Do you support Twitter banning the Krassenstein brothers?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

No!

The most wrong and unjust thing Twitter has ever done.

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

They were annoying, but harmless, especially in comparison to a solid amount of Twits who haven't been banned.

[Rules for me, but not for thee]

LOL at least the shoe is on the other foot now.

[Some of My Best Friends Are Gay]

If they broke the rules, then yes.


Of course there are plenty of people who are more worthy of being banned than them, but those people being banned won't trigger you like these two being banned does, so yeah.

[Goldwater]

Who?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Who?

These two guys who tweeted more than 20 times a day every day and did nothing but rave about how terrible Trump is.

[fhtagn]

Personally - I don't really care.

However, the fact that it's triggering you this much made me vote yes.

[Some of My Best Friends Are Gay]

Who?

These two guys who tweeted more than 20 times a day every day and did nothing but rave about how terrible Trump is.

Why do you keep bringing up how often they tweeted? is having no life outside of the internet cool now?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Who?

These two guys who tweeted more than 20 times a day every day and did nothing but rave about how terrible Trump is.

Why do you keep bringing up how often they tweeted? is having no life outside of the internet cool now?

It shows how important and dedicated they are. Tweeting "Trump sucks!" once a day isn't notable.

[Goldwater]

Who?

These two guys who tweeted more than 20 times a day every day and did nothing but rave about how terrible Trump is.

Why do you keep bringing up how often they tweeted? is having no life outside of the internet cool now?

It shows how important and dedicated they are. Tweeting "Trump sucks!" once a day isn't notable.

But tweeting it 20 times a day is "important" somehow?

[James Monroe]

No, no, no, no, NO!!


Let's banned the Drump that constantly tweets while being president.

[dead0man]

There is not enough info at this time.  They can ban whoever they want, of course.  On the other hand, they shouldn't ban anybody, especially if it's just for what they're saying (obviously that's not the case here as Twitter politics clearly aligns very well with the politics of these two).


It is, as others have noted, very funny watching this happen to the people who normally cheerlead for Twitter bans for political reasons.  Thank you for that.


edit-also, if you support jailing members of the press that release info that embarrasses politicians on your side (Assange) and are freaking out over this, you're a sh**tty person

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Who?

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

No. It was irritating to see their painfully unfunny responses directly below every Trump tweet but I just blocked them and that was that. I don't see any real need to ban them.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Who?

These two guys who tweeted more than 20 times a day every day and did nothing but rave about how terrible Trump is.

Why do you keep bringing up how often they tweeted? is having no life outside of the internet cool now?

It shows how important and dedicated they are. Tweeting "Trump sucks!" once a day isn't notable.

But tweeting it 20 times a day is "important" somehow?

Their burns were f[inks]ing SICK

[DavidB.]

No, free speech in the digital part of the public space is essential. But as long as Twitter keeps banning people who are a lot better, I don't mind them banning the Krassensteins at all. Two of the first people I muted.

[Wazza [INACTIVE]]

The Krassenstein Brothers are annoying HP's, but I am completely against this. Platforms such as twitter and youtube should foster free speech rather than pursuing these dumb censorship campaigns which have ruined the internet.