Oh man, would that be awesome?
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002473.htmlBorn to run: Springsteen for U.S. Senate from N.J.
The Democrats in New Jersey have a big problem. Oh sure, they've been winning elections and all -- Corzine for governor, Corzine for Senate, McGreevey, Lautenberg, Kerry, Gore, Clinton, etc., etc. And there's a couple of good reasons why the Garden State is bluer than blue.
For one thing, it's a state where the voters are a lot better and a lot smarter than the politicians foisted upon them -- rock solid on social and environmental issues, with a heck of an independent streak. And luckily for the Democrats, the GOP has been throwing out a string of weak and mediocre candidates for the last 15 years.
But now the Democrats' streak of luck is about to run out. Corzine's first decision when he takes office in Trenton in January is a doozy -- picking the U.S. senator who will replace him in Washington until after the next election in November 2006. And his so-called "choices" reek of political hackery at its worst -- even by Jersey standards.
North Jersey U.S. Rep. Robert Menendez once seemed the obvious choice, and God knows the Dems need to promote a new generation of Latino leaders. But now Menendez is bogged down down in predictable machine politics and scandal. Across the river from us here in Philly, Rob Andrews is an unexciting career politician from a county (Camden) that's synonymous with corruption. Acting governor Richard Codey is probably the best name bandied about -- but even Codey is an almost sure loser next November to the up-and-coming golden boy of Garden State politics with an unbeatable family name, Republican Tom Kean Jr.
In fact, you could say that Corzine's choice is like a highway jammed with broken heroes on a last-chance power drive.
The Democrats need to hold New Jersey in 2006 to have any chance of regaining control of the Senate in 2007, and without that, there's not much hope for cleaning up the fiasco of the last six years in Washington. But we feel strongly that their only hope against Kean Jr. is to turn to someone from outside the the bland political arena.
New Jersey's new senator should be a person who has demonstrated over a lifetime a commitment to social causes, of not just paying lip service to helping those in need but taking action.
Corzine should chose a person who is fearless about advocating causes that are unpopular but just -- willing to speak out in favor of the Dixie Chicks and free speech on the eve of the Iraq war, and willing to criticize police brutality even when it alienates some longtime supporters.
In January, Corzine will have the option of chosing someone whose compassion for the victims and survivors of 9/11 is unparalleled, yet who realized the insanity of the Iraq war from Day One, and was not afraid to risk his considerable reputation in opposing it.
It's OK if the next senator is a millionaire -- that seems to be some kind of requirement in New Jersey, for some reason -- but he should be a self-made one, someone who can speak to blue-collar voters and can relate to minorities, in spite of his own personal success.
The Democrats need someone with a name even more magical to New Jersey voters than Kean, who would draw thousands of normally disaffected and alienated voters out to the polls. An outsider who would shake up a corrupt and contented New Jersey Democratic Party and shake up folks on Capital Hill, as well.
Jon Corzine needs to appoint Bruce Springsteen to the United States Senate.
Crazy? Not any crazier than a violent action-flick actor from Austria with steroid use and groping allegations who can't even properly pronounce the name of his home state getting elected as its governor (a job with a lot more responsibility than a senator, by the way). Or not any crazier than electing a retired pro wrestler to the statehouse. And not any crazier than another rock star from across the pond coming within an eyelash of the Nobel Peace Prize.
We've already war-gamed it all out, and we just don't see too much downside risk should Sen. Springsteen (don't you love it?) seek a full term a year from now. We do have a difficult time imagining him in a jacket and tie. And it's not a slam dunk -- there would certainly be a sizable minority who would recoil at the idea of sending a rock star to the Senate, but we believe they'd be outnumbered by first-time voters coming out in support of the Boss.
Dirt in his past? Less than most politicians, let alone rock stars. In fact, arguably there's none. In fact, Sprngsteen claims to have not used drugs, and if he did experiment, that would place him in the company of George W. Bush, John Kerry, Al Gore, John Edwards, etc., etc., etc. His big "mistake" in life was realizing he'd married the wrong woman, divorcing amicably, and raising a family, as a devoted dad, with the true love of his life. Not really much of a mistake.
We should note here that this is not a completely novel idea. In 1992, a group of Ross Perot accolytes urged Springsteen to run for the Senate as an outsider. The Boss laughed it off -- but a lot has changed in the last 13 years. Back then, Springsteen was a musical artist wary of being co-opted by any politician.
But in 2004, he was one of handful of folks who -- realizing the threat posed by four more years of Bush to the country he loves -- stepped up to the plate, or, as he might say, tried to make it on a stand. And now, at age 56, with his musical legacy established and his own kids growing up, he might be convinced to stake out a new direction, for the good of the U.S.A. (He'd certainly be set for rope-line music!)
Notice we've kept the cheesy song lyric puns to a minimum here. That's because we're very serious about this -- frankly, we'd support Joe Piscopo if we thought it would take the Senate out of GOP clutches, but we think America would be proud of U.S. Sen. Bruce Springsteen (D-N.J.)
C'mon Bruce, this is our last chance.
Don't let the screen door slam.
