House votes against lowering voting age to 16 for federal elections
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:03:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  House votes against lowering voting age to 16 for federal elections
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: House votes against lowering voting age to 16 for federal elections  (Read 719 times)
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,984
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 07, 2019, 06:50:07 PM »

Proposed as an Amendment to HR 1, it failed 126-305. The following members of the Democratic Leadership Team voted No - Hoyer, Jeffries, Bustos, Torres, Matsui, Perlmutter, Scanlon, Morelle. Burgess was the only Republican to vote Yes.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2019/roll111.xml
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,438


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2019, 06:51:50 PM »

Good
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2019, 06:56:08 PM »

Thank goodness.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2019, 07:00:03 PM »

If you're not old enough to smoke, drink alcohol, gamble, buy a gun or enter into contracts because you're "too immature", why should you be able to vote?

You're either an adult or you're not. The only consistent thing would be to lower the age for all of those things to 16 - or keep things as is. You need to be 21 to drink, and most states are going the opposite way on smoking and gun buying - raising the age to 21.
Logged
user12345
wifikitten
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,135
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2019, 07:06:44 PM »

Surprising to see so many vote yes on this.
Logged
OneJ
OneJ_
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,833
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 07, 2019, 07:24:28 PM »

If you're not old enough to smoke, drink alcohol, gamble, buy a gun or enter into contracts because you're "too immature", why should you be able to vote?

You're either an adult or you're not. The only consistent thing would be to lower the age for all of those things to 16 - or keep things as is. You need to be 21 to drink, and most states are going the opposite way on smoking and gun buying - raising the age to 21.

I guess I’ll agree to disagree on this. The problem with this argument is that acts such as smoking, drinking, etc. affect people’s health and those acts will affect teens the most. Voting at at an age as young as 16 does not pose a health risk. There are even benefits for 16 and 17 year olds voting. In my opinion, this would help prepare young people for the future.
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2019, 08:16:36 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,766


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2019, 08:17:33 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 07, 2019, 08:21:59 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,766


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 07, 2019, 08:22:28 PM »

I guess more realistically, 15 5/6 year old threshold would suffice since it gives them completely equal say on that level when it comes to the House of Representatives level.

Actually, after thinking it through, I have changed my mind and I think that 15 5/6 makes way more sense than 11 5/6, so the threshold should be 15 5/6.
Logged
America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS
Solid4096
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,766


Political Matrix
E: -8.88, S: -8.51

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 07, 2019, 08:23:53 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?

They would no longer be minors while some of the politicians elected in elections they never had a chance to vote in were still serving terms from said elections.

Though after thinking about it, a 15 5/6 threshold does make more sense and it still completely works when it comes to the House of Representatives.
Logged
Yellowhammer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,695
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2019, 08:28:03 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?

They would no longer be minors while some of the politicians elected in elections they never had a chance to vote in were still serving terms from said elections.

Though after thinking about it, a 15 5/6 threshold does make more sense and it still completely works when it comes to the House of Representatives.

Most adults aren't informed enough to be voting, not to mention teenagers. If anything, the voting age needs to be raised; perhaps drastically.
Logged
Bismarck
Chancellor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,383


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2019, 08:35:36 PM »

I don’t see how lowering the voting age would help anything. It’s a solution in search of a problem. 18 may be arbitrary but you have to draw the line somewhere and the legal age of adulthood when people reach the age when they graduate high school seems appropriate.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,540
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2019, 08:40:13 PM »

More young people voting benefits Democrats, so every Democrat who voted against this is a cuck.  Democrats in non-competitive districts especially have no excuse.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,671
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2019, 09:16:50 PM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?

How the world are you under the impression that people under 18 don't pay taxes???
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2019, 09:44:29 PM »

Unfortunate, but nice to see so many Aye votes. I wouldn't be shocked to see this start to happen on the state level.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,869
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2019, 11:30:22 PM »

They pay taxes, they drive on public roads, they have healthcare needs, many are parents, and there is no way you can convince me 16 year olds (at least the ones who would take the time to go and vote) have a fundamentally worse grasp of politics than someone who is 100+ years old.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,512
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2019, 11:30:57 PM »

Surprising to see so many vote yes on this.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,425
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2019, 11:36:01 PM »

Good,

I don’t think many people even over 20 are poltically informed and just about every 16 and 17 year old I know is a very liberal Democrat, and they really cannot explain why they have that position and finds my ideas intolerable.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,869
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2019, 11:44:39 PM »

Good,

I don’t think many people even over 20 are poltically informed and just about every 16 and 17 year old I know is a very liberal Democrat, and they really cannot explain why they have that position and finds my ideas intolerable.

