2020 dem IA caucus winner's vote share?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 08:39:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  2020 dem IA caucus winner's vote share?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What percentage of the Iowa caucus vote will its winner receive? For comparison, Cruz got 27.6% in 2016. (CNN)
#1
>50%
 
#2
40-50%
 
#3
30-40%
 
#4
25-30%
 
#5
20-25%
 
#6
17-20%
 
#7
14-17%
 
#8
10-14%
 
#9
7-10%
 
#10
<7%
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: 2020 dem IA caucus winner's vote share?  (Read 387 times)
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 25, 2018, 04:21:09 PM »

Put your comments down below!
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2018, 04:25:50 PM »

There seem likely to be a lot of candidates, so I would say Beto will probably end up limited to 25-30%. He will get strong support especially in the college towns, where he will run up the score with young caucusgoers. It is possible he could end up a bit higher if there are too many candidates still in, however, simply because a lot of those candidates will end up not meeting the viability requirement in many caucuses.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2018, 07:43:19 PM »

It is possible he could end up a bit higher if there are too many candidates still in, however, simply because a lot of those candidates will end up not meeting the viability requirement in many caucuses.

It's interesting that you say that, because the Iowa Dems have agreed in principle to reforming the caucus process in a way that will likely lead to them releasing the initial tally of voter support, before support is reallocated based on viability (though the details have yet to be worked out, so this isn't a certainty).  Assuming this happens, then it's unclear how the media will report the caucus results.  Will they have both "popular vote" and "state delegate equivalent" numbers side by side?  My guess would be yes, and that the media would treat the former as the "real" number, even though from a delegate perspective it doesn't matter.
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2018, 07:50:24 PM »

It is possible he could end up a bit higher if there are too many candidates still in, however, simply because a lot of those candidates will end up not meeting the viability requirement in many caucuses. informed, and up-to-date

It's interesting that you say that, because the Iowa Dems have agreed in principle to reforming the caucus process in a way that will likely lead to them releasing the initial tally of voter support, before support is reallocated based on viability (though the details have yet to be worked out, so this isn't a certainty).  Assuming this happens, then it's unclear how the media will report the caucus results.  Will they have both "popular vote" and "state delegate equivalent" numbers side by side?  My guess would be yes, and that the media would treat the former as the "real" number, even though from a delegate perspective it doesn't matter.


Very interesting. If you hear whatever, please keep me in the loop.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.