Why did Howard Phillips do so well in Hartford and Bridgeport, CT? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:54:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Howard Phillips do so well in Hartford and Bridgeport, CT? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Howard Phillips do so well in Hartford and Bridgeport, CT?  (Read 788 times)
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,039
United States


« on: February 09, 2019, 01:17:08 PM »

Hartford, CT
2000
Gore 21,445 (80.22%)
Bush 3,095 (11.58%)
Phillips 1,202 (4.50%)
Nader 818 (3.06%)
Buchanan 100 (0.37%)
Browne 73 (0.27%)

Could this be a clerical error? Hartford is the most Democratic city in Connecticut so a Constitution candidate winning 4.50 percent of the vote there should raise some eyebrows, but this is what is reported on the Secretary of State's website and in the 2000 Statement of the Vote.

Bridgeport, CT
2000
Gore 24,303 (72.68%)
Bush 7,406 (22.15%)
Nader 865 (2.59%)
Phillips 715 (2.14%)
Buchanan 81 (0.24%)
Browne 70 (0.21%)

Again, 2.14 percent is kind of a high for a far right-wing candidate to get in a heavily Democratic city in a reliably blue/Atlas red state.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.