My Current Take On The 2006 Senate Races...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:07:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  My Current Take On The 2006 Senate Races...
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: My Current Take On The 2006 Senate Races...  (Read 3707 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2005, 10:28:41 PM »

Polls have shown Democrats leading in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Ohio and Minnesota.



He has PA as lean Dem and aside from one poll (I think it was just one), the McCaskill has been down in MO.
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2005, 10:32:22 PM »

The two Rasmussen polls in the MO race had the race tied at 46-46 and the one that just came out had McCaskill up 47-45.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2005, 10:33:01 PM »

The two Rasmussen polls in the MO race had the race tied at 46-46 and the one that just came out had McCaskill up 47-45.

Again, only one had her leading. Thanks for restating my point, Scoonie.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2005, 10:39:52 PM »

MO and OH I would probably both put at Toss-up (leaning Dem).

I should do a Senate review when I get my laptop back.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 13, 2005, 10:47:33 PM »

Ohio was tough. Taking it from this second, I'd say whoever the Dems get is in a nice place. If it's Brown, they can kiss disgruntled Republicans goodbye. If it's Hackett, they'll have to run the campaign on Bush sucks/GOP sucks because Hackett has only that. Missouri is lean Republican because of Talent's money lead and incumbency. If it gets to May and McCaskill is still up and the money race is tied, then it may be tossup/lean Democrat.
Logged
Defarge
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,588


Political Matrix
E: -3.13, S: -0.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2005, 10:51:50 PM »

Since when did MO and MT become competitive?
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2005, 10:56:33 PM »

When Bush started sucking ass in the polls.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2005, 11:08:31 PM »


I do not really think Burns (R-MT) is in jeopardy.  He was back when his approval ratings were mediocre, but now that he's net positive, the late tidal wave washing the Montana GOP away will probably not go high enough to knock him off.  At this point, though, the race is unclear - his opponents all have name recognition below 20%, although they have some nice pedigrees, with one representing the conservative Choteau County.

Talent (R-MO) is in trouble, on the other hand.  His opponent, State Auditor Claire McCaskill, is widely respected and has much higher approval ratings, although Talent's are still positive.  Recent polls show the race tied or McCaskill slightly up.  It should be a very interesting one.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 10 queries.