2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:44:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42
Author Topic: 2020 AZ Senate Megathread: Kelly's Race to Lose  (Read 72378 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,618
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #925 on: October 08, 2020, 06:50:44 PM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

People were talking about her as a future Presidential contender in mid-2018 and she was still considered a strong candidate when appointed
Ah...spring 2018. So young and naive.
Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #926 on: October 08, 2020, 07:02:34 PM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

People were talking about her as a future Presidential contender in mid-2018 and she was still considered a strong candidate when appointed
Ah...spring 2018. So young and naive.

I recall it being a pretty common idea back when Ducey appointed her, immediately after being rejected by the voters, that she was DOA for the election this year.
Logged
Heebie Jeebie
jeb_arlo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,181
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #927 on: October 08, 2020, 07:06:07 PM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

I guess I wasn't following Arizona politics too closely back then.  Was AG Mark Brnovich ever considered for the seat?  He seems like he would have been a reasonable choice and probably a better candidate this year.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,349
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #928 on: October 08, 2020, 09:28:22 PM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

I guess I wasn't following Arizona politics too closely back then.  Was AG Mark Brnovich ever considered for the seat?  He seems like he would have been a reasonable choice and probably a better candidate this year.

No, McSally was still considered a future POTUS frontrunner so she got appointed.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #929 on: October 08, 2020, 09:29:47 PM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

I guess I wasn't following Arizona politics too closely back then.  Was AG Mark Brnovich ever considered for the seat?  He seems like he would have been a reasonable choice and probably a better candidate this year.

No, McSally was still considered a future POTUS frontrunner so she got appointed.

Amazing how quickly rising stars can burn out and start a dumpster fire
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,847
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #930 on: October 09, 2020, 06:17:17 AM »

There's a funny piece of revionism about the appointment being done for Ducey to win in 2022 but that ignores the fact that if he wanted a placeholder he could have appointed someone from his staff or some hack from the local party. He then easily could have either ran in the 2020 special election or in 2024 against Sinema.

Besides it wasn't assumed that McSally would lose this race; Kelly wasn't known to be running when she was appointed & although she ran a poor campaign it wasn't this awful. If he really wanted someone to lose the seat he could have appointed someone much worse like Ward

McSally was appointed because she was seen as the strongest choice & because they hoped she could use her Senate seat to save this race in 2020.
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #931 on: October 09, 2020, 10:21:28 AM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Arizona's GOP bench is surprisingly weak. The remaining members of the congressional delegation are all either far-right lunatics (Lesko, Biggs, Gosar) or are bogged down by ethics issues (Schweikert).

I think his logic was that she could take the L this year, allowing him to take the seat back in 2022. We'll see if his approval recovers by then.

People were talking about her as a future Presidential contender in mid-2018 and she was still considered a strong candidate when appointed
Ah...spring 2018. So young and naive.

I recall it being a pretty common idea back when Ducey appointed her, immediately after being rejected by the voters, that she was DOA for the election this year.

I don't think even the proponents of that notion had any idea how true it was at the time, though.
Logged
Lognog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,398
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #932 on: October 09, 2020, 10:25:09 AM »

There's a funny piece of revionism about the appointment being done for Ducey to win in 2022 but that ignores the fact that if he wanted a placeholder he could have appointed someone from his staff or some hack from the local party. He then easily could have either ran in the 2020 special election or in 2024 against Sinema.

Besides it wasn't assumed that McSally would lose this race; Kelly wasn't known to be running when she was appointed & although she ran a poor campaign it wasn't this awful. If he really wanted someone to lose the seat he could have appointed someone much worse like Ward

McSally was appointed because she was seen as the strongest choice & because they hoped she could use her Senate seat to save this race in 2020.

This. In fact they already had a place holder, Kyle
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,282
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #933 on: October 09, 2020, 11:52:37 AM »

Pepperidge Farm wants to send out its semi-monthly reminder that McSally was considered "moderate" and a "rising star" not too long ago.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,842
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #934 on: October 10, 2020, 09:07:58 AM »

Serious question:  why did Ducey appoint this idiot?

Assuming Ducey wanted a woman, Eileen Klein or Karrin Robson look like much better choices in retrospect. 
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #935 on: October 10, 2020, 09:20:24 AM »

With the filing deadline now having passed, 17 candidates have secured write-in status in this election: 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans, 1 Libertarian, 1 "independent Republican", 1 Unity and 7 independent candidates.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,040
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #936 on: October 14, 2020, 11:03:58 PM »

Have we gotten Q3 fundraising numbers from either of them?
Logged
tenyasha
Rookie
**
Posts: 57
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #937 on: October 14, 2020, 11:11:56 PM »

There's a funny piece of revionism about the appointment being done for Ducey to win in 2022 but that ignores the fact that if he wanted a placeholder he could have appointed someone from his staff or some hack from the local party. He then easily could have either ran in the 2020 special election or in 2024 against Sinema.

Besides it wasn't assumed that McSally would lose this race; Kelly wasn't known to be running when she was appointed & although she ran a poor campaign it wasn't this awful. If he really wanted someone to lose the seat he could have appointed someone much worse like Ward

McSally was appointed because she was seen as the strongest choice & because they hoped she could use her Senate seat to save this race in 2020.
Pretty sure Ducey wants to be president though its probably even less likely now
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,264


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #938 on: October 15, 2020, 09:10:14 AM »

Welp, McSally is definitely gonna ask her supporters to fast again after this

Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #939 on: October 15, 2020, 10:30:06 AM »

Pepperidge Farm wants to send out its semi-monthly reminder that McSally was considered "moderate" and a "rising star" not too long ago.

