Lincoln v Republic of Atlasia
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:55:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Lincoln v Republic of Atlasia
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lincoln v Republic of Atlasia  (Read 939 times)
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 25, 2018, 08:14:35 PM »

Greeting Honorable Justices

Toady I am filling suit against the Republic of Atlasia on the behalf of Lincoln alleging that Executive Order #005 is illegal as it violates the Reintroduction of Top Secret Classification Act. As stated in the Reintroduction of Top Secret Classification Act only the GM may have the power to determine which individuals not listed in the bill may receive classified information and the President may not have the power to unilaterally declassify information.  


 Executive Order #005:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.


    This bill has passed Congress and is presented to the President for her signature:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Atlasian House of Representatives
Passed 8-0 in the Atlasian House Assembled,


As amended by Senate:

People's Regional Senate
Passed 5-1 in the Atlasian Senate assembled


Atlasian House of Representatives
Passed 6-0-3 in the Atlasian House Assembled,


President of Congress
Be it resolved, X Vice President PiT
[/quote]
[/quote]

Thanks
Lincoln AG
1184AZ
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2018, 01:23:13 PM »

This has been seen
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2018, 01:23:44 PM »

The Supreme Court of Atlasia grants certiorari to hear the question of whether this executive order #005 was illegal or not.

Schedule

Petitioner has seventy-two hours to file his brief.  It is expected no later than 2:00PM EDT on  Sunday, December 2, 2018.

Respondent has an additional seventy-two hours to file his brief.  It is expected no later than 2:00PM EDT on Wednesday, December 5, 2018.

Amicus Briefs will be accepted until 2:00PM EDT on Thursday, December 6, 2018.

Additional time may be granted to either party, and the right of either party to respond to the filed briefs may be granted upon request.

A period of argument (Q&A) will be scheduled after presentation of the briefs in case any member of the Court has any questions for the parties.
Logged
Poirot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,523
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2018, 10:18:37 PM »

Can the petitioner be changed to another name. I don't see any regional aspect to the case so why use Lincoln name when you can use any citizen.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2018, 08:24:00 PM »
« Edited: December 01, 2018, 08:29:54 PM by Baconomics 🐖 »

Can the petitioner be changed to another name. I don't see any regional aspect to the case so why use Lincoln name when you can use any citizen.

historically stuff like "standing" and the technicalities of who is suing on behalf of who has been brushed but I agree that the petitioner probably shouldn't be listed as a regional government unless they are a member of the regional government acting in their official capacity (or a third party delegated by such official). If anything it sounds like it's most accurate for the Game Moderator to be listed as the official plaintiff although the GM's direct involvement in the legal system in such a manner, even if in name only, would be quite unorthodox (and unless I'm forgetting something, it hasn't happened since literally 2006!)

Typically in this kind of situation the person filing the suit is considered the petitioner and official listed party in the lawsuit (and historically, multiple cases known for example as 1184AZ v Atlasia would be just listed using Roman numerals (e.g. the fourth time I sued the government of the "Dirty South" under DWTL, it was called "Bacon King v Southeast IV".

This is not exactly consistent with IRL legal terminology but potential alternative nomenclature could perhaps be "In re Executive Order #005 or something to that effect.
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2018, 01:34:33 PM »

Greeting Honorable Justices

On Nov. 22 President Weatherboy issued the following executive order to expand authorization of classified information.

 Executive Order #005:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

However as stated in the Reintroduction of Top Secret Classification Act only the GM may have the power to determine which individuals not listed in the bill may receive classified information and the President may not have the power to unilaterally declassify information. 


     This bill has passed Congress and is presented to the President for her signature:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Atlasian House of Representatives
Passed 8-0 in the Atlasian House Assembled,


As amended by Senate:

People's Regional Senate
Passed 5-1 in the Atlasian Senate assembled


Atlasian House of Representatives
Passed 6-0-3 in the Atlasian House Assembled,


President of Congress
Be it resolved, X Vice President PiT
[/quote]
[/quote]

Further the constitution does not grant the President power to choose who can receive classified information. Instead the constitution remains silent on that matter which we can confer suggests that the Reintroduction of Top Secret Classification Act should serve as the main regulatory standard for classified information in Atlasia.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Thank you
Lincoln AG
1184AZ
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2018, 03:18:53 PM »

Sorry for being slow. I have been victim of a scam. My Activity will get back to normal this week end.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2018, 06:30:07 PM »

I have been informed by Attorney General Bacon King that he will be unavailable in the next 48 hours due to an IRL issue.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2018, 05:47:52 PM »

I have been informed by Attorney General Bacon King that he will be unavailable in the next 48 hours due to an IRL issue.

issue has been solved! Smiley expect brief soon
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2018, 10:54:57 AM »

Thank you for your brief 118AAZ.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2018, 06:01:18 PM »

Your honor,

I move for a summary dismissal of this case due to a lack of justiciable controversy. While the issue raised by the petitioner was valid, it is now moot.

1. Between the issuance of Executive Order #005 and the present there has been no dissemination of classified material to any individual not authorized by the Reintroduction of Top Secret Classification Act (ROTSCA)

2. The President has since issued Executive Order #007, amending EO #005 by harmonizing it with the security clearance rules of ROTSCA:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Thank you.

Attorney General Bacon King
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,514
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 15, 2018, 08:33:10 AM »

Indeed, as this executive order has been revoked and changed, there is no standing anymore.

The case is dismissed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.152 seconds with 12 queries.