,837
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #480 on: September 09, 2019, 11:10:56 AM »

Some Tory MP is just now shouting "You're a bully!" to Bercow.
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,222
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #481 on: September 09, 2019, 11:17:36 AM »

Some Tory MP is just now shouting "You're a bully!" to Bercow.

Sounds like Bercow needs to restore ORRRDDEER.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,169
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #482 on: September 09, 2019, 12:08:12 PM »

John Bercow, the HoC Speaker, is to stand down (as an MP also) by the end of the year.

(in other words at the next GE assuming, as is now very likely, there is one before then)

When taking over in summer 2009, he said he would not do more than a decade.

Nooooooooooooooooooo Cry Cry Cry
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #483 on: September 09, 2019, 12:10:07 PM »

After he stoods down, we must ask John Bercow to become a moderator on the Atlas.
Logged
cp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,612
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #484 on: September 09, 2019, 12:35:59 PM »

I think the most likely outcome is that Boris simply chooses to ignore the Benn Act. This is blatantly illegal, of course, but would anything really happen to him?

He could be impeached from office by a vote of parliament, expelled from parliament, and/or have a vote of no confidence passed against his government.

Also, if Johnson (or anyone, really) violated the Benn Act they could face up to 15 years in prison and be liable for civil penalties for any damages incurred as a result of their crime. Civil penalties could also apply to anyone found to have conspired to aid Johnson in his violation of the law - that includes MPs and special advisers working in Downing Street.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,129
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #485 on: September 09, 2019, 12:44:57 PM »

I think the most likely outcome is that Boris simply chooses to ignore the Benn Act. This is blatantly illegal, of course, but would anything really happen to him?

He could be impeached from office by a vote of parliament, expelled from parliament, and/or have a vote of no confidence passed against his government.

Also, if Johnson (or anyone, really) violated the Benn Act they could face up to 15 years in prison and be liable for civil penalties for any damages incurred as a result of their crime. Civil penalties could also apply to anyone found to have conspired to aid Johnson in his violation of the law - that includes MPs and special advisers working in Downing Street.
Oh I'm aware that there are potential consequences for Johnson's inaction. My concern is, will those consequences materialize?

I suppose were Johnson to ignore the Benn Act, the opposition would call a vote of no confidence. But could they form a government in time? You'd think that the terrible prospect of a 'no deal' Brexit would bring them together, but I have my doubts.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #486 on: September 09, 2019, 12:48:37 PM »

My concern is, will those consequences materialize?

If this all amounted to active law-breaking, then, yes. The British political system has its problems, but a lack of a strong State/government distinction is not one of them.
Logged
cp
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,612
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #487 on: September 09, 2019, 01:22:28 PM »

My concern is, will those consequences materialize?

If this all amounted to active law-breaking, then, yes. The British political system has its problems, but a lack of a strong State/government distinction is not one of them.

Agreed. Don't get me wrong it would be the ugliest parliamentary confrontation, arguably constitutional crisis, since Home Rule in 1914 - and this time without a World War to intervene and stop it (well, I hope!) - but Johnson would be unable to sustain a government if he was literally under arrest. Even most pro-No Deal MPs in the Tory Party won't stand for deliberately breaking the law, especially when they could be considered accessories to it.
Logged
Devout Centrist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,129
United States


Political Matrix
E: -99.99, S: -99.99

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #488 on: September 09, 2019, 01:30:54 PM »

My concern is, will those consequences materialize?

If this all amounted to active law-breaking, then, yes. The British political system has its problems, but a lack of a strong State/government distinction is not one of them.
Fair enough. Are there any other tactics that Johnson is exploring?
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,675
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #489 on: September 09, 2019, 01:36:33 PM »

Another Grieve motion just passed, ordering a number of prominent government officials and advisers (including invincible masterful strategist Dominic Cummings) to disclose to the House "all correspondence and other communications" since July 23rd regarding the Prorogation, and ordering ministers to publish government documents regarding Operation Yellowhammer (No-Deal preparations) submitted to the Cabinet.

