O'Rourke and Castro on collision course in Texas
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:26:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  O'Rourke and Castro on collision course in Texas
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: O'Rourke and Castro on collision course in Texas  (Read 473 times)
Barack Oganja
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 497


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 27, 2018, 10:36:00 AM »

Still think Castro missed his chance by not running for a statewide office. Wouldn't be surprised if he didn't even make it to the Texas primary.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/27/orourke-julian-castro-collision-texas-election-1073720
Logged
Alabama_Indy10
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,319
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2018, 10:41:20 AM »

Castro lol
Logged
OctoCube
Rookie
**
Posts: 215
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.54, S: 1.42

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2018, 10:41:53 AM »

Any momentum that Castro could have garnered was destroyed by Robert. He might still run, but there's little reason to believe that he would be an actual contender.
Logged
Rookie Yinzer
RFKFan68
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2018, 11:17:00 AM »

Sure Jan.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,717
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2018, 11:32:08 AM »

I love how the clickbait headline "O'Rourke and Castro on collision course in Texas" is actually an article about how Texas Dem leaders do NOT think they'll nuke each other & that having two Texans run is good for Texas.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,361


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2018, 11:34:56 AM »

Damn that 93 percent known and favorability in texas democrats. Yeah its obvious but thats the 2nd biggest state and its on super tuesday.
Logged
YE
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,737


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2018, 11:39:28 AM »

I love how the clickbait headline "O'Rourke and Castro on collision course in Texas" is actually an article about how Texas Dem leaders do NOT think they'll nuke each other & that having two Texans run is good for Texas.
Logged
Barack Oganja
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 497


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2018, 12:12:35 PM »

Damn that 93 percent known and favorability in texas democrats. Yeah its obvious but thats the 2nd biggest state and its on super tuesday.
A win in Iowa (toughest part) plus respectable showings in NH, SC, and especially NV (maybe a win there as well) plus a strong super Tuesday (led by an overwhelming win in Texas) = Beto nominee
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,731
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2018, 01:07:31 PM »

Damn that 93 percent known and favorability in texas democrats. Yeah its obvious but thats the 2nd biggest state and its on super tuesday.
A win in Iowa (toughest part) plus respectable showings in NH, SC, and especially NV (maybe a win there as well) plus a strong super Tuesday (led by an overwhelming win in Texas) = Beto nominee

The flip side is that Kamala needs a win in the first four states (maybe SC) and California and then she would be very well positioned too.
Logged
Barack Oganja
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 497


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2018, 03:33:00 PM »

Damn that 93 percent known and favorability in texas democrats. Yeah its obvious but thats the 2nd biggest state and its on super tuesday.
A win in Iowa (toughest part) plus respectable showings in NH, SC, and especially NV (maybe a win there as well) plus a strong super Tuesday (led by an overwhelming win in Texas) = Beto nominee

The flip side is that Kamala needs a win in the first four states (maybe SC) and California and then she would be very well positioned too.
Yup, after super Tuesday I think it'll be Beto or Kamala vs Bernie or Biden
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,361


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2018, 04:40:02 PM »

if Beto can't win nevada (aka mini texas but reid machine makes it a blue state) he can't win the primaries.
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,157
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2018, 04:49:17 PM »
« Edited: December 27, 2018, 04:55:10 PM by Lakigigar »

Beto is going to do best in Nevada, and possibly Iowa, with a respectable showing in New Hampshire, and than win Texas by a large margin.
Kamala is going to do best in South-Carolina, with a respectable showing in Iowa and Nevada and than needs to win by a large margin California
Biden probably best placed in Iowa, followed by NH and SC and than win the smaller Super Sunday states. He's favoured when Kamala or Booker aren't candidates, as that would make him front-runner in SC.
Sanders best placed in NH, but could do well in Iowa and Nevada too, with at least respectable showings, but i think he has the toughest path of all four main contendors i've named here, as he has a tough map on Super Sunday.

Other candidates probably need one or multiple candidates above not running, and would have to gain momentum through debates or coverage to have a shot. Warren's path includes winning NH and doing well in Iowa and Nevada (same path as Bernie). Klobuchar needs to win Iowa probably (or an upset there). Gillibrand's path might be the same as Warren's one. Low-profile candidates need to win Iowa (like Ojeda) or end at least as a close 2nd or 3rd. Bloomberg needs NH too. Booker respectable showings in IA and NH, and needs to win SC. Less sure about Gabbard's path, but probably respectable showings or maybe upset in IA and NH, followed by a respectable showing in NV or win.
Logged
SCNCmod
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,271


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2018, 01:00:01 AM »

I think if Beto had not become a top prospect... Castro could have had a path to top 3 finish in the primary ... opening up a good shot at VP. 

But with Beto most likely in- Castro will not have a chance at getting much traction IMO.

I think one of the Castro Bros should run for Senator in 2020.  Esp is Beto were to get the nominee... having Beto & Castro on the ticket in Texas... plus another 2 years of Demo changes, and Cornyn supposedly being less popular than Cruz... could be a real opportunity.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.