McSally is perhaps the perfect example of how Trump has set the GOP back for potentially the foreseeable future: a candidate like McSally, who once had demonstrable appeal to the voters the GOP needs to win, is about to be defeated (potentially by a large margin) by those exact voters because she rebranded herself as a Trump acolyte for pure political survival.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #940 on: October 15, 2020, 11:31:21 AM »

Pepperidge Farm wants to send out its semi-monthly reminder that McSally was considered "moderate" and a "rising star" not too long ago.

McSally is perhaps the perfect example of how Trump has set the GOP back for potentially the foreseeable future: a candidate like McSally, who once had demonstrable appeal to the voters the GOP needs to win, is about to be defeated (potentially by a large margin) by those exact voters because she rebranded herself as a Trump acolyte for pure political survival.

TBF though, while it has accelerated some trends in favor of the Democrats faster than normal, it has also been able to appeal to people in rural areas in particular, which is really useful in the senate. Trumpism is what blocked Heidi Heitkamp from winning ND in 2018, for instance; I bet if Kasich or someone like that won she would still have had a very good chance of holding on.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,760


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #941 on: October 15, 2020, 12:37:27 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2020, 10:15:52 PM by Pollster »

Pepperidge Farm wants to send out its semi-monthly reminder that McSally was considered "moderate" and a "rising star" not too long ago.

McSally is perhaps the perfect example of how Trump has set the GOP back for potentially the foreseeable future: a candidate like McSally, who once had demonstrable appeal to the voters the GOP needs to win, is about to be defeated (potentially by a large margin) by those exact voters because she rebranded herself as a Trump acolyte for pure political survival.

TBF though, while it has accelerated some trends in favor of the Democrats faster than normal, it has also been able to appeal to people in rural areas in particular, which is really useful in the senate. Trumpism is what blocked Heidi Heitkamp from winning ND in 2018, for instance; I bet if Kasich or someone like that won she would still have had a very good chance of holding on.

I don't think Heitkamp's loss necessarily proves that Trump has strengthened the GOP in rural states - Heitkamp still managed to get 44% in high turnout election in a state where Clinton barely broke 25% and the Democrats barely have an established apparatus, overperforming HRC by more in defeat than she did Obama in victory. Certainly some of this was due to personal appeal, but it was largely due to the same trends that flipped AZ, got Tester over 50% in MT, made TX a 3-point race, and almost got a Dem elected Governor of SD. Trumpism is essentially a short-term electoral strategy of maxing out in shrinking areas while hemorrhaging support in growing areas - it only works so long as the shrinking areas sizably outnumber the growing areas, and it isn't sustainable.
Logged
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,753
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #942 on: October 18, 2020, 10:01:57 AM »

lol

McSally campaign ad confuses Mark Kelly with twin brother
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,040
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #943 on: October 18, 2020, 10:06:23 AM »

How the hell did she win twice in a swingy House district if her political instincts are this terrible?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #944 on: October 18, 2020, 10:09:25 AM »

How the hell did she win twice in a swingy House district if her political instincts are this terrible?

McCain was there to hold the fort for most Rs in the state, just like Teddy Kennedy held the fort down on the Judiciary, but since they aren't here,no one lives forever with terminal illnesses, then D's and Rs alike have to come to terms without them
Logged
Lognog
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,398
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #945 on: October 18, 2020, 11:17:27 AM »


wow sometimes it's like I'm fasting for nothing
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,847
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #946 on: October 18, 2020, 11:45:40 AM »


This ad also makes no sense considering that Mark Kelly is *checks notes* a fighter pilot
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #947 on: October 18, 2020, 11:50:31 AM »

How the hell did she win twice in a swingy House district if her political instincts are this terrible?

She did lose in 2012 despite Mitt Romney winning the district by two points. I don't think she's ever demonstrated significant appeal, within her party or to the broader electorate.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,040
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #948 on: October 18, 2020, 12:18:18 PM »

How the hell did she win twice in a swingy House district if her political instincts are this terrible?

She did lose in 2012 despite Mitt Romney winning the district by two points. I don't think she's ever demonstrated significant appeal, within her party or to the broader electorate.

She also won by 14 in 2016, albeit over a weak opponent, while Hillary carried her district by 5. I think she has genuinely gotten weaker.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,073
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #949 on: October 18, 2020, 01:49:51 PM »

How the hell did she win twice in a swingy House district if her political instincts are this terrible?

She did lose in 2012 despite Mitt Romney winning the district by two points. I don't think she's ever demonstrated significant appeal, within her party or to the broader electorate.

She also won by 14 in 2016, albeit over a weak opponent, while Hillary carried her district by 5. I think she has genuinely gotten weaker.

I think having to shape her existing politics to fit a more Trumpian mold has probably throw her out of her comfort zone. She just doesn't sound comfortable with the canned lines about 'Counterfeit Kelly', and she when she was fighting a primary against Ward and Arpaio, her attempts to run to the right came off as self-conscious.

I'm not saying she's a moderate, I'm just wondering whether she was more suited in the party of Romney, who she signed up to run for back in '12 and '14.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 11 queries.