Why was Obamas position in Ohio in 2012 considered so strong (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 12:57:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Obamas position in Ohio in 2012 considered so strong (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Obamas position in Ohio in 2012 considered so strong  (Read 1133 times)
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,088
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

« on: April 10, 2019, 04:00:24 AM »

There was likely something showing up in various internal polls and data sources that suggested OH was - in relative terms - moving much less against Obama than many other states. WI and MI swung 7 points to Romney, NV swung 6, PA and NH swung 5, & CO swung 4. In the end, OH only swung 1.5 points to Romney, making it the swing state with the smallest losses margin-wise for Obama when compared to 2008.

Chances are they saw OH as the true bellwether: by being in a good position there, it indicated that the remaining swing states would hold. By being in a bad position, the game was already lost.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.