Since when have we required people know anything about politics before they can vote? I actually think it would be an interesting system to try out that you could register to vote at any age before 18 if you can pass a basic civics course, kind of like how we do drivers' ed. In the meantime, though, if we're going to cut people off for being young idiots, maybe we should also cut off the olds who think they just won $1,000,000 and should click here to claim their prize!
Logged
Coastal Elitist
Tea Party Hater
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,252
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: 2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 07, 2019, 11:50:40 PM »

They pay taxes, they drive on public roads, they have healthcare needs, many are parents, and there is no way you can convince me 16 year olds (at least the ones who would take the time to go and vote) have a fundamentally worse grasp of politics than someone who is 100+ years old.
Do you actually know any 16 year olds who pay taxes? Like I had a summer job when I was 16, but I didn't make enough to pay taxes because there is a certain threshold you have to reach otherwise you pay nothing. I'm pretty sure this is the case for most if not all 16 year olds. Since they have to go to school and can't work that much.

Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,550


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 07, 2019, 11:53:19 PM »

I notice nobody has directly challenged Yellowhammer's implicit premise that the only reason someone could have a legitimate interest in the actions of the federal government is that they pay taxes, despite the fact that that premise is complete poppycock.
Logged
Cold War Liberal
KennedyWannabe99
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,284
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -6.53

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2019, 12:10:56 AM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?
Not remotely true, I’ve been a taxpayer almost four years longer than I’ve been a voter (got my first job just after I turned 15 and was able to vote for the first time in a federal general election a month before my 19th birthday). Additionally, thanks to the motor voter law, I’ve been registered to vote since September 2015 but only legally allowed to exercise the franchise in elections following December 22, 2017.

If you’re legally mature enough to drive yourself to the polls, join the workforce, pay your taxes, and register to vote, why aren’t you mature enough to cast a ballot?
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,869
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 08, 2019, 12:15:13 AM »

They pay taxes, they drive on public roads, they have healthcare needs, many are parents, and there is no way you can convince me 16 year olds (at least the ones who would take the time to go and vote) have a fundamentally worse grasp of politics than someone who is 100+ years old.
Do you actually know any 16 year olds who pay taxes? Like I had a summer job when I was 16, but I didn't make enough to pay taxes because there is a certain threshold you have to reach otherwise you pay nothing. I'm pretty sure this is the case for most if not all 16 year olds. Since they have to go to school and can't work that much.

Well, I'm 25 and don't hang out with that many 16 year olds, so the answer is no. However, I actually did have to pay taxes when I was 16. For one of my birthdays when I was a kid, my grandma bought me some stock in a local startup called "Amazon.com." When I was 16, I sold that stock to buy my first car in high school, and I had to pay capital gains tax on that stock. Fun fact: had I not sold that stock to buy that car, it would today be worth upwards of $60,000. But I'm not bitter about it, I promise........

That's kind of an exceptional case, but I can guarantee that, even if most teens don't pay income tax, many do. That's not to mention sales tax, license tabs, or fuel tax.

And again, if we're going off of "do they pay taxes?" as a qualification to vote:

Logged
JA
Jacobin American
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,955
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 08, 2019, 12:24:22 AM »

If you are going to be a legal adult before the winners of the next election are set to take office, you should be able to vote in the current election.

In other words, if an election is going to have an effect on ongoing political situations at points in time when you are a legal adult, you ought to have a say in the process.

The minimum voting age should be about 11 and 5/6ths based on this and the fact that the US Senate uses 6 year terms that start about 2 months after the election, and that office is the office with the longest terms.

Since elections that occur after I'm dead will affect my descendants or my estate, shouldn't I then be able to vote posthumously?

I mean, those elections would not affect you personally so...

Minors are not taxpayers, so how exactly would they be directly affected in the time between when they are 11 and 18?

They would no longer be minors while some of the politicians elected in elections they never had a chance to vote in were still serving terms from said elections.

Though after thinking about it, a 15 5/6 threshold does make more sense and it still completely works when it comes to the House of Representatives.

Most adults aren't informed enough to be voting, not to mention teenagers. If anything, the voting age needs to be raised; perhaps drastically.

To be fair, the average 16yo American is probably more informed and less of a political edgelord than you. I wouldn't be arguing against voting rights on the basis of how informed a person is if I was you, my man.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 10 queries.