Tulsi Gabbard v.s Donald Trump v.s Jill Stein how do you vote?

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

reluctantly Gabbard, then weep

[SWE]

Stein

[Intell]

Stein

[Lourdes]

Stein

[Starry Eyed Jagaloon]

Bloomberg

[YE]

Write in Bernie Sanders or Sherrod Brown.

[Skunk]

Gabbard.

[OctoCube]

Lean Gabbard, though I'd support Trump compared to most of the Democratic field.

[F. Joe Haydn]

Write in Bernie Sanders or Sherrod Brown.

[Frenchrepublican]

Gabbard is a socialist who supports Assad so of course I would vote Trump.

[😥]

w/i Joe Biden or w/i Sherrod Brown

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Safe Gabbard.

Gabbard is a socialist who supports Assad so of course I would vote Trump.

Well if people "supported" Assad in the first place, maybe there wouldn't have been a disastreous civil war in Syria, and maybe there wouldn't be a vacuum that allow terrorist groups to gain power and take power. I don't think a country has any business to do in a different country. Supporting someone goes a bit too far, but being anti-Assad is risky as well, especially if you don't have a plan to do of what next to Assad, like Trump already retreated his troops in Syria at a moment where the country is still very unstable. The intervention might've done more evil to the country, than good. We apparent learnt nothing to what good our invasions have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The war on terrorism and the quest to overthrow dictators has only made things worse in every one of those countries.

[Lechasseur]

Safe Gabbard.

Gabbard is a socialist who supports Assad so of course I would vote Trump.

Well if people "supported" Assad in the first place, maybe there wouldn't have been a disastreous civil war in Syria, and maybe there wouldn't be a vacuum that allow terrorist groups to gain power and take power. I don't think a country has any business to do in a different country. Supporting someone goes a bit too far, but being anti-Assad is risky as well, especially if you don't have a plan to do of what next to Assad, like Trump already retreated his troops in Syria at a moment where the country is still very unstable. The intervention might've done more evil to the country, than good. We apparent learnt nothing to what good our invasions have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The war on terrorism and the quest to overthrow dictators has only made things worse in every one of those countries.

We had no choice but to invade Afghanistan, but otherwise I agree

[Frenchrepublican]

Safe Gabbard.

Gabbard is a socialist who supports Assad so of course I would vote Trump.

Well if people "supported" Assad in the first place, maybe there wouldn't have been a disastreous civil war in Syria, and maybe there wouldn't be a vacuum that allow terrorist groups to gain power and take power. I don't think a country has any business to do in a different country. Supporting someone goes a bit too far, but being anti-Assad is risky as well, especially if you don't have a plan to do of what next to Assad, like Trump already retreated his troops in Syria at a moment where the country is still very unstable. The intervention might've done more evil to the country, than good. We apparent learnt nothing to what good our invasions have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The war on terrorism and the quest to overthrow dictators has only made things worse in every one of those countries.

I’m not a neoconservative who wants to invade every areas I see on a map but at the same time the Syria crisis is not limited to the Middle East, it’s a European crisis too, nearly three millions Syrians are now in Europe, they constitute a real threat for our institution and our culture, in Germany many of those Syrian refugees are causing a big increase in antisemitics acts, in France, last year 5500 Jews fled the country and went in Israel in part because of the violence perpetrated by muslims against them.
Assad is not only a criminal who has used chemical weapons against his people, he has also tried deliberately to clean Syria of some ethnical groups (especially sunnites) and the best way to do this is to force them to migrate in Europe
That’s the reason why European countries should have gone in Syria in order to stop migration flows

Concerning Afghanistan and Iraq, there is few doubts that those wars were ill prepared, Iraq should have been broken in parts, the west should have created an independent Kurdistan which would have been a friend of us. It’s clear that many people in the Bush administration didn’t know enough how complex and difficult Iraq would be to administrate, they clearly underestimated the threat represented by Iran which used the vacuum created by the end of the Saddam Hussein’s regime in order to expand its power

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Stein. She’s the only one with the chutzpah to take it to Big Internet.

[Reaganfan Democrat]

Tulsi!

[Mr. Smith]

Tulsi!

[Blair]

Safe Gabbard.

Gabbard is a socialist who supports Assad so of course I would vote Trump.

Well if people "supported" Assad in the first place, maybe there wouldn't have been a disastreous civil war in Syria, and maybe there wouldn't be a vacuum that allow terrorist groups to gain power and take power. I don't think a country has any business to do in a different country. Supporting someone goes a bit too far, but being anti-Assad is risky as well, especially if you don't have a plan to do of what next to Assad, like Trump already retreated his troops in Syria at a moment where the country is still very unstable. The intervention might've done more evil to the country, than good. We apparent learnt nothing to what good our invasions have done to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. The war on terrorism and the quest to overthrow dictators has only made things worse in every one of those countries.

Ugh. Assad killed, tortured and gassed his own population.

How can anyone on the left expect that Assad’s own citizens, who took to the streets in 2011, to support him after that?

I get being against military intervention (I opposed it in 2014) but god, I don’t understand how any self respecting leftist/social democrat etc can expect we should support, or praise Assad.

[TDAS04]

Gabbard reluctantly. 

[IceSpear]

Gabbard is the one semi-realistic Democratic nominee I'm not sure I'd be able to vote for. I probably would in the end solely because her opponent is Trump, but I'd probably need to bring about 5 clothespins and a barf bag to the polling place.

If I didn't vote for her though I'd do a write-in, definitely not Putin puppet Stein.

[RussFeingoldWasRobbed]

Jill Stein would endorse Tulsi lol

[Horus]

Gabbard reluctantly. 

[HillGoose]

God. No Gary Johnson even?

I guess Trump

[UlmerFudd]

God. No Gary Johnson even?

I guess Trump

[7,052,770]

Gabbard is awful but is by far the least bad of these 3.