Governor elected in 2018 likely to lose in 2022
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:24:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Governor elected in 2018 likely to lose in 2022
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: US State Governor elected in 2018 most likely to lose in 4 years ?
#1
WI Governor Tony Evers (D)
 
#2
NV Governor Steve Sisolak (D)
 
#3
MI Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 59

Author Topic: Governor elected in 2018 likely to lose in 2022  (Read 1476 times)
LoneStarDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 10, 2019, 03:23:05 PM »

Which one of the Dem Governor's do you see going down in 2022 ?
Logged
Skunk
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -9.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2019, 03:29:40 PM »

Definitely Evers. Followed by Whitmer then Sisolak.
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2019, 04:15:15 PM »

Evers probably needs 2022 to be a Trump midterm in order to win reelection. Agree with the consensus here (Evers>Whitmer>Sisolak).
Just curious, what would your 2022 gubernatorial map look like?
Logged
QAnonKelly
dotard
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,995


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.50

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2019, 04:50:22 PM »

Yo where's that dickhead Kemp?
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,507
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2019, 04:51:28 PM »


391 West Paces Ferry Road NW, Atlanta, GA
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,281
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2019, 05:02:12 PM »

I wouldn't say Evers is done in a Democratic midterm, but he'd be the most vulnerable of the three, assuming Whitmer remains at least moderately popular. I could see Kelly having a harder time than Evers, though, depending on her approval rating.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,374
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2019, 05:06:21 PM »

Whitmer should be fine. She won’t win re-election in a Blanchard 1986 landslide, but she’ll likely gain support by 2022. My prediction that she succeeds Debbie Stabenow in 2024 still stands though.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2019, 05:32:10 PM »

Evers probably needs 2022 to be a Trump midterm in order to win reelection. Agree with the consensus here (Evers>Whitmer>Sisolak).
Just curious, what would your 2022 gubernatorial map look like?

Democratic president:



Trump midterm:



This is assuming that Baker doesn’t run again in 2022 and Reynolds runs for Senate. VT and NH are contingent on 2020 results.
Logged
Ilhan Apologist
Glowfish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,157


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2019, 07:08:09 PM »

Evers probably needs 2022 to be a Trump midterm in order to win reelection. Agree with the consensus here (Evers>Whitmer>Sisolak).
Just curious, what would your 2022 gubernatorial map look like?

Democratic president:



Trump midterm:



This is assuming that Baker doesn’t run again in 2022 and Reynolds runs for Senate. VT and NH are contingent on 2020 results.

Surprised by what you put for Iowa tbh
Logged
LoneStarDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2019, 08:45:16 PM »

IndyRep, how on Earth are Idaho, Nebraska, and Oklahoma only "Likely" R in a Trump midterm, South Dakota and South Carolina are only Lean R, Colorado and Connecticut (unpooular Dem governors) Safe D even in a Democrat midterm, and Rhode Island and Maine tossups in a Democrat midterm lol. You predicted Rhode Island and Maine were tossups Republicans had a great chance of winning while Connecticut was Safe D and unwinnable for them and yet Rhode Island was a Democratic blowout, Maine comfortably went D, but Connecticut only barely so.

Polis got unpopular up there in CO quickly ?
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 10, 2019, 09:16:16 PM »

Tony Evers and Brian Kemp.

Let them continue to underestimate us. I fully expect 2022 to be the equivalent of the shockwave that ran through Georgia when Perdue ended a century of Democratic control at the Capitol. It's going to be amazing.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,276
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 11, 2019, 02:07:53 AM »

@Politician: Uh, is there any evidence whatsoever that Polis and Lamont are unpopular? I get that I’m arguing with someone who thinks the 2012 map can easily be replicated by the Democratic nominee in 2020, but I’m reserving the "safe" category for races where there’s no feasible path for the opposition party barring some unforeseen/unpredictable dead girl/live boy circumstances. And yeah, that includes CT, which I guess to me is what KY is to xingkerui, IceSpear, and Mizzouian, since I really don’t buy that Lamont could actually lose. Sure, he underperformed in 2018, but that doesn’t mean that 2022 will be a lot easier for Republicans now that Lamont is the incumbent and their bench has been decimated. CT and CO withstood GOP waves in 2010 and 2014, there’s no reason to believe that 2022 would be any different with a Democrat in the White House. RI and ME are more winnable for Republicans for a variety of reasons (RI will be an open seat, ME is a perpetually competitive state that’s trending Republican, Mills doesn’t strike me as someone who can generate a lot of crossover appeal, RI is a tough state for Republicans to win but its demographics arguably make it more winnable than CT, etc), but you’re right that Raimondo’s landslide win was a bad sign for the RI GOP, and you could certainly make a case for rating it Lean D as well. Republicans are favored in ID, NE, and OK, but the right Democrat could at least make those states competitive in a KS-type situation. SD should be obvious as Noem underperformed badly in 2018, and SC has a high Democratic floor and appears to be trending Democratic a little. McMaster only won by 8 points in 2018 and Haley almost lost her first race in a GOP wave year.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,761


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2019, 02:17:05 AM »

Evers
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,919
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2019, 09:17:45 AM »

Evers. I think Laura Kelly is more likely to get reelected, let alone Whitmer and Sisolak. Both of them should be fine.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,715
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2019, 01:48:26 PM »

Evers will likely win; however, Sisolak is the most vulnerable, due to GOP dominance in NV gov races. But, all three can win
Logged
LoneStarDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2019, 04:34:04 PM »

Evers will likely win; however, Sisolak is the most vulnerable, due to GOP dominance in NV gov races. But, all three can win

The pressure will be on Whitmer to get those damn roads fixed in MI.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,767


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2019, 08:03:41 PM »

Whitmer should be fine. She won’t win re-election in a Blanchard 1986 landslide, but she’ll likely gain support by 2022. My prediction that she succeeds Debbie Stabenow in 2024 still stands though.

Agreed
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,767


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2019, 08:04:01 PM »

Evers
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 11, 2019, 08:11:39 PM »

Evers of these, but Lamont is an underrated pick here.
Logged
😥
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,504
Ukraine
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2019, 01:00:23 AM »

WI-NV-MI
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,919
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 12, 2019, 05:00:21 AM »

Evers of these, but Lamont is an underrated pick here.

I've heard he might not seek reelection and he's indicated this a couple of times as far as I remember. But if he runs, he should be fine. If not, Susan Bysiewicz would be a decent successor.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 12, 2019, 08:46:05 AM »

We won't know between Evers and Whitmer until 2021, but it's likely one of them out of these three.
Logged
LoneStarDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 12, 2019, 12:25:29 PM »

Evers of these, but Lamont is an underrated pick here.

I've heard he might not seek reelection and he's indicated this a couple of times as far as I remember. But if he runs, he should be fine. If not, Susan Bysiewicz would be a decent successor.

Lamont cannot handle the heat in Hartford eh ?
Logged
LoneStarDem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 13, 2019, 03:50:26 AM »

The worst governor Evers. (pun intended)

I'm assuming he's having a horrible legislative session despite winning 4 consecutive statewide elections ?
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2019, 02:32:08 PM »

Evers >>>>>>>>> Whitmer > Sisolak
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 13 queries.