The government is most unwilling to comply despite the motion meaning the Queen will formally make the request, which should be interesting to watch.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #490 on: September 09, 2019, 01:37:55 PM »

311-302. That's five defeats.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,675
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #491 on: September 09, 2019, 01:54:18 PM »

The hell is the Government doing?

Corbyn put a motion regarding the rule of law and whether the Government would abide by the Benn bill, and no one on the frontbench rose to officially respond. Peter Bone (!) is responding for the government because - literally - no minister would.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,700
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #492 on: September 09, 2019, 02:17:47 PM »

The hell is the Government doing?

Corbyn put a motion regarding the rule of law and whether the Government would abide by the Benn bill, and no one on the frontbench rose to officially respond. Peter Bone (!) is responding for the government because - literally - no minister would.

Is that his porn name?
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #493 on: September 09, 2019, 02:43:45 PM »
« Edited: September 09, 2019, 03:09:40 PM by Pandaguineapig »

Looks like the Hobbit in the speaker's chair would rather retire to the shire than risk losing his seat in the election
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #494 on: September 09, 2019, 03:39:20 PM »
« Edited: September 09, 2019, 03:44:00 PM by Sen. tack50 (Lab-Lincoln) »

Looks like the midget in the speaker's chair would rather retire to the shire than risk losing his seat in the election

The speaker's seat generally goes uncontested, at least by the major parties. I guess the Brexit party would contest it, but there's no way Bercow would have lost his seat if he went for reelection

Also, fun fact: Buckingham voted remain. Not by a particularly large margin (48% Leave), but voted remain nontheless.
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #495 on: September 09, 2019, 04:02:51 PM »

Looks like the midget in the speaker's chair would rather retire to the shire than risk losing his seat in the election

The speaker's seat generally goes uncontested, at least by the major parties. I guess the Brexit party would contest it, but there's no way Bercow would have lost his seat if he went for reelection

Also, fun fact: Buckingham voted remain. Not by a particularly large margin (48% Leave), but voted remain nontheless.
The Tories announced that they would challenge him for breaking his neutrality. His seat is a remain marginal but it is ancestrally Tory
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #496 on: September 09, 2019, 04:09:25 PM »

Looks like the midget in the speaker's chair would rather retire to the shire than risk losing his seat in the election

The speaker's seat generally goes uncontested, at least by the major parties. I guess the Brexit party would contest it, but there's no way Bercow would have lost his seat if he went for reelection

Also, fun fact: Buckingham voted remain. Not by a particularly large margin (48% Leave), but voted remain nontheless.
The Tories announced that they would challenge him for breaking his neutrality. His seat is a remain marginal but it is ancestrally Tory

Even so, it's easy to see Bercow holding on to the seat running as speaker. It's an ancestrally Tory seat, but they would lose a bit of their vote to the Brexit party, while the opposition would be unified (no remain party would contest it; not Labour, not the LDs, not the Greens).

It would be close, but I imagine Bercow wins with a percentage in the 40s. Of course, with Bercow out it's now safe Tory.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #497 on: September 09, 2019, 04:34:00 PM »

It seems LDEM will take the position of revoking Article 50. If so then there will be no LAB-LDEM remain alliance in the upcoming election.  Question is will these be a de facto if not de jure CON-BXP leave alliance. 
Logged
Conservatopia
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,034
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 0.72, S: 8.60

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #498 on: September 09, 2019, 04:49:15 PM »

Wow. Did anyone see Ian Austin?  He's been wanting to get that off his chest for a long time...
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #499 on: September 09, 2019, 05:44:45 PM »

Looks like the Hobbit in the speaker's chair would rather retire to the shire than risk losing his seat in the election

I'll give you C- for the effort.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 ... 47  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 13 